Google Checkout Sees Poor Customer Satisfaction 191
Aryabhata writes "Ars Technica reports on a survey by investment firm J.P. Morgan Securities, stating that Google Checkout has had a relatively quick and modest market penetration of six percent since its launch in June of 2006, but lags behind in customer satisfaction vs PayPal. On the customer satisfaction front, only 18.8 percent reported having a 'good' or 'very good' experience with Google Checkout, while 81.2 percent indicated a fair to poor experience customer experience compared to PayPal's 44.2 percent reporting good experiences. Some users have reported anecdotally that Google Checkout mistakenly canceled sales without warning or that the checkout process took too long."
Re:Google's touch (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Horrible Experience with Google Checkout (Score:5, Informative)
1. Did you notice that Ritz Camera has a 1.37 reseller rating? http://www.resellerratings.com/store/Ritz_Camera_
2. On the above link there is at least one story similar to your own where Ritz had to admit it was their fault (that customer apparently did not take their BS) and even offer a $25 gift card!
3. It should have been obvious to you that for a system, especially from a company with such an excellent track record in online applications, it would have been a little hard to send an event to the end user without receiving an event from Ritz Camera. Similarly, when Ritz send the cancellation event, Google Checkout send the cancellation message as it should.
But thats just like microsoft... (Score:3, Informative)
I know another software company that happened to drown in money and used it to just buy everybody and everything they might find usefull...
Re:C'est la vie. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:My order was abruptly cancelled (Score:3, Informative)
No Bank Acount ties. (Score:3, Informative)
1) no ties to your bankaccount so they can't freeze your assets
2) a trustworthy company that actually has contact information.
Re:The world is bigger than the US (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Huh? (Score:1, Informative)
They are not your bank who you can call, give them your account number and password and have things sorted out with your account. That is why it took you so long to find out what is going on.
Re:Google's touch (Score:2, Informative)
According to Hitwise [hitwise.com], Google Blog Search traffic over took Technorati's traffic in December.
Re:Won't touch PayPal, not even for simple payment (Score:3, Informative)
Remember the Iran Contra hearings. Don't you know that just "deleting" something doesn't necessarily make it go away? Particularly in the case of a Google, which replicates data continuously to multiple datacenters.
Re:Won't touch PayPal, not even for simple payment (Score:2, Informative)
Here [headru.sh] is the first page customers get when using Paypal as a payment gateway.
Is it so hard to find the non paypal account option ?
Also, notice the writing at the bottom of the page - Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom as an electronic money institution.
Just for completeness, here is the second page [headru.sh] you get to if you choose non paypal. Oh, seems like that's pretty straightforward too. Maybe you're just a troll.
Re:Huh? (Score:2, Informative)
There is a more complicated system that allows more features and allows you to integrate this into your normal invoicing system. It requires some significant programming, and it requires you to be able to inject information into your invoicing system. It looks like some companies find it easier to setup a second invoicing system then trying to inject the information int their main system. This is not acceptable and WILL cause problems. This is the sort of thing that causes orders to be cancled for no valid reason without alerting the buyer.
Basically the API is very complex and if a merchant messes it up there will be problems, and the user experience will be less than satisfactory.
Re:PayPal: Adversarial and tricky. (Score:3, Informative)
Chicken, meet Egg.
Spam! (Score:3, Informative)
Despite my clear indication of the "don't spam me" preference, I started getting regular, frequent, promotional mailings.
The "stop getting mail from this merchant" thing didn't work.
Google's support desk didn't respond to queries.
The merchant couldn't do anything about it, since they have no control; they can forward mail to Google for "our customers", but that's it.
Google's only "unsubscribe" option is "prevent any messages, whether they're order-related or not, sent by this merchant, from reaching me."
Pretty much never gonna use that again, believe me. They don't allow you to opt out of purely promotional bulk mailings without completely severing all contact. If you later use their system to buy from a merchant, then you are immediately back on ALL the promotional stuff for that merchant, because you were never actually removed from the list; they were just blocking mail to you from that merchant. You can't have a way to communicate, without being spammed.
Will they fix it? I don't know. After multiple spams and heroic efforts to get anyone in the checkout group to do anything, I did eventually stop receiving mail, but so far as I know, they have no plans to fix the underlying system.
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Informative)
non US cards (Score:3, Informative)
I think I have once had this happen to me. Since all I was buying was an ebook, I simply entered a random US address that I pulled from a website. This worked fine.
So in reality, they accepted non-US cards just fine. They did not accept non-US addresses - even for a download able item.
I have observed a few things about my european VISA card on american sites: All they are able to verify is the card number, expiry date and the 3 digit security number. I am able to enter completely random information for all other fields, including the name field (the one they always ask to be spelled exactly like on the card).
In fact, I often have to enter wrong information, as my address include non english characters, and many american websites are apparently still made by people that live in a 7 bit ASCII world.