NY Times Tries to Untangle Analysts and Shills

twitter writes "The Register and others are examining a New York Times effort to eliminate bias from technology reporting by not echoing paid opinions. (Other coverage here.) They target Microsoft specifically. InfoWorld has an insightful summary of the two sides of this old debate. Fake think tanks, dubious sponsored research, and Astroturf are not considered but should be. Companies using these tactics deserve to be held at arm's length, but that's hard to do when the company is also a monopoly able to make or break any 'expert.' It would be refreshing to see the New York Times discover the FSF, opensource.org, EFF, and other sources of computing expertise."

Re:EFF and FSF unbiased?

[rrohbeck]

Their's is a *good* bias.

Repeat after me:

Microsoft==Evil
Oracle==Evil
EFF==Good
FSF==Good

I'm glad we got this taken care of.

Re:Extend beyond just 'tech'

[Fear the Clam]

called the MX which is provided at train stations

I suppose its editorial page is called the Peacemaker?

Sorry, '80s joke there, kids.