Experts Rate Wikipedia Higher Than Non-Experts 204
Grooves writes "A new Wikipedia study suggests that when experts and non-experts look to assess Wikipedia for accuracy, the non-experts are harder on the free encyclopedia than the experts. The researcher had 55 graduate students and research assistants examine one Wikipedia article apiece for accuracy, some in fields they were familiar with and some not. Those in the expert group ranked their articles as generally credible, higher than those evaluated by the non-experts. One researcher said 'It may be the case that non-experts are more cynical about information outside of their field and the difference comes from a natural reaction to rate unfamiliar articles as being less credible.'" That's the problem people face when 'everyone who disagrees with you is a moron'.
Good to Know (Score:4, Funny)
Re:A Possible Reason (Score:5, Funny)
I hope they didn't act on it. (Score:4, Funny)
I just hope that those non-experts didn't feel the urge to "fix" anything.
Re:Good to Know (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Simple (Score:2, Funny)
I didn't realize the study was editable prior to it being released.
Re:Weirdly, it does (Score:3, Funny)
off-by-one error invokes thread exception (Score:3, Funny)
Being the first comment, an off-by-one exception occurs, resulting in an aborted termination of the thread.
Re:A Possible Reason (Score:3, Funny)
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard, you moron
Re:A Possible Reason (Score:2, Funny)
Re:A Possible Reason (Score:5, Funny)
Re:off-by-one error invokes thread exception (Score:4, Funny)