RFID Tech Infiltrating a British Institution 123
An anonymous reader writes, "According to silicon.com, Marks & Spencer — a department store as quintessentially British as tea & cake — is so pleased with its trial of RFID clothes-tagging that it's planning to roll it out nationwide. Considering that the UK's Information Commissioner recently made a lot of noise around the RFID track and trace tech, warning that Britain is 'sleepwalking into a surveillance society', Marks & Sparks seems to be setting itself up as a tweed-clad Public Enemy Number One."
It's removeable (Score:5, Informative)
Buy garment, remove RFID tag. Hopefully, it will be on one of the easily removed tags that you cut off anyway.
Re:Spencer != Sparks (Score:5, Informative)
Re:what? (Score:3, Informative)
They're just using RFID to prevent shoplifting.
If you had bothered to RTFA instead of jerking your knee, you'd have read that they're using it for inventory control.
some information, to counteract the FUD (Score:1, Informative)
Furthermore, the only thing most current tags can "tell you" even if you are near a reader is "hey, my number is (insert string of numbers here)". At best, it would decode into "Shipment #229 out of distribution center #101 shipped on (date)." Nothing at all personal about the buyer. RFID tech is a long long way from making you want a tinfoil overcoat. I've worked in the industry; I know.
Re:what? (Score:3, Informative)
The RFID tags are contained in throwaway paper labels attached to, but not embedded in, a variety of men's and women's clothing items in stores.
Someone could simply rip off the label before exiting the store if they wanted to shoplift.
Anyway, I think people's objection is that eventually the RFID tags will become commonplace. But instead of placing them in easy-to-remove paper lables, they will be embeddeded in the fabric, or other materials/products, to be used as you describe.
I'm not saying that will happen, although I think someone will try, or that there's any legitimate risk of people being tracked using these things, but that's "how this is bad" in a nutshell.
Re:Not so bad (Score:4, Informative)