Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

iPod Seat-Back Video Coming To Flights 255

cameronk writes, "Apple announced partnership agreements with Air France, Continental, Delta, Emirates, KLM, and United that will let you display video from your iPod on the screen of the seat in front of you. Plus, the connectors charge iPods throughout the flight. This will be great for inter-continental flights where even my iPod Nano runs out of juice. I wonder how the airlines are going to keep inappropriate video (i.e. porn or even just movies like "Snakes on a Plane" or "Alive") from appearing on the seat-back displays."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

iPod Seat-Back Video Coming To Flights

Comments Filter:
  • Boeing... (Score:5, Funny)

    by CokeBear ( 16811 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:10PM (#16840630) Journal
    Boeing: The world's largest iPod accessory manufacturer.

    747: The world's largest iPod accessory.
  • by jigjigga ( 903943 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:18PM (#16840776)
    Oh noes! Now we will have MPAA Air martials watching for dvd-screeners and cams.
  • by gsslay ( 807818 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:20PM (#16840806)
    I'm more interested in Zune compatability. Can I use Zune's great wifi capabilities to exchange MP3s with the onboard flight navigation system? They're DRMed to 3 days, but when your life expectancy is 1 hour max, who cares?!

    And when we crash, we'll go down grooving.

  • by Secrity ( 742221 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:26PM (#16840940)
    "Personally, I prefer to not divert power from the plane's engines.

    MY GOD, I had NO idea that iPods use enough power to tax a jetliner's engines. Do they require 3 phase power, or will they work from US standard 120/240 volt split phase power? How much do they cost to run for one month, assuming 6 hours of use a day and 10 cents per KWh?
  • by jsebrech ( 525647 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:27PM (#16840966)
    I wonder how the airlines are going to keep inappropriate video (i.e. porn or even just movies like "Snakes on a Plane" or "Alive") from appearing on the seat-back displays.

    The same way they keep you from running up and down the plane mid-flight shouting "we're all gonna die!".

    Besides, it's not even necessarily the passengers who rile up things. A few years ago I was on a plane waiting for take-off where the stewardess figured that the best solution to calm pre-take-off nerves would be to put on the radio through the cabin speakers. Much to her surprise, the song playing at that very moment was "killing me softly", and you can all have a guess which words came out of the speakers first...
  • by El Torico ( 732160 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:35PM (#16841122)
    Video iPod - $250
    Label Maker - $27
    Scaring the crap out of unsuspecting passengers with the new "pilot's view display" and footage from the nose of a cruise missle - Priceless.
  • by dimer0 ( 461593 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:47PM (#16841328)
    ... Microsoft to buy Quantas Airlines - Quantas will be first to have z00n wireless
  • by Bazman ( 4849 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:52PM (#16841438) Journal
    A wit once said there were two classes of travel, 'First Class', and 'With Children'.

  • by soft_guy ( 534437 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @02:58PM (#16841536)
    Yeah, what's the etiquette for looking at porn on your laptop while flying?

    You are supposed to ask the woman next to you if she wants to joint the mile high club. Do that while pointing at your laptop screen. It is sure to impress her.
  • by Sax Maniac ( 88550 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @03:04PM (#16841658) Homepage Journal
    Personally, I'm up for a no fat people airline. And no smelly people. And no people with brown skin. And no Mormons! Or old people, they're too slow.
  • by EvilNTUser ( 573674 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @03:06PM (#16841704)

    "Why do companies keep on locking themselves into one device when it would be much easier to support a large number of devices."

    Yeah, that was my first reaction too; this is a horrible development. The future could offer wonderful potential for ubiquitous connectivity, but policies like these will only ensure that actually interfacing with devices in practice will be harder than ever. We'd be better off with RS-232, frankly.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @03:13PM (#16841840)
    On the flipside, that cute lady would probably pay $100 to NOT sit next to you.
  • by Wellington Grey ( 942717 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @03:22PM (#16842004) Homepage Journal
    Offtopic, but - who's up for a "no kids" airline? I'd definitely pay an extra $10 per flight to ensure there aren't any crying babies onboard.


    I've always assumed that virgin airlines would be the natural ones to take up that cause.

    -Grey [wellingtongrey.net]
  • by entropy42 ( 109731 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @03:25PM (#16842080) Homepage
    I wonder how the airlines are going to keep inappropriate video (i.e. porn or even just movies like "Snakes on a Plane [CC]" or "Alive [CC]") from appearing on the seat-back displays.

    Yeah, we've only had portable DVD players for about eight years, so the issue has never come up before. I assume they'll put several viewing enforcement marshalls on every flight - that's the most straightforward answer, anyway.
  • Re:ie vs eg (Score:3, Funny)

    by jdcook ( 96434 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @03:43PM (#16842368)
    Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Let me explain something to you. Momo is dead. Which means everything he had now belongs to Jimmy Cap, including you. Which also means, when I speak, I speak for Jimmy. E.g., from now on, you start showing me the proper fuckin' respect."

    Chili Palmer: ""E.g." means "for example". What I think you want to use is "i.e."."

    Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Bullshit! That's short for "ergo"."

    Chili Palmer: "Ask your man."

    Bodyguard: "To the best of my knowledge, "e.g." means "for example"."

    Ray "Bones" Barboni: "E.g., i.e., fuck you! The point is this: When I say "jump", you say "OK", okay?"
  • by Odin's Raven ( 145278 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @03:47PM (#16842462)
    You are supposed to ask the woman next to you if she wants to joint the mile high club. Do that while pointing at your laptop screen. It is sure to impress her.

    I suspect this depends on how impressive your pointer is...

  • by norminator ( 784674 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @04:16PM (#16842940)
    It's not the inappropriate videos we should worry about... it's the new undercover MPAA air marshals who will be watching out for anyone allowing other passengers to see any movie that they haven't paid to see. There will be a new MPAA box for you to deposit $5 into on your way off the plane if you watched the movie on the screen of the person next to you... The marshals are watching, you'd better pay up!
  • by Aceticon ( 140883 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @04:32PM (#16843226)

    Yeah, you can also pull out a Hustler magazine and read it

    Even beter, you can: loudly comment on the boobs of the models; tell everybody around you how last month's centerfold was much beter and proceed to explain why; comment on how you can just see that "that one ain't a real blonde"; digress into a loud monologue about the difficulties of masturbating on an airplane bathroom while holding a Hustler.

    The possibilities are limitless!!!
  • by cmdr_beeftaco ( 562067 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @05:10PM (#16843998)
    With the recent airline cutbacks, the lack of pillows has me appreicating fat people more and more. If only they didn't sweat so much.
  • by stunt_penguin ( 906223 ) on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @06:42PM (#16845396)
    How to keep inappropriate content off seatback displays?

    One word : Tasers.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 14, 2006 @07:52PM (#16846242)
    Well, sir, I hate to get involved like this, but "gratuitous example" is an idiotic way to translate exempli gratia. Let's consider what gratuitous really means: "1 a : given unearned or without recompense b : not involving a return benefit, compensation, or consideration c : costing nothing : FREE 2 : not called for by the circumstances : UNWARRANTED" (from m-w.com)

    "Gratuitous example" is, then, not the same as saying "for the sake of an example." Is the example given free of charge? Is it unwarranted? Maybe, but that's different from saying that you're giving something "for the sake of an example." It doesn't even mean what you think it means! "Gratuitous example" doesn't even mean "and [sic??!] example given to make something more clear"!

    You can't "translate" exempli gratia just by throwing similar sounding English words together!

    To explain the phrase: gratia normally means such varied things as grace, charm, favor, service, and can be difficult to translate. In this particular case, it is being used in an idiomatic phrase - gratia as an ablative coupled with a genitive means "for the sake of."

    But hey! You didn't know that! But hey! Gratia and gratuitous look similar! They must mean the same thing! wtf!

    Here's an idea: How about we just talk about stuff we know about.

    (I know, I know; this is slashdot; I must be new here, how about a Beowulf cluster of those, etc., etc.)
  • by greppling ( 601175 ) on Wednesday November 15, 2006 @03:51AM (#16849370)
    Interestingly, he actually seemed to be reading the articles. Because he spent quite a lot of time even on pages without any pictures of naked bits.
    Sounds like you were waiting impatiently for him to turn the page...
  • by Moofie ( 22272 ) <lee AT ringofsaturn DOT com> on Friday November 17, 2006 @01:17PM (#16886292) Homepage
    "USB carries data not video."

    I want you to think about this really, really hard, and try again.

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...