History To Repeat Itself With PS3? 390
Dr. Eggman writes to mention a 1up article looking at the way things were when the PS2 launched vs. next week's PlayStation 3 launch. The question: can history repeat itself? From the article: "PS2: Released one year after the lower priced Dreamcast, lauded for its great games, ease of development, and superior online service. PS3: Releasing one year after the lower priced Xbox 360, lauded for its great games, ease of development, and superior online service. PS2: Competition from Nintendo: A smaller, cheaper 'family friendly' console with a 'focus on gameplay.' PS3: Competition from Nintendo: A smaller, cheaper 'family friendly' console with a 'focus on gameplay.'" The article also looks at how things have changed for Sony since the last time around.
Re:The Other side of the coin (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:The Other side of the coin (Score:5, Interesting)
PS3: You're not getting one. Ha!
Wii: Risky, but inexpensive.
XBox: Just fork over the cash for instant gratification.
I think that says a lot about the mainstream views on this generation of console.
The article can be read online here:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/gaming/2006-11-09-co
Sega Issues (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:summary: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:summary: (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Sony doesn't much care how they compare to Xbox (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Sony doesn't much care how they compare to Xbox (Score:4, Interesting)
Easily. HD-DVD has the letters "DVD" in it. That has an immediate meaning in the average consumer's head: It's like DVD, but now it's in HD! Just like how a HD-TV is like a TV but in HD!
HD-DVD, regardless of how well it actually performs, has an immediate name recognition. The name "Blu-ray" really doesn't convey any meaning to the average Joe Blow -- unless s/he already did the homework. It doesn't exactly scream, "This is better than DVD!"
Re:Sony doesn't much care how they compare to Xbox (Score:2, Interesting)
So I really don't forsee this as being a coup for Sony. It might be, but I don't think so. I bought an N65 and then a Playstation. I bought a Playstation2 and then a Gamecube. I would have bought an original Xbox if any of my friends had them.
At $600, I will never buy a PS3, regardless of the fact that I've already pre-ordered a Wii. Ken was right - at that price, it's not a gaming machine anymore. If I buy a second console, it will be an Xbox 360, even though I loathe Microsoft.
With the high price of the PS3, the initial install base will grow very slowly. This will cause a low volume of game sales, which will further cause fewer games to come out, which will cause fewer people to buy a PS3. It will just snowball from there. Sony simply does not have the first party games to pull this off. I think Nintendo MIGHT be able to do it, but it would take a radical marketing and focus shift. But their first party titles would guarantee an initial install base to get the ball rolling. Microsoft might be able to get it going due to Halo and its penchant for just buying up game developers. Sony would have a small chance of doing it based on games that tend to be exclusive to it (at least initially), but with the pricing they have just guaranteed it will not happen.
It really just comes down to a VERY simple fact - $600. Even at $500, it's a bad deal. $500 is right around the price for a lot of people where purchases move from "do I want this?" to "do I need this?". And when you add on the price of a game and an extra controller, bumping it up around $100, most people will decide they don't need it. I think this would be true even if the Xbox and Wii were launching two years later than the PS3.
And Blu-Ray will do absolutely nothing to help sell more than a few million or so PS3s. Studies have shown that the average household income for HDTV owners is nearly $90k. [usatoday.com] The people with that kind of money would probably have bought the PS3 anyway. But the people at the lower end of the scale who really stretched their finances to buy the HDTV to begin with will be hard put to shell out for the PS3. And if you look at that study, only about half the people watch HD programming on their HDTVs. These people aren't exactly clamoring for higher quality video.
So while I could completely be wrong, I predict this could be a complete catastrophe for Sony. This opinion doesn't come from fanboism. Nintendo cured me of that with the N64 debacle. Since then I have been fairly platform neutral. Even my disgust with Microsoft wouldn't have kept me from buying an Xbox if I could have convinced my brother to get broadband so we could play online.
My prediction for hitting the different milestones are:
5 million sales in the first 9 months
30 million sales three years from launch
50 million sales five years from launch
Re:The Other side of the coin (Score:3, Interesting)
I really couldn't believe Nintendo would setup their kiosks like this. If I found the Wii to look bad compared to a game cube I can't imagine how bad it's going to look if next to an xbox 360 or a PS3. I'm not sure the $250 price tag can remove that bad taste from someone's mouth.
Also, I played Excite Truck and it really wasn't anything worthwhile. I assume they didn't have Wii sports in it because the Gamestop I was at was a very small store and they probably couldn't make it work in there. I'm really hoping it's not that they're trying to hide any problems with the Wiimote.
Re:That's not the real reason (Score:4, Interesting)
i agree that the PS3 does not have the same bonus appeal. DVDs were so much better than VHS, the jump to the new formats does not seem to have the same upgrade feel. if you dropped the money on a HD flat panel TV etc etc and care that much to upgrade all your movies.... the cost issue is probably insignificant.
i agree that this is going to be the opposite effect..... people will now just happen to have a Blu-Ray compatible player so they may start buying some movies on that format (if there is some special edition or something). i have a feeling the quality issues won't be enough at this point, for this audience at least.
Re:History's not repeating (Score:4, Interesting)
In Europe, Wii is getting released Before Christmas, PS3 is getting released After Christmas, which I'd guess will be hugely important. That said, from what I hear from my contacts in the school playground (which is to say my little sister) the DS Lite is the must-have Christmas gift this year...
Re:summary: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:That's not the real reason (Score:3, Interesting)
Obviously you don't know parents with kids.
Also, you don't know me or any of my PS2-owning friends, all of whom used their PS2 as a DVD player. DVD players were expensive at the time and most of us didn't have one, but were willing to shell out money for a PS2. As it is, I didn't get mine at launch time, I waited for a price drop. Ended up getting the GT3 bundle.
The PS2 may have been a crap DVD player (although the PSTwo is MUCH better - you can even turn it on and off with the remote like a real DVD player) but if you were buying one anyway, the functionality was basically free - unlike the PS3, which costs $200 more than the competition because it adds this higher-capacity drive.
Re:The Other side of the coin (Score:2, Interesting)
In contrast, there was a huge positive hype over Xbox 360 on all the Japanese game forums prior to release date, leaving naive viewers with no doubt who the next generation winner is going to be. Today, the 360 is dead in Japan--it has a puny <160K install base, and it will never occupy more than a Amiga-like niche. But game forums to this day are still dominated by kids gushing over Blue Odyssey or whatever the latest Great White Hope is for the 360 these days, and they will tell you the PS3 is a POS hardware that will never sell.
Conclusion: game forums are not accurate indicators of real consumer demand.
Re:The Other side of the coin (Score:3, Interesting)
Apple.
Dell.
Coca-Cola.
Proctor & Gamble.
VISA.
All of them are doing very well in a supposedly xenophobic Japanese market, even though credible domestic alternatives exist. The Japanese people are perfectly happy to take Western products over Japanese products if they are in fact superior to needs in Japan, and is marketed properly. Microsoft can't blame the society for the horrendous performance over here.
As for the "Hard-Core" gamer segment, no, Sony is NOT supposed to be aiming at them. Microsoft already tried that on both sides of the Pacific Ocean, and the result is instadeath in Japan and less-than-PS2 sales in the US. There are just too few of them, and more importantly, they do not drive game sales because non-core gamers generally do not look to them when picking games. Compare this to the fashion industry, in which core fashion experts can and do drive trend because many women take Metropolitan and Elle models and journalists' words for gospel. Gamers and game journalists, in contrast, generally get all the respect of dung beetles(look at the level of respect Zonk is getting around here, for example), and is therefore unable to influence the general public beyond their own little circle.
As for multi-platform games, we'll see. There has never been a situation in console game history in which porting was widespread--it has always been limited to a few powerful franchises that did not need console maker's support--but maybe the market dynamics has changed so much that it is now going to happen. I'm not holding my breath, though. A more likely scenario is that games within a franchise gets released for different platforms, which is already starting to happen: Ridge Racer 6 for Xbox 360, RR7 for PS3; and FF12 for PS2, FF12RW for NDS.