History To Repeat Itself With PS3? 390
Dr. Eggman writes to mention a 1up article looking at the way things were when the PS2 launched vs. next week's PlayStation 3 launch. The question: can history repeat itself? From the article: "PS2: Released one year after the lower priced Dreamcast, lauded for its great games, ease of development, and superior online service. PS3: Releasing one year after the lower priced Xbox 360, lauded for its great games, ease of development, and superior online service. PS2: Competition from Nintendo: A smaller, cheaper 'family friendly' console with a 'focus on gameplay.' PS3: Competition from Nintendo: A smaller, cheaper 'family friendly' console with a 'focus on gameplay.'" The article also looks at how things have changed for Sony since the last time around.
summary: (Score:3, Funny)
same games, better graphics, pay us again
Re:The Other side of the coin (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Wrong? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Online service? Don't forget to get the update! (Score:5, Funny)
History To Repeat Itself? (Score:5, Funny)
1. The naysayers will say that it'll suck
2. It'll sell beyond expectations
3. The naysayers deny the first statement and claim they knew all along
Simple Answers to Slashdot Questions (Score:5, Funny)
No.
This has been another episode of Simple Answers to Slashdot Questions.
Re:The Other side of the coin (Score:4, Funny)
$600 doesn't leave much room for any games
Of course, Sony not having many launch titles (Oblivion, I'm looking at you) means you don't need any games for your $600 videogame system!
Who writes these, 12 year olds? (Score:3, Funny)
The past tense of cost is cost. You sound like a retard or an elementary school child when you write it in a "real" article. This is the first line, too! Do they not hire editors at 1up?
Playing DVDs on the PS2 is very nice! (Score:5, Funny)
DISC READ ERROR