Every Vista Computer Gets Its Own Domain Name 388
c_forq writes, "According to APC magazine, every new Windows Vista computer will be given its own domain name to access files remotely. There is a catch though: to use it one must be using IPv6. Is the push for Vista also going to be the push finally to switch everything from IPv4 to IPv6?" Microsoft, meanwhile, is trying to convince businesses to adopt both Vista and Office 2007 at once. An analyst is quoted: 'In all likelihood, enterprises will tie deployment of both Vista and Office 2007 with a hardware upgrade cycle.' His reasoning is that it will be easier for companies to handle one disruption to IT systems than two. Or three.
I have been waiting this... (Score:5, Funny)
Both at the same time, eh? (Score:5, Funny)
I couldn't agree more: switch to BOTH Linux and OpenOffice.org 2.0 at the same time.
Office2007 (Score:5, Funny)
Naysayers, post here (Score:4, Funny)
domain names (Score:5, Funny)
microsoft-eats-children.share.live.com
nochildpornhere.share.live.com
microsoftupdate.com.share.live.com
update.paypal.com.share.live.com
freexxxdonkiesandmidgetsgonewild.share.live.com
Admit it... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why upgrade? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Office2007 (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Office2007 (Score:2, Funny)
Re:domain names (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I have been waiting this... (Score:1, Funny)
no problem, boy. as i said: developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers, developers.
--
stevie b.
Re:Slashdot tags (Score:3, Funny)
Re:domain names (Score:2, Funny)
Re:domain names (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Migrate to GNU/Linux, not Vista (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, I heard those Linux media players suck, too.
Re:IPv6 adoption. (Score:4, Funny)
Sounds like you couldn't think of anything...
Re:domain names (Score:5, Funny)
Yep, that belongs to the Gnome group . . .
Re:I have been waiting this... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Migrate to GNU/Linux, not Vista (Score:3, Funny)
It's an operating system. Operating systems broker between computing resources and computer software.
As such, the argument for any superior operating system is "It does what (inferior system) does, only so much better."
Regardless, is the fact that it does the same thing better and cheaper not a reasonable argument for using it? Did we get transported into some parallel dimension where those are not desirable qualities? IS THIS THE EVIL UNIVERSE? *checks* No, I still have my goatee. Wait, I have a goatee! Maybe this IS the evil universe!
No wait, I'm still right-handed. *whew*
Re:MAKE THE MADNESS STOP! (Score:2, Funny)
Slashdot is a tough place. We all do our best, but every now and again, someone mentally cracks and posts a long and desperate rant. And to support them, other Slashdotters mod them -1 Flamebait.
Re:Misleading Headline (Score:3, Funny)
Proprietary Network Resolution Protocol
Re:IPv6 adoption. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:IPv6 adoption. (Score:3, Funny)
"Here. Here's electricity and an electric range."
"I can't switch to that! Elephant shit COOKS MY FOOD!"
hey (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Migrate to GNU/Linux, not Vista (Score:3, Funny)