Long-Term Wikipedia Vandalism Exposed 313
Daveydweeb writes, "The accuracy of Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia, came into question again when a long-standing article on 'NPA personality theory' was confirmed to be a hoax. Not only had the article survived at Wikipedia for the better part of a year, but it had even been listed as a 'Good Article,' supposedly placing it in the top 0.2-0.3% of all Wikipedia articles — despite being almost entirely written by the creator of the theory himself."
Re:Really? Unconfirmed info on wikipedia?!? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Irregardless is not a fucking word (Score:3, Funny)
http://m-w.com/dictionary/fucking [m-w.com]
Re:Irregardless is not a fucking word (Score:4, Funny)
Yes it is, I saw it in wikipedia!
Irregardless is a word [wikipedia.org]
Re:I don't see the problem here (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Really? Unconfirmed info on wikipedia?!? (Score:4, Funny)
I don't believe this is true at all!
Re:Really? Unconfirmed info on wikipedia?!? (Score:3, Funny)