PC Makers May Be Left On the Shelves 186
An anonymous reader writes "With the problems posed by a new Microsoft OS, exploding laptop batteries, and changing technology, PC makers may be feeling this pinch this holiday season. Many consumers who are considering purchasing PC hardware are going to be holding off for next year, according to research analysts." From the article: "According to market researcher IDC, PC shipment growth slowed to 7.9 percent in the third quarter, from double-digit percentage growth in the prior three years. The battery recalls may cut into fourth quarter growth, IDC said. Bank of America on October 31 cut its 2006 PC growth forecast to 9.4 percent from 10 percent. All this suggests that consumers looking for bargain gifts may opt for less-expensive gadgets such as cell phones, digital music players, video phones or noise-cancelling headphones."
Absolutely... (Score:2, Funny)
They're waiting for the new Mac models to be announced at MacWorld before buying a real PC with a real OS.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Go ahead and smack me. I just installed kubuntu 6.10 and it runs like a turtle compared to XP. KDE does look nice though, and my system is hardly shovelhardware: amd 3400+, 1 gig ram, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not dogging Linux here, even if I think they are neglecting the one market they need to win if they want a foothold, and that's the tuner/gamer market. (I know I know, huge start up costs and an ugly install base. Quake 3's source is available, and Half-Life's Mod scene shows it is possible to make at least one killer app/game. Free (faster) OS + Free 'the next counter-strike' is what Ubuntu/needs to go mainstream.)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Interesting huh? OSX and Linux, the two alternative OS's are not as sucessful because they are too far on either side of the road. OSX has the best OEM integration of any OS, but people
Re: (Score:2)
In other words, If Sony and Dell and Tosh
Re: (Score:2)
I guess it depends on how you look at percieved speed. On Windows, and in Linux, I generally turn off the silly animations, and knock the delay times way down for things like displaying menus (Tweak UI is great fo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Open an empty folder in Windows. There will be a slight pause while it checks to see if there's anything in the folder, then it opens a window. Now do the same on Mac OS. It opens a window instantly and allows you to interact with it.
Now, let's go to the other extreme. Open a jam-packed-full folder on Windows (with more than 1000 items). There will be a long pause as it finds all the stuff in that folder, sorts them, and finally opens a window
Re: (Score:2)
The point remains, though, that barring some weird Finder-network behavior, Macs running OS X are faster and more responsive in perceived user feel than Windows Vista, Ubuntu, or Mandriva 2007--its primary competitors.
No, they're not. OS X is *by far* the most sluggish UI to use out of the relatively mainstream OSes - especially on "average" hardware. I've yet to sit down in front of any Mac without having the beachball appear within 15 minutes of "typical" workload. Not to mention the general slowness
Re: (Score:2)
I had a dual proc quad core with 4 gigs of ram running 10.4.x and it was slower for simple tasks like web browsing than my single processor Dell with 1.5 gigs of ram, if you are talking about perceived speed...
The first is fact, the second is my opinion.
That said, I enjoy OS X a great deal...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Absolutely... (Score:4, Funny)
I believe that more than 1 megabyte of memory is a waste. Indeed, I used to run a medical laboratory with 100 people in it on less memory than that! We didn't have fancy graphics or those ozone-polluting "laser" printers. We had to send people their test results using coded English on paper that didn't fit into any folder on the planet, and had lines on it. If patients need a graph to explain why they are sick then they simply should have stayed healthy!!
I believe that languages like Cocoa, Java and C# are abominations. Real programmers don't make mistakes. Real programmers don't write "garbage" that needs collection. If you make a mistake then you are, by definition, not a programmer. And you and the people you work for and all other people who don't even know who you are, should pay the price of your errors, indefinitely (yes, I do believe that Daniel Bernstein is the living Christ). I believe that all programming problems can be solved in assembly language, and that all other languages have no merit, except C, which can be used if you have urgent work to do.
I believe that we should return to teletypes and 110bps connections and 8 inch floppy disks, because these focussed the mind. I believe that if you can't keep everything that's important to you on a single disk then there is something wrong with you. I want to return the chemistry to photography and the "Super" to video. I want to wait 2 weeks to get my photos back from the drugstore -- only to have the police waiting for me when I pick them up.
I believe that only consumer computer system on the market which does not get regularly flattened by malware consists mostly of bloatware. I believe the design of the plastic that holds the computer is irrelevant, even if it means no protruding edges to break off and a single object to put on my desk. I believe that a computer that can go to sleep instantly is just lazy. I believe, contrary to all recent reviews, that Macs are more expensive than equivalent PCs. I believe that the actual value of the bloatware installed on a Mac, including all of the free applications, is zero.
I believe Vista contains no bloatware and that WINFS was, is and will be a great idea. I believe this because I believe in Market Share and the biggest Market Shareholder is Windows. For some reason I like to allude to market share and Linux in the same sentence, even though the two aren't related.
In short, like you, I am an ignorant, unthinking, luddite troll who makes baseless, disconnected assertions and appears to have lost my humanity. I console myself by knowing that I don't threaten people with violence because of a simple platform preference which is almost certainly based on a more rational analysis than yours.
Re: (Score:2)
HAHAHA, I would have spit milk through my nose if I happened to be drinking it. Thank you for bringing some rationality back - that guy's post was unnerving. I was waiting for him to don a white hooded robe and burn some plastic boxes...
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, right (Score:2)
You know what people want? They want Adobe Photo-fucking-shop. They want Quark Godd
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Saving up for a Core 2 Duo PowerBook, damn I mean MacBook Pro.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Good post otherwise! Well done - reasonably coherent.
Re: (Score:2)
Technically, Macs are PCs (in the general sense of "personal computer") but so are Amigas, SPARCstations, and PDAs. They're not PCs in the sense of "IBM PC and compatibles", which is what people are usually talking about when they talk about "Mac vs. PC".
See this comment [slashdot.org] in the thread you just linked to.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but slashdot is a technical site.
They're not PCs in the sense of "IBM PC and compatibles", which is what people are usually talking about when they talk about "Mac vs. PC".
People who say Mac vs PC in the age of wintel macs are self deluded.
Look up PC in the dictionary.
Re: (Score:2)
People who say Mac vs PC in the age of wintel macs are self deluded.
When you can buy a Mac without OS X, and drop any piece of standard PC hardware in into it without having to worry about weird compatibility issues (eg: "non-Mac" video cards), then you can call it a PC.
Re: (Score:2)
Here's some counter-point. My friend has a PC and he wants a new graphics card. He has an AGP motherboard. So now he has to get a PCI-E board, new memory and a new CPU (possibly). He priced out the parts and ended up getting a completely new rig. I understand drop-in and I understand the weird Mac video Bios reality. But another reality is, PCs are not always a case of "drop any piece of standard PC hardware". Worrying about weird compatibility issues could also mean
Re: (Score:2)
Here's some counter-point. My friend has a PC and he wants a new graphics card. He has an AGP motherboard. So now he has to get a PCI-E board, new memory and a new CPU (possibly).
No, he doesn't. There are quite high-end AGP video cards available new, and buying the last generation's top-end used from eBay will also give excellent performance, even in cutting-edge games.
I know, because I'm in the same position and had to make the same decisions.
He priced out the parts and ended up getting a completely
Re: (Score:2)
PC is short for "Personal Computer" - all your compatibility issues hold true for any pc.
Macs are Personal Computers - PCs. Change the dictionary definition of PC if you think differently.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it's not often we see such an apt username.
PC is short for "Personal Computer" - all your compatibility issues hold true for any pc.
False.
Macs are Personal Computers - PCs. Change the dictionary definition of PC if you think differently.
Please post the dictionary definition of "Mac". Don't forget to cite your source.
Re: (Score:2)
False? Just like that? With no counterargument?
You said:
The same does hold true for non-Mac PCs. Can you buy any video card & drop it in any x86 machine? No. You've got to check AGP, PCI-X, etc compatability. Same holds for RAM, other cards, in fact nearly everything.
The x86 architecture has fragmented hugely, you cannot buy any piece of hardware, drop it into an x8
Re: (Score:2)
False? Just like that? With no counterargument?
There was no counterargument to make. Your statement was wrong.
The same does hold true for non-Mac PCs. Can you buy any video card & drop it in any x86 machine? No. You've got to check AGP, PCI-X, etc compatability. Same holds for RAM, other cards, in fact nearly everything.
The sorts of "compatibility issues" being discussed arise even when appropriate physical and electrical connections are being used.
The x86 architecture has fragmented hugely, you
Re: (Score:2)
Idiot. A mac is an IBM (or intel x86, if you prefer) compatible computer. You can run windows, linux, and all your standard IBM (or intel x86, if you prefer) compatible software with it!
By your own definition, a mac is a subset of PC.
Re: (Score:2)
Idiot. A mac is an IBM (or intel x86, if you prefer) compatible computer.
Please make up your mind.
You can run windows, linux, and all your standard IBM (or intel x86, if you prefer) compatible software with it!
But you can't always use PC standard hardware with it. Ergo, it's not a PC in the colloqial sense - as pointed out in my first post.
By your own definition, a mac is a subset of PC.
Then, by the definition of "subset", a Mac is not a PC.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And four months later... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are a bunch of rough edges such as bytes/sec deleted not being updated when emptying the recycle bin. Err, just like XP then.
It'll be interesting to see whether there are reports of widespread instabil
Bad year due to the new consoles too (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
It's always possible my perception is just a reflection of the undeniable fact that I'm getting old
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If they manage to end up making money form the xbox 360, then it may not be a mistake. I think in this regards, Microsoft knew many people wanted consoles and had to compensate, hence in the xbox and xbox 360. This is even more true as console increasingly become networkable. Currently the real advantages the P
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can only name a single new PC game that isn't geared towards immature audiences: Flight Simulator X. The rest, including Bully (or "Canis Canem Edit" as it's sold as in Europe), are definitely marketed towards the sub-35 crowd, and not mature audiences (
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if the PS3 is reasonably successful it must be taking a big chunk out of the 500-600$ gaming PC market. I can't imagine they manage to sell it to the same 300$ market that Wii/xbox360 is aiming for. PS3 looks like the console for all the people that go "Yeah, I would like a simple console and not fiddle around with my PC all the time, and multiplayer would be nice... but PAL/NTSC graphics? I've had better on my PC now fo
Re: (Score:2)
Let me save everyone the trouble (Score:2)
The linux discount for Christmas '06 (Score:2)
Call me an idealist but it has to happen at some point. Maybe price pressures and demand falling off will drive the linux and free software adoption we've all been waiting for.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Get real.
Systems will ship OEM activated. Or it will be a one time, one click, event for the vast majority of users---who do not pull motherboards as often as they change their underwear and socks.
You know the one with Ubuntu or SUSE installed, paying $50-100 less for that new PC.
OEM Linux is dead and buried at Walmart.com.
MSDOS and Windows have been in the home for twenty-five years. No one is going to trade that investment in hardware, software, peripherals an
Re: (Score:2)
office max had an external 160 GB USB drive on sale for $80.
compatability with Windows isn't advertised, it is simply assummed to be part of the deal.
Not so. Freespire, for example is free (though one variant is not completely open source). Linspire costs OEMs... what? $500 a year for as many installations as you like? That's maybe 10 or 20 copies of Windows OEM.
There are enormous economies of scale in b
Re: (Score:2)
Call me an idealist but it has to happen at some point. Maybe price pressures and demand falling off will drive the linux and free software adoption we've all been waiting for.
Make me wonder why PC memory is so expensive though. Anyone else notice they are high? PC, $500, 1GB aditioanl RAM, $180. Makes no sense.
Re: (Score:2)
No, they're getting a Mac, and someone "inherits" their latest-and-greatest pc, which after only 1 year of use, is so slow that they don't even want to hear about re-installing, malware, antiviruses, etc. And no, they don't want to hear about linx, because they were stupid enough to ignore my initial advice - again!!! and they paid extra for name-brand, instead o
Not surprised (Score:2, Insightful)
This was Fall 2001. Windows XP wasn't quite out yet, but was more or less supposed to be. I got a Dell with Windows ME installed. In polite terms, it blew
Re: (Score:2)
I've handled this as follows. You call tech support and they say that it's sales. Then you first say, OK, what's your name. Write it down. Then you ask him to patch you through AFTER he's conferred with his sales colleague to make sure h
Might buy now, but I'd be wary (Score:2)
Where that Win95 upgrade caused pain later were all tho
Snap. (Score:2)
apt-get dist-upgrade
dependancy nightmare!
Re: (Score:2)
His box came with win9x+fat32 installed, and a "promised upgrade" to xp home+ntfx, which we all know just doesn't work.
I remember people replacing their motherboards, their cpus, their video cards, their power supplies, thinking it must have been some sort of hardware problem when they couldn't get both a fat32 and an ntfs partition to co-exist without BSODs every 5 minutes.
Re: (Score:2)
Just how many computers can we buy? (Score:3, Insightful)
I am thinking the sources behind this article have stock in Dell and other afflicted manufaturers. Dell will probably see a short-term loss of laptop sales due to their bad press from the exploding batteries. What better way to hedge your losses than say the entire laptop market is slowing in growth, rather than Dell simply losing sales to a competitor? It'll take months for the actual sales numbers to come in, and by then everyone will have forgotten about these stories.
Be wary of any such article around crucial marketing periods like the winter holidays (just as you should be cautious of TV execs hyping up their shows during sweeps periods). Many brokers and firms can make-or-break a large profits during the next two months, all hinging on how well they predicted holiday sales figures from earlier in the year, and not everyone is a neutral party.
Re: (Score:2)
The bigger issue is that PC speed increases
Noise cancelling headphones? (Score:2)
Good news for me! (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Is this capitalism? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh rubbish. Vista Beta 2 ran just fine on the PC I built myself from components in February.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Apple needs to develop a migration tool (Score:2)
Apple offers free data migration already (Score:2)
http://www.apple.com/macosx/switch/ [apple.com]
Or you can buy the Move2Mac software and DIY.
Flat hardware sales shouldn't be a surprise (Score:3, Interesting)
PC technology is getting more mature so I'm not surprised to see sales flatten out. Home computers were already far more powerful than the average person ever needed almost ten years ago. Today they're over-powered to the point the average user can get by years longer before there's compelling reason to buy a new machine.
I would consider myself a power user, built all my own PC's. Some of them are going on five years old and there's no compelling reason to upgrade them. I can work, play games, watch TV or movies...why do I need a new computer? Okay, they're not the hottest and fastest boxes on the market. So what? They're fast enough for me. The weak link in the PC interface is sitting in the chair. No matter how fast a PC is, absolute speed is going to be limited at some point by the user. You can only type so fast and take in so much information. Any mid-range machine today can stay ahead of the user in terms of information flow.
Another trend impacting white box PC sales is the proliferation of specialty PC devices like game consoles, mp3 players and appliances like Blackberry. Those off-load what were traditional PC tasks. Where did PC makers think the growth was going to come from? If they think they have it bad now, just wait until the $100.00 laptops (now $175.00 I think) start flooding the market.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The conclusion as to why is stupid (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Multicore Wars (Score:2)
A lot of posters have said that people aren't buying new PCs because what they have is fast enough. Those posters are right. But there still do exist people who, for whatever reason, would like a new computer. Laptops, for instance, don't last forever.
Those people, if they are wise, are waiting for the dust to settle after the mulicore wars.
Processor technology had been stagnating, but now competition is heating up again between Intel and AMD. If I buy this year, something significantly better may c
Re: (Score:2)
And customers who do a lot of multimedia editing now enjoy the benefits of dual-core CPU technology, too. Dual cores make it possible to edit still images from digital still cameras, video from MiniDV/MicroDV camcorders, and audio far faster than ever before.
My opinion on this (Score:2)
Where are the 10GHz CPUs ? Where are even the 5GHz CPUs ? Where are the 8 or 16GB RAM machines ? Have the component-makers stopped improving ?
No wonder people are not buying, it seems like PC technology stopped improving 4 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My Plan (Score:2)
However, my laptop is a sub-$1000 Averat
I went looking... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
OS X (Score:2)
Seriously, if apple doesn't snag this moment, for the sake of software relicencing...
2c.
Re: (Score:2)
Upgrade is fair enough, but lately, the main players, Intel and AMD, have made it exceedingly difficult to upgrade, and the only real option is to replace. I'm sure that AMD and Intel counted on us tossing out our less-than-a-year old computers and buying new ones because upgrades aren't available anymore, but I'm not surprised that this tactic
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why? To build your own system you have to know exactly which CPU will work together with which motherboard; you need a stock of those tiny screws for mounting drives and if it doesn't work because of hardware incompatibility, because you zapped a component with a static discharge, or because you just bent a pin the first time you inserted a CPU, you're on your own. There are plenty
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nonsense... go with a motherboard bundle from a shop like MWave.com where they'll put together the bundle (and test it) for only $9. Well worth it (and I build half a dozen systems per year) because they do the research leg work for me.
Cases come with bags of screws (Antec, Lian Li).
You can do a dual-core, 2GB RAM machine for about $600 assuming all new parts. Office Pro and WinXP Pro will add anoth
Re: (Score:2)
who in the hell would want a ready-built computer for him/herself? technology is so good right now, assembling one is easier than ever.
Your kidding right?
PC componet distributors prices make it pretty hard to beat and packaged (with credible warranty) system from a local store. I have built some 9 or more systems in my day but can't beat what they do today. Hard rives seem cheap but memory is priced stupid.
Ya, 98% of the PCs ship with "shared" video, which we all know is CRAP. Saves them $10 in a cou
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, really? I'd like to see that...the cost of buying components in massive bulk versus me buying them one off. Mind you, I gave up comparing a couple of years ago, for two reasons:
who in the hell would want a ready-built computer for him/herself?
Me. It easily will take two hours to sort through the myriad of options on-line, and then, once the stu
Re: (Score:2)
You don't need an MPEG encoder for HDTV. You're just grabbing the MPEG-2 transport stream that is already encoded.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I was just about to build an all-new PC, then RAM prices skyrocketed. It's ridiculous, getting 2 gb costs like $70 more in Australia now.
I guess they are price fixing again. Likely stockpiling the memory chips for the Vista roll out. Seems higher now for the same bytes as it did 3 years ago. My guess is after Vista splashes and another price fixing suit threat they will fall.
http://news.com.com/Government+finds+witness+in + RAM+price-fixing+probe/2100-1004_3-5347423.html
And old story, but still valid.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't think of any other industry that would say a 7.9% growth rate is killing them...
What about tombstone carvers?