Forgent Settles JPEG Patent Cases 167
eldavojohn writes "As many of you know, the JPEG image compression is actually proprietary. This has resulted in many lawsuits between its owner, Forgent Networks, and other companies that have used it. Yesterday Microsoft and about 60 other defendants settled with Forgent to the tune of $8 million. For a company with annual revenues of $15 million, that's nothing to sneeze at. You haven't heard the last of Forgent yet, as the article states, 'It is currently pursuing claims against cable companies over a patent that it says covers technology inside digital video recorders.' Sounds like that one could be worth a little bit of cash, wouldn't you think?"
Isn't it funny.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Isn't it funny.. (Score:3, Insightful)
hey, a patent I don't really have a problem with! (Score:3, Insightful)
jpeg compression is nontrivial. The guy(s) that came up with it should be able to make a living off their hard work.
Re:hey, a patent I don't really have a problem wit (Score:3, Insightful)
While I do agree with you, it's kind of funny how the only reason it's really worth anything is because it's used so much. And the only reason it's used so much is because people used it without paying the license fee.
Same can be said for gif and mp3... I recognize that that's no excuse, but it's kind of funny anyways. Had the patent been enforced from day zero, it wouldn't have nearly as much worth.