Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Viral Fossil Brought Back To Life 320

hey hey hey writes "In a controversial study, researchers have resurrected a retrovirus that infected our ancestors millions of years ago and now sits frozen in the human genome. Published online by Genome Research this week, the study may shed new light on the history of these genomic intruders, as well as their role in tumors. Although this particular virus, dubbed Phoenix, is a wimpy one, some argue that resuscitating any ancient virus is inherently risky and that the study should have undergone stricter reviews."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Viral Fossil Brought Back To Life

Comments Filter:
  • Andromeda strain (Score:3, Insightful)

    by zeroharmada ( 1004484 ) on Wednesday November 01, 2006 @09:17PM (#16683129)
    need I say more
  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna ( 970587 ) on Wednesday November 01, 2006 @09:31PM (#16683283) Journal
    If human beings were designed, it seems to be a poor design to include copies of viruses in it. But we mere mortal humble human beings dont have the intellect to fathom the Divine Intentions. All we can say for sure is that, unless you pay the priest 10% of your income and get dunked in a pool you will rot in Hell.
  • by thefirelane ( 586885 ) on Wednesday November 01, 2006 @09:59PM (#16683555)
    The resultant virus was disabled so that, after replicating once in a cell, the daughter viruses could not replicate. So there was no risk.

    Life will find a way.... have you learnt nothing?
  • by E++99 ( 880734 ) on Wednesday November 01, 2006 @10:20PM (#16683713) Homepage
    Only 3% of the genome is genes, the rest is junk DNA...

    Based on what? We only JUST mapped out the 3% that encodes protiens (the genes). Science does not know what the rest of the DNA does or does not do. There is certainly no study that I can find that offers proof that it is unused. It's the furthering of the trend of treating ignorance as if it were knowledge. If they had intellectual honesty, instead of proclaiming DNA 97% junk, they'd proclaim themselves 97% ignorant. Labeling of it as "junk," especially in our infancy, or rather fetushood, of understanding DNA, is the absolute pinnacle of scientific arrogance. Maybe next they'll look up at the sky, and seeing clear proof of life around one star, and none around the others, declare all the rest "junk stars."

Math is like love -- a simple idea but it can get complicated. -- R. Drabek

Working...