Networking For Overconvenience 116
Roland Piquepaille writes "For several decades now, we've read that our homes will become smart and that we'll have many robotic slaves at our service. But it's never really worked. A recent European initiative called TEAHA (short for 'The European Application Home Alliance') wants to give another try, and it has enrolled some big industrial partners to make all our appliances interoperate seamlessly. Imagine a message on your TV telling you it's time to start the laundry! Read more for additional details and illustrations describing the concepts."
internetworked.. or just more reliable/precise? (Score:5, Insightful)
advertising.. the wave of the future (Score:5, Insightful)
Imagine, popup advertising following you around the house!
What the? (Score:4, Insightful)
If that's the best example they can come up with, then I don't have high hopes for this technology. Seriously guys, if you want to get consumers to buy all-new networked home appliances then at least present us with a decent reason why.
Consider the other side too... (Score:4, Insightful)
To make matters worse, there have been studies that support the fact that pregnant women stressed by all these gadgets/technology, are more likely to have kids with severe mental or psychotic problems. Do you know that the chances of a kid getting a brain disorder are just 1 in 166? It iused to be 1 in 11000 in the late sixties.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah.. shopping for a microwave-oven:
-Does it have firewall embedded?
-Yes, with antispyware and phishing filters that call home, too!
New DRM platform... (Score:2, Insightful)
or
"Sorry, sir, but your credit card has been maxed out. You may not enter your home."
No thanks!
Is this actually useful? (Score:5, Insightful)
Rolan fuckhead (Score:1, Insightful)
God damn asshat, I hope he dies soon. I really do.
Or atleast I want to kick him in the crotch as soon as possible. Fucking annoying bullshitter. I want these kind of fuckheads OUT. He doesn't know _anything_ about technology, but writes these exciting headlines every-god-damn-week to drive hits to his shitty blog.
Re:Is this actually useful? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Consider the other side too... (Score:2, Insightful)
Standardization (Score:4, Insightful)
Life-changing technology? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What the? (Score:2, Insightful)
Computer can already do this. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Standardization (Score:3, Insightful)
Tell your house to get up off its foundation...... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Consider the other side too... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What the? (Score:3, Insightful)
I'd like my alarm clock to start my coffee maker, myself. I'd like it to be smart enough to only do that if it knows it's been refilled (water level sensor, easy). I don't want to bother setting both. I mean, I can live without it, but if it were possible, easy, and cheap, why not?
Knowing the appliance manufacturers though, there would probably be 50 different communication protocols for this to happen, twice as many interfaces, and ten times that number of bugs in the overall system.