Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Networking For Overconvenience 116

Roland Piquepaille writes "For several decades now, we've read that our homes will become smart and that we'll have many robotic slaves at our service. But it's never really worked. A recent European initiative called TEAHA (short for 'The European Application Home Alliance') wants to give another try, and it has enrolled some big industrial partners to make all our appliances interoperate seamlessly. Imagine a message on your TV telling you it's time to start the laundry! Read more for additional details and illustrations describing the concepts."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Networking For Overconvenience

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 21, 2006 @06:28AM (#16527041)
    Hello

    What sources for your statistic about mental health? (it's not that I disagree, I don't know anything about this subject, it's only that I find this astonishing)

    JP
  • Re:Rolan fuckhead (Score:3, Informative)

    by WhodoVoodoo ( 319477 ) on Saturday October 21, 2006 @06:45AM (#16527109)
    Well that took much less time than anticipated.

    http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/5738 [userscripts.org]

    No more roland piquipaki! Thanks to Brendan Donahue, script author.
  • by Lars512 ( 957723 ) on Saturday October 21, 2006 @07:18AM (#16527217)

    Nobody knew that these cellphones, together with similar technology would contribute to the increase in our stress levels.

    It does seem that the tech making everybody more productive just increased expectations on productivity, and thus increased stress. I'm not sure there's any way around it though, without getting less done. Of course, some people just choose to get less done, earn less and have a less stressful life.

    Do you know that the chances of a kid getting a brain disorder are just 1 in 166? It iused to be 1 in 11000 in the late sixties.

    Common reasons for such increased statistics include better reporting, better diagnosis, and sometimes changing definitions of illness. Wading through these factors, then we can work out if the stat is still valid. Out of curiousity, got a ref for the study?

  • by hcdejong ( 561314 ) <hobbes@nOspam.xmsnet.nl> on Saturday October 21, 2006 @11:19AM (#16528341)
    dream of the day that I won't have to posess bank-burglar safe-cracker finger dexterity to get my shower to the exact temperature I desire, but rather I can just dial in a digital thermostat to 102.5F or whatever suits me.

    Apart from the digital input, these already exist. Companies like Grohe produce thermostatic faucets like these [groheamerica.com].
    They typically have two knobs, one to set the temperature, and one to set the amount of water. I've been using these for years, and (provided you get a good one, and not a cheap-ass B-brand) they work perfectly. They're not exactly cheap (>$100), but worth it. Temperature control is to sub-1 degree C accuracy.
  • by Alsee ( 515537 ) on Saturday October 21, 2006 @12:11PM (#16528685) Homepage
    Here's a technical PDF [utwente.nl] on the system. Guess what? This is a Trusted Computing system!

    It specifies devices to contain security module / security component. It specifies that this security component contains a crypto key and that the owner is forbidden to know or read his own keys (that is what they mean when the PDF says "non cloneable"). It specifies using public key cryptography for chips to exchange communication keys in a manner secure against the owner, and specifies Confidentiality as establishing communication links which are secure against the owner "eavesdropping" on his own data. It specifies Authenticity capabilites, meaning that neither the owner nor any competitor can produce a device that can be substituted in your own network in place of a given device. Any attempt at an interoperable substitution will lack the required manufacturer's cryptographic key and signature to authenticate the device, and other devices can reject the substitute and reject its connections and prohibit it from operating in the original device's place.

    Every time the PDF uses the word secure or security, it is used in the sense of securing the system against the owner. The PDF literally classifies the owner as an "intruder" at one point, and to be secure against him.

    -

Kleeneness is next to Godelness.

Working...