RIAA Drops Case In Chicago 229
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes, "The RIAA has dropped the Elektra v. Wilke case in Chicago. This is the case in which Mr. Wilke had moved for summary judgment, stating that: '1. He is not "Paule Wilke" which is the name he was sued under. 2. He has never possessed on his computer any of the songs listed in exhibit A [the list of songs the RIAA's investigator downloaded]. He only had a few of the songs from exhibit B [the screenshot] on his computer, and those were from legally purchased CDs owned by Mr. Wilke. 3. He has never used any "online media distribution system" to download, distribute, or make available for distribution, any of plaintiffs' copyrighted recordings.' The RIAA's initial response to the summary judgment motion, prior to dropping the case, had been to cross-move for discovery, indicating that it did not have enough evidence with which to defeat Mr. Wilke's summary judgment motion. P2pnet had termed the Wilke case yet another RIAA blunder."
the dogs (Score:5, Funny)
Your Honor... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Leave it to the RIAA (Score:2, Funny)
I rest your case.
Congresscritters (Score:3, Funny)
I wish the 4 or 5 people that still use that Limbaugh-favoured term would stop doing so.
To me, a 'critter' is a fuzzy little (possibly annoying) animal or pest. Are vultures, sharks, sloths and blood-sucking leeches also called 'critters' in your vernacular?
Re:Change in attitude? (Score:3, Funny)
Perhaps Mr. Wilke wouldn't be in this situation... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Congresscritters (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Anyone noticed (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Why?? (Score:4, Funny)
You misspelled money.
Spartacus (Score:3, Funny)
{stands up} No, I am Paule Wilke
{sits back down}