Perspectives on Spamhaus's Dilemma 420
The Illinois court that told Spamhaus to stop blocking the spammer filing suit against them — an order which Spamhaus ignored — is now considering ordering ICANN to pull Spamhaus's domain records. While Gadi Evron, whose blog posting is linked above, urges everyone to beat the judge with a clue stick, a guest writer on his blog counsels much greater restraint. Anti-spam lawyer Matthew Prince explains how Spamhaus got into its current pickle — apparently by following conflicting legal advice at two points in the process — and what they might have to do to get out. One spamfighter of my acquaintance says that Spamhaus's SBL and XBL blocklists knock out 75% of the spam at his servers before it hits and requires more CPU-intensive filtering. If ICANN is ordered to unplug Spamhaus from the DNS, and does so, is the Net prepared to deal with a 4-fold increase in spam hitting MTAs overnight?
The odour of bullshit (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Its a stupid arguement. (Score:4, Funny)
Also, we can express our concerns directly to them at http://www.e360insight.com/contact.php [e360insight.com]. They were nice enough to have a comment submission form. I hope they have a lot of disk space for submitted comments.
Re:Would you like spam with that? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Go ahead - there's ALWAYS a workaround (Score:1, Funny)
Down with Illinois (Score:1, Funny)
Re:The Q-Tip Solution... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Ghostbusters (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Ghostbusters (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Ghostbusters (Score:3, Funny)
In a nutshell: I agree, the Illinois has no dick.
Obviously this is wrong - it has a huge dick who wears a black robe.