Freedb.org Returns to Life

Trogre writes "The recently troubled free CD database freedb has been picked up by a group called Magix. From Kaiser's blog: 'Following my announcement that I would like to let freedb go, I was approached by many interested parties ... Even if I shall no longer be actively associated with freedb, I shall continue casting a critical glance on freedb's future. The decision in favour of MAGIX has given us a new prospect of further development, offered a congenial and comfortable atmosphere during difficult negotiations, and provided the newly implemented hardware with generous capacities.' This might be good news since Grip still doesn't support MusicBrainz."

MusicBrainz

[BobNET]

Most FreeDB/CDDB clients can access MusicBrainz through a CDDB gateway: http://musicbrainz.org/doc/CddbGateway [musicbrainz.org]

Re:Freedb2?

[Trogre]

It seems to have stagnated, possibly due to immense suspicion from everyone except the single developer. The project had been using modified GPL'd code from freedb without disclosing any substantial source code. It was this issue that caused the head freedb dev (Kaiser) to 'take action' against this guy without the consent of the other two devs who left and AFAIK are now part of neither project.

They seem to have taken it a bit personally if you ask me, but then again there might have been more going on than publically stated.

MusicBrainz is superior to FreeDB

[pen]

CDDB and FreeDB are old news. MusicBrainz [musicbrainz.org] is by far superior. It accounts for different release years, different formats, multiple artists, compilation albums, etc. "Why would I need to use your site? What's wrong with FreeDB?" [musicbrainz.org].

I'm not affiliated, just another happy user.

Re:They should make the database public

[sdo1]

OK... public appology here. Me = moron.

http://www.freedb.org/en/download__database.10.htm l [freedb.org]

I could have sworn that I'd loooked for that before and couldn't find it.

-S (feeling like a dipshit)

Re:Freedb2?

[Horar]

Once again I would like to set the record straight. http://freedb2.org/ [freedb2.org] was written from scratch by myself with no reference to any of the original freedb code whatsoever, and I am the sole copyright owner on all of that code. It was derived strictly from the published cddb specifications and the contents of the database itself. You are right in thinking that there was much more going on that was publicly stated.

http://freedb2.org/ [freedb2.org] continues to thrive and grow and has been very well supported. I would like to thank everybody for that, and can guarantee that you will be able to enjoy the superior levels of service offered by freedb2.org for a long time to come. Please feel free to email me directly should you have any specific questions about it.

Re:MusicBrainz is superior to FreeDB

[shish]

No FreeDB booster was ever able to sufficiently explain to me why, for example, Hotel California should be listed under New Age.

IIRC, it's because the database entries are plain text files named "[genre]/[CD checksum].txt" -- if two different CDs have the same checksum, then they have to be in different genres. Also, one can't update the genre of a CD once entered, you can only create a new entry somewhere else.

Re:Not clear that the GFDL/GPL can cover the datab

[indifferent children]

The legalities of applying the GFDL or GPL to a database like the one managed by freedb.org are unclear.

IANAL, however as I understand it under US law: it is not possible to apply any license to this database, because the licenses are grants of rights, based on the copyright of the owner. However, copyright does not apply to this data. No one can hold a copyright on 'facts', only 'expressions'. A clearly stated (though no more authoritative) explanation from the 'copyright' article on wikipedia:

Compilations of facts or data may also be copyrighted, but such a copyright is thin; it only applies to the particular selection and arrangement of the included items, not to the particular items themselves.