French Government Recommends Standardizing on ODF 210
Juha-Matti Laurio writes "From the InfoWorld article:
All French government publications should be made available in OpenDocument Format (ODF), according to a report commissioned by the French prime minister. The new report
also suggests that France ask its European partners to do likewise when exchanging documents at a European level. It is recommended that the government will fund a research center dedicated to open-source software security as well, adds the article."
How long before the Microsoft rebuttal report? (Score:1, Interesting)
ohhh, finally a standard! (Score:2, Interesting)
The headline should read "French Government Recommends Standardizing on ODF, too!"
Because most people use
The real news here is the big F-U to Microsoft: We are sick of using only your software. Our governments are beginning to reccommend using alternate methods because we do not trust you. If you continue to develop software the way you do, we will proceed with our plans to isolate our governments from you. To illustrate, TFA:
-- Technological Independence. It is almost like there is going to be a Bretagne Tea Party, complete with euro-geeks dumping crates of Microsoft software into the Atlantic; What a sight they would be acting out in defiance of a monopoly of taxation without defragmentation. Bleh. Not bloody likely. Bring on the funding for OSS security, François!
Re:How long before the Microsoft rebuttal report? (Score:5, Interesting)
Basically, and from what I heard, the idea is to first swith the Windows softwares the administration uses to equivalent softwares that do exist on other OS the ultimate goal being to switch from Windows to Linux when all the applications are replaced. I guess the ODF switch is just another step in that direction.
Government websites and web services are already all built on open source software. I'm happy to hear that my government is spending less on windows licences and I do really hope that they'll make it and that it will be used as an example for other European countries.
Re:The French attitude (Score:2, Interesting)
but your "french attitude" is a bit missplaced .. if u want a sample of stubborness in applying standards, u better look at the UK.
... they "proudly" refused napoleon's standard and kind of forgot they use the left side of the road because the romans imposed that on them ... they refused the metric system and also forgot that their system was imposed by another conqueror (the measurement system based on multiples of 3, 4 and the dozen is actually germanic)
;)
they are quite funny in that respect too
history is quite funny sometimes
Re:The French attitude (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:You can have any flavor you like, if it's vanil (Score:3, Interesting)
Open standards actually encourage innovation because no one has to write their own e-mail protocol or web protocol. It also does not hinder the adoption of new products because if I can just replace my current e-mail client with a new one seamlessly, I'm more likely to try it out.
This is why MS Word is the defacto standard. Because it's the best product? No, because anytime someone else tried to come out with a different product there was a high barrier to entry because the new word processor would not be able to use the current word processor files.
I think Open Standards help innovation because they allow anyone to create new software that can be easily adopted. The only person they don't help is any current monopoly. And as others have mentioned, if a newer, better way of doing things come up, there's no reason you couldn't adopt the new standard while retaining backwards compatibility with the old open format.
Re:The French attitude (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:much more hardcore (Score:2, Interesting)
There are risks to legislating compatibility. However, in this case, legislation is probably required.
Re:You can have any flavor you like, if it's vanil (Score:3, Interesting)
I know all about that. I work in DTP and have had to deal with all kinds of files. Now of course when people say "file" they mean "MSWord file", and are baffled at the idea that there is any alternative, which makes me rather sad; especailly as I am forced to use this myself. But "MSWord file" is no guarantee of compatibility. After a file has been passed back and forth between several people the style, layout, spelling, fonts, page size.... all change with no one really knowing how or why. A good part of my work is stripping layers of crap from such files before I can actually get to the creative part of the job.