Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

US Population to Top 300 Million 792

An anonymous reader writes "The number of Americans will surpass 300 million this month, a milestone that raises environmental impact questions for the only major industrial nation whose population is increasing substantially. The US census bureau says the 300 million mark will be reached 39 years after US population topped 200 million and 91 years after it exceeded 100 million. That makes US the third most populous country behind china and india. It is noteworthy that sheer number of human beings do not necessarily have the heaviest impact on the environment. Instead environmental impact is a calculation that involves population, affluence and technology. The US consumes nearly 25% of the world's energy though it has only 5% of the world's population and has the highest per capita oil consumption worldwide. Each American produces about 2.3 kg of trash a day, a rate about 5 times that in developing countries."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Population to Top 300 Million

Comments Filter:
  • Plenty of Room (Score:5, Informative)

    by CrazyTalk ( 662055 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @08:39AM (#16303517)
    The population of the US may be increasing, but only in certain desirable areas. The "Rust Belt" - cities like Buffalo, Cleveland, Detroit, and Pittsburgh - continues to shrink. Pittsburgh alone has lost over HALF of its population from nearly 700,000 in the 1960s to barely over 300,000 today (and not just due to people leaving for the suburbs). If you're willing to tolerate the winters there's plenty of room up here!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @08:54AM (#16303709)
    You mean from North Korea?
  • by Sinbios ( 852437 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @08:57AM (#16303741) Homepage
    Uh, if nobody uses the energy then the power companies will simply generate less. Thus less usage of natural resources (fossil fuels, etc) and pollution.
  • Re:Plenty of Room (Score:2, Informative)

    by (A)*(B)!0_- ( 888552 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @09:10AM (#16303919)
    Just to be pedantic...

    The smallest state in the US is Rhode Island, at 1,045 square miles.
    The UK is 152,124 square miles. So no, you're not the size of the Rhode Island, you're larger.

  • Re:Plenty of Room (Score:3, Informative)

    by kfg ( 145172 ) * on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @09:24AM (#16304199)
    . . . we're not even the size of America's smallest state.

    Correct. You are our 12th largest state. Rather larger than my home state of NY, which could fit several of the smaller states inside it.

    Our smallest state has an area of only 1500 square miles, much is which is actually nothing more than tidal marsh.

    And despite some claims to the contrary, we're not particularly overcrowded. . .

    How many wild bears and big cats do you have left? If the answer is "none" I'll join the group that thinks you're overcrowded.

    KFG
  • Re:Perspective (Score:2, Informative)

    by wired_LAIN ( 974675 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @09:26AM (#16304221)
    Depends how you define "global output". Germany is the world's largest exporter. The USA is the world's largest importer.
    Just because we have a large GDP does not mean that the extra energy that we use goes into producing more "stuff". It just means that we're much richer than most other countries so the average US citizen can consume a lot more. (For instance, using dryers rather than hanging out laundry, etc)
  • Per Capita Oil Usage (Score:5, Informative)

    by ev0l ( 87708 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @09:51AM (#16304657)
    According to Nation Master [nationmaster.com], who gets there information from the CIA fact book, the USA is 17th in oil consumption per capita.

    Interesting to note: Luxembourg is number 7 and most of the largest consumers per capita are Island Nations.
  • by Ash Vince ( 602485 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @10:00AM (#16304841) Journal
    America still has all their natural resources left.
    Us in Europe used all of ours rather heavily in the last centuary.

    Whereas at the time the Indians in Amnerica at the time were managing a country that would last them an enternity.

    Unfortunately for them us Europeans used our natural resources to steal it from them and create the United States as it is today.
  • BZZZT (Score:4, Informative)

    by ThinWhiteDuke ( 464916 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @10:23AM (#16305223)
    And with it's roughly 25% usage of the world's energy supplies (including oil) what does the US do with it? Create an even greater percentage of the world's goods

    WRONG [wikipedia.org]

    World GDP = 60,000 Bn
    US GDP = 12,000 Bn
    Share of US in World GDP : 20%

    Amazingly enough, the US are less energy efficient than the RoW.
    If you're looking for an exceptionally efficient economy, try the EU.
  • US GDP $8.2B??? WTF (Score:2, Informative)

    by michaelepley ( 239861 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @11:11AM (#16305953) Homepage
    According to the CIA factbook [cia.gov]....$12.36 trillion! Next time either don't use unreliable sources, i.e. http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/Historical_Statistics /horizontal-file_2006.xls [ggdc.net], or read/transcribe them correctly.
  • by TheGavster ( 774657 ) * on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @12:22PM (#16307161) Homepage
    The general figure for the number of illegal immigrants living in the US is 10 million. Out of a population of 300 million, that's 3.3%. I hardly think that by exploiting that small slice of the population we can reap greater rewards than countries where 100% of the population can be exploited. If US labor were cheap, our jobs wouldn't be hemmoraging overseas.
  • by lionheart1327 ( 841404 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @03:57PM (#16310689)
    Uh, 70% of American debt is held by American citizens.

    So stop using the bullshit "other countries buy all their debt" line.
  • by Atanamis ( 236193 ) on Wednesday October 04, 2006 @04:18PM (#16311015)
    Amazingly enough, the US are less energy efficient than the RoW.
    If you're looking for an exceptionally efficient economy, try the EU.

    This post struck me as interesting enough to do the research. The numbers were pulled together from various sources (linked) and may be incorrect. The computations did present the image of a HIGHLY efficient US workforce though, which manages to produce 20% of the world's GDP with only 5% of the population.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_ GDP_(PPP) [wikipedia.org]
    WORLD GDP = 61,078,260 => 100.0%
    US GDP = 12,277,583 => 20.1%
    EU GDP = 12,427,413 => 20.0%
    China GDP = 9,412,361 => 15.0%
    http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/iea/wecbtu.html [doe.gov]
    World Energy = 353 Quads => 100.0%
    US Energy = 87.6 Quads => 24.8%
    China Energy = 60 Quads => 17.0%
    EU Energy = 75.45 Quads => 21.2%
    (These numbers taken from Google)
    World Population ~ 6,500,000,000 => 100.0%
    US Population = 295,734,134 => 4.6%
    EU population = 457,030,418 => 7.0%
    China population = 1,306,313,812 => 20.0%
    Summary:
    US produces 20% of GDP with 25% of the energy and 5% of the population
    EU produces 20% of GDP with 21% of the energy and 7% of the population
    China produces 15% of GDP with 15% of the energy and 20% of the population

    32% of the global population produces 55% of the wealth using 60% of the energy.

"And remember: Evil will always prevail, because Good is dumb." -- Spaceballs

Working...