Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Google Calls For Power Supply Design Changes 377

Raindance writes "The New York Times reports that Google is calling 'for a shift from multivoltage power supplies to a single 12-volt standard. Although voltage conversion would still take place on the PC motherboard, the simpler design of the new power supply would make it easier to achieve higher overall efficiencies ... The Google white paper argues that the opportunity for power savings is immense — by deploying the new power supplies in 100 million desktop PC's running eight hours a day, it will be possible to save 40 billion kilowatt-hours over three years, or more than $5 billion at California's energy rates.' This may have something to do with the electricity bill for Google's estimated 450,000 servers."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Calls For Power Supply Design Changes

Comments Filter:
  • by JavaManJim ( 946878 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:03PM (#16206791)
    You can say goodbye to USB powered devices. An example would be the canned drink cooler.

    Thanks,
    Jim
  • Re:No... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TheSHAD0W ( 258774 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:03PM (#16206793) Homepage
    Considering how many machines Google has to maintain, I'm surprised they just don't order motherboards and power supplies to their own spec, and then allow the mfrs to distribute the design to others who request it. They're big enough and have enough whuffie that they can start a trend all by their lonesomes.
  • by zootjeff ( 531575 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:07PM (#16206855)
    For your 12 volt battery that can vary more than 10% as it discharges, you'll need something like what I have designed for use in cars. Some motherboard makers already make computers that run on 12 volts. The Commell LV-673NS Pentium M Mini-ITX Mainboard already runs on 12 volts (+- 5%), and then if you use the Mpegbox DSX12V which is 95+ efficient, then it can run off a battery or in a car.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:09PM (#16206887)
    The motherboard itself is an outdated concept. It's no longer really necessary if you've dealt with small form factor boards you can easily see that the boards are just a substrate to stick the chips on and for that a flat board-like surface doesn't make sense. What you really need is a cubic cartridge like device that gives you access to more surface area for interfaces close to the memory and CPUs and other chips in a smaller area. It would also facilitate cooling reducing power requirements at the system level.
  • by Bing Tsher E ( 943915 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:12PM (#16206953) Journal
    Mabye you're correct, but the dual rail +12/-12 needed for 'RS-232' is easily generated right in the interface chip with a few capacitors. Said chip only needs +5v to operate.

    Of course, 'violations' of the voltage on 'Rs-232' ports has historically been really really common. Old PCs often had problems operating with serial mice, because the voltage span on the RS-232 ports on some machines was only a few volts. I remember an old Northgate 386 at work that had that problem.
  • Why not -48? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by AaronW ( 33736 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:15PM (#16206995) Homepage
    A lot of telco equipment is designed to run on -48 volts DC and PC and server power supplies are readily available at this voltage.

    The advantage of -48 over 12 volts is that there will be less loss through resistance and smaller conductors can be used. Of course, there is a greater risk of electric shock, but I would think -48 would be pretty safe.

    48 volts is also the standard for Power over Ethernet (IEEE 802.3af) [wikipedia.org]. This may not be compatible, though, since telcos run -48, not +48, though some equipment can operate with either (though some cannot).
  • Re:No... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by MoxFulder ( 159829 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:16PM (#16207011) Homepage
    Yeah, Google hires experts on anything pretty much, I'm told.

    Apparently they hired expert ergonomic and industrial designers to figure out how many servers and workstations they could cram into a mobile semi-trailer lab, while still making it comfortable to work in. Kind of a neat optimization problem I think.
  • by sebol ( 112743 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:20PM (#16207083) Homepage
    it make sense...

    Next generation computer should have 12v plug and special cable, so that it can take 12v source from outside.
    What's important is the cable and socket but be different with 110v or 235v to avoid "accident".

    i would love to see conputer running from a car battery
  • Re:No... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by stunt_penguin ( 906223 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:27PM (#16207197)
    "how many servers and workstations they could cram into a mobile semi-trailer lab"

    I'm guessing the answer was lots and lots...... there are quite a few technical challenges as you say, power, cooling, and making sure that the machines survive the journey, too.

    It would be a neat side business if Google went into providing server farms and data centers for other businesses; as other people have mentioned they have a lot of smart people working on the associated problems.

    Hey, it could save their asses if this whole internet thing doesn't pan out :)
  • by Jahz ( 831343 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:29PM (#16207221) Homepage Journal
    Actually I would bet that Google servers DON'T have a video card, and that all of them have RJ-45 SOL support (or something like it). The reason being that Google has admitted that they fully embrace the commodity distributed server system. Google will periodically host talks at my university where they explain all this in [too much] detail.

    Basically, when a machine fails, it is pulled from the rack and replaced with an identical machine with a cookie cutter image. Kinda like the Borg :)

    When a box fails it is probably instantly detected by some machine monitor and taken offline (think: the 'crop' tenders in the Matrix I). The sysadmins arent going to waste time plugging a video cable into the rack... just pull it. Toss the box into a repair queue and let the tech's put a video card into it if needed. Remeber: 100's of machines fail for them every day. That's a fact from the Google talk in 05.
  • Bad idea (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ErMaC ( 131019 ) <ermac@@@ermacstudios...org> on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:33PM (#16207273) Homepage
    Google's whitepaper is interesting but the fact is that DC in the Datacenter is already happening, and it's not gaining much momentum for multiple reasons.
    Google's perspective is rather unique, they use super-cheap desktop systems that individually do not use a lot of power and thus running them off 12v DC might make sense. But in any other, more conventional datacenter, servers have multiple power supplies that can EACH pull 800w of power. Now when you're running 110v AC that means you're pulling ~7 amps through a single cable. You need datacenter grade power cables for this, but it's still sane. Now you can get datacenter equipment that runs 48v DC, but those cables end up running ~15 amps through them, so now you need substantially stronger cable - cable so thick that running it becomes a seriously difficult task due to the guage of the wire!
    More likely the direction people are going (and have been for some time) is to 208v AC or 3 phase 220v AC. Now you've just halved the current draw, meaning that your PDUs don't need to be as hefty, your wire doesn't have to be as thick, your coils don't get as hot, etc.
    Running 12v DC in any real data center would be ludicrous - the amount of current you'd have to draw through your cables would be way beyond a safe level.
    Also AC/DC conversions are cheap these days. And remember, DC can kill you just as easily as AC when your DC Voltage is that low.
  • by seanadams.com ( 463190 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:35PM (#16207297) Homepage
    In the old days, disk drive motors and fans. But many of these now run on 5V, hence the cheap USB-powered drive cases out there. Chips at CMOS power levels run at 3.3v, TTL is 5v, but hardly anything runs at 12v anymore. It seems to me that if they'd just pick their hardware carfully, they could run their entire server rack off of 5v+- rails.

    You are correct that hard drives generally use just 5V, but the rest of your points are not even close. Modern CPUs require lower voltages, higher current, and tighter regulation, which is why DC-DC power supplies are now on motherboards instead of running directly from an ATX supply.

    Furthermore, running a rack of servers on 5V rails would be absolutely absurd. Do you have any idea what the amperage would be? The bus bars would have to be several inches thick, the transmission loss would be enormous, and if you accidentally shorted them.... forget it!

    Something like 48VDC might work but then you lose out on all the economies of scale driven by the 110/240VAC standard.

    Just match the power supply to the motherboard and be done with it. Standardizing on one voltage is impractical, and besides, how would it improve "efficiency"?
  • by Animats ( 122034 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:36PM (#16207325) Homepage

    Most of the postings so far have it all wrong. Google is not proposing 12VDC into a desktop PC or 12VDC distribution within the data center. What they're proposing is that the only DC voltage distributed around a computer case should be 12VDC. Any other voltages needed would be converted on the board that needed it.

    This is called "point of load conversion", and involves small switching regulators near each load. Here's a tutorial on point of load power conversion. [elecdesign.com]

    It's been a long time since CPUs ran directly from the +5 supply. There's already point of load conversion on the motherboard near the CPU. Google just wants to make that work off the +12 supply, and get rid of the current +5/-5/+12/-12 output set.

  • by argent ( 18001 ) <peter@slashdot . ... t a r o nga.com> on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:42PM (#16207393) Homepage Journal
    They're not talking about reducing the voltage the PS uses, they're talking about not having the PS produce things like +5 and -5 as well as +12, INSIDE the computer.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:45PM (#16207425)
    My mountaintop observatory is entirely 12 Volt DC-powered. Unfortunately a lot of otherwise-useful devices run off AC adapters with weird and wonderful voltages, such as 7.5 or 9 Volt.

    It'd be great to know that I can hook anything up without having to kludge mods to avoid frying them. At least I didn't go to 24 or 48 Volts... ;-)
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:52PM (#16207533)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • I don't get it. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by pavon ( 30274 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @06:56PM (#16207597)
    I agree that a standardized 12VDC connector on all electronic devices would be nice, like every other poster here has pointed out, but I don't think that is what google is talking about. You can already get power supplies that take 12VDC in, or even dual 48VDC (telecom standard), and I would be surprised if google isn't using something like that already.

    What they are recommending is that the power supply only have 12V out, and all other DC-DC conversions take place on the mother board. Unfortunately, the article didn't go into any detail as to how this would save power, and I don't see how it would make much difference. To me it just seems like you are moving components off the PS and onto the motherboard. Perhaps there is an EE around who could explain it to me.
  • by Bruce Perens ( 3872 ) * <bruce@perens.com> on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @07:03PM (#16207681) Homepage Journal
    Oh. So, we have lots of switching power supplies and tantalum capacitors (because we have to supply lots of current at low-voltage) on the MB. Thus moving work from a cheap part of the computer to an expensive part. Not sure I want more power-supply electronics on the MB than is already there.
  • by Alchemar ( 720449 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @07:29PM (#16208023)
    I use to work on a lot of embeded controls. Ones with lots of different plug in boards to do different things, including all kinds of control signal inputs and outputs of various voltages. The best design I saw was a 50Khz 48VAC power supply. At those frequencies, even a good wattage xfmr is small enough to be soldered to the board. Every where they needed power they installed a xfmr, bridge, and votage regulator. Had to be a little careful about seperating the power from the signals, but all the power connectors were on one side, and the signal bus was on the other. If you use a switch mode power supply, and don't worry about cleaning the pulses to a sine wave it is very efficient.
  • by fm6 ( 162816 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @07:31PM (#16208047) Homepage Journal

    No, he misses the Convergent Technologies NGen. This was a pretty powerful x86 platform that also used external power supplies. The nicest thing about it was that it was quiet: the power supplies (yes, plural; the number you need varied according to your internal hardware) used passive cooling, so only internal heat sources needed to be cooled.

    This was 1983, which was when IBM introduced the PC-AT [wikipedia.org], the machine which defines "compatibility" to this very day. And the AT used a big, noisy internal power supply. Technologically a big step backwards, but one that everybody was forced to imitate, including Convergent.

    So here it is 20 years later, and we're just now beginning to talk about quiet and efficient power supplies again. Kind of sad, really.

  • by kfg ( 145172 ) * on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @07:59PM (#16208377)
    One standard, applied equally across the entire range of products.

    The one used by the majority of DC electric devices, not just computers. The one compatable with existing external power supplies such as solar, home gas powered generators, your car battery, etc.

    If motherboards were designed to run on 12v DC you could put a socket on the back of the case and jack into anything that gave you 12v DC. You could take your home desktop straight to the RV, boat, or cabin in the woods running off a turbine in the little stream or the windmill; without inverters.

    I've been talking about his shit for decades. I've talked about it here. You might almost think that Google:

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=19779 9&cid=16207363 [slashdot.org]

    KFG
  • Re:No... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sillivalley ( 411349 ) <sillivalley@PASC ... t minus language> on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @08:18PM (#16208567)
    The early S-100 systems (Altair, Imsai, Poly, Northstar) used linear supplies and ran unregulated DC on the S-100 bus. Most designers aimed for +8 to +9 volts to feed the onboard +5 volt regulators (and the3 volt or so headroom for 7805 regulators). Can't think of any that ran high current AC on the bus. Some systems, such as the Poly, ran a squared-up 60 HZ signal for real-time clocks.

    The heat losses in S-100 on-card linear regulators were immense! That and the weight of the (linear) transformers helped make the Apple ][, with its switching power supply, so popular (I still have an old Poly power transformer; makes a great doorstop).

    Some mainframe computers used the scheme mentioned by others -- polyphase high-frequency AC distribution. High frequency (think 800 Hz) power transformers are small and efficient; that's why switching supplies run at high frequencies (in the hundreds of KHz range).

    Efficiency is not only about wasting less power, it's about generating less heat!

  • Re:No... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by kasperd ( 592156 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @09:47PM (#16209417) Homepage Journal
    Efficiency is not only about wasting less power, it's about generating less heat!Which is of course exactly the same. In the end all the energy you put into a computer turns into heat. The energy wasted in the power supply turns into heat in the power supply, and all the heating of the power supply is energy wasted rather than used to supply the computer.
  • by jandrese ( 485 ) <kensama@vt.edu> on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @10:24PM (#16209731) Homepage Journal
    I wouldn't count on it. When you're buying in quantities as large as Google is there is no small chance that they designed thier own motherboard and case specifically for their purposes. There's no point getting the floppy controller, USB, and any of the other stuff that you normally get (even on server machines) that's totally useless to Google. They probably paid a lot of attention to the power consumption, not only to install the smallest reliable power supply possible, but also to figure out how many they can cram into a rack and how much power/cooling they'll need.
  • by Skapare ( 16644 ) on Wednesday September 27, 2006 @04:30AM (#16211785) Homepage

    Another way to get more efficiency is to operate the Switched-mode power supply [wikipedia.org] at the higher voltage it supports, usually 220 to 250 volts. In most of the world this is already done. In North America computers are typically run on 120 volts (in Japan this is 100 volts). In general, these power supplies are more efficient by about 3% or so, on the higher voltage. Of course, be sure to flip the voltage switch if it has one, or otherwise verify that it does support the higher voltage.

    For a single computer, it would not be worth adding the extra circuit to get 240 volts. But if you run several, it could be worth doing so, especially if you have so many that it exceeds the capacity of one 120 volt 15 or 20 amp circuit (you could have twice as many on the same amperage if operating at 240 volts). If you already have a circuit dedicated to the computers, that circuit could be converted from 120 volts to 240 volts by changing out the circuit breaker from a one pole to a two pole type, marking the white neutral wire with red or black tape to comply with electrical code identification requirements, attaching these wires to that new breaker (not to the neutral bus), and installing a 240 volt style outlet (NEMA 6-15R or 6-20R). These are the steps that would be used to install an outlet for a big window air conditioner (which you might need anyway with so many computers). Then you can use this [interpower.com] power cord.

UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn

Working...