Ask an Expert About the Future of 'Citizen Journalism' 97
People ranging from Doc Searls to J.D. Lasica to Dan Gillmor to Craig Newmark have talked about how "citizen journalism" is supplanting and/or augmenting professional reporting. (FYI: One of the groundbreaking moments in "citizen journalism" happened right here on Slashdot.) This week's interviewee, NYU professor Jay Rosen, is not only a long-time proponent of civic journalism, but has now started NewAssignment.net with seed money from Craig Newmark, a $10,000 grant from the Sunlight Foundation and, last week, $100,000 from Reuters. Jay Rosen is obviously not just an academic or theoretician, but is actually doing things, which means he can answer almost any question you may have about citizen (or civic) journalism. Usual Slashdot interview rules apply.
Here are some links to articles you may want to read before you post your question(s), if only to avoid duplication:
Web Users Open the Gates
By Jay Rosen
washingtonpost.com
Monday, June 19, 2006
'Blogosphere' spurs government oversight
By Richard Wolf
usatoday.com
September 11, 2006
Open Source Journalism
By Richard Poynder
poynder.blogspot.com
March 28, 2006
Who killed the newspaper?
The Economist
August 24, 2006
AMATEUR HOUR -Journalism without journalists.
by Nicholas Lemann
The New Yorker
July 31, 2006
U.S. Government Should be Focus of Investigative Reports
by Mark Glaser
PBS.org/mediashift
September 7, 2006
anonymous journalism? (Score:4, Interesting)
How to Get More Respect (Score:4, Interesting)
What about mob-rule journalism? (Score:4, Interesting)
What's wrong with other extant examples? (Score:5, Interesting)
Plagiarism and Ethics? (Score:3, Interesting)
It seems to me that the formal mechanism of the separation of the Editor&publisher from the writer is how such standards arose in the firstplace. The writer cannot just publish what they want. And the Editor&Publisher is concerned with establishing the Paper's reputation and can take a long view.
How do I get into the whitehouse press briefings? (Score:1, Interesting)
There will always be a bias away from "citizen" journalists because of this.
Re:Money (Score:1, Interesting)
Is there any reasons why being ambition from reporters -- hungry for recognition or a good career -- leads to poor journalism? I would think this would be a key intention to tap into. While the current institutions don't do this well, it seems to me that the future of the press rests on whether or not ambition can be effectively channeled, not necessarily "flushed out."
I think the "pro" is just as important as the "am" in "pro-am." Amateurs provide a breadth of coverage impossible with professionals, just as professionals provide (in theory) a career committment to quality. However, the secret sauce is that people can move from one to the other:
Professionals have to compete with ambitious amateurs to keep their jobs. This helps keep them honest and on their toes.
At any time, a professional who feels too constrained by their institution can take their skills and go indie. This should help prevent institutions from hoarding talent in the long run.
This speaks to your point about "self-correction," which is sort of an ideal which I doubt any system will live up to at all times. Still, to the extent that citizen journalism is open and transparent (even if some sources are still anonymous and some information not available until after a story is "published"), it should be "self-correctable" if not necessarily self-correcting in every case.
Journalism vs Commentary (Score:2, Interesting)