University of Virginia Student Graduates in One Year 796
An anonymous reader writes "18-year-old David Banh of Annandale, VA recently graduated from the University of Virginia with a double major in Physics and Mathematics, and an education paid for almost entirely by scholarships. What's truly amazing is that he did it in one year, bringing in 72 Advanced Placement credits, then taking 23 credits his fall semester, 37 credits his spring semester and 3 credits in the summer. His brief undergraduate career didn't leave him much time to explore college, so he's now working on his master's degree. He says he may eventually pursue law school as a part-time student in hopes of becoming a patent lawyer."
Congratulations, Mr. Banh... (Score:5, Insightful)
3 Credit Summer? (Score:5, Insightful)
Seems to have missed the point. (Score:5, Insightful)
Somehow, I don't think he got very much exposure to new ideas and concepts. He sounds like someone who's decided that whatever makes the most money is the best thing to do with your life.
Regards,
Ross
What a shame (Score:5, Insightful)
missing crack (Score:4, Insightful)
Sounds a bit odd to me -- where I go to school, many of the course plans are layered, so you have to take a lot of pre-requisites... I don't know if he got them waived via AP credit or what, but even in my last two semesters (I graduate in May, hurrah) I'm still knee-deep in 400 level classes that I have to take before I can take other 400 level classes.
Also, I think he missed the college experience. College doesn't teach you as much book-wise as it does real-life-wise: living on your own, those 3 a.m. conversations about philisophy with your friends, boobies... I'm taking 18 credit hours and working only 24 hours a week and I still have trouble finding time for fun... this kid is either a robot or has no social life (I don't "party" or drink, so I'm already "unsocial" to some people).
Re:Moo (Score:2, Insightful)
What he missed (Score:5, Insightful)
See, to me, college was about learning first and foremost, about obtaining a well-rounded academic education. The key here is "well-rounded." If you're literally spending 13-14 hours a day on class, what else are you doing? Nothing. That's not well-rounded. This kid missed out on everything that makes college, college. Friends, relaxing...hell, dorm floor-wide LAN matches in CS and UT99 (as in my case). Oh, and football. Sweet, sweet football. On the other hand, I can guarantee you that he did nothing but eat, sleep, work, and study.
I'll take a party here and there and some video games, please. I would not do what this kid did, nor would I consider it, or consider letting my children (someday) do it. It's just flat out not worth it.
Re:What a shame (Score:3, Insightful)
Another soul lost (Score:4, Insightful)
This guy has some real potential, he could change the world, he could discover some fantastic advancements for the good of human kind, but no. He wants to be a lawyer.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
135? (Score:5, Insightful)
where's my second degree?
Re:The punchline (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Congratulations, Mr. Banh... (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't get me wrong - classes are important, but making new connections and the experiences you have are as important or, in some cases, even more so. A life where you do nothing but work is no life.
The light that burns twice as bright... (Score:5, Insightful)
What happened before college? (Score:3, Insightful)
No Good Reason to do this (Score:4, Insightful)
First, the physics/mathematics combination is not hard to do. At least where I went to school a physics major only needed a few more classes to get a math degree (because so much was required for physics). Second, I don't think one can truly appreciate physics by doing it all in one year. I doubt he took very many advanced courses. I learned a lot in intro physics (I had AP credit, but declined it to take an honors intro course) that I never learned in high school. And it always takes me a while to truly appreciate a subject. Not just one year. Plus I doubt he got much research experience in.
I'm sure he's a smart person and talented, but there are plenty of people like that out there. If he had tried doing that at a place like Caltech or MIT, I doubt it would've worked. Plus I actually enjoyed taking distribution classes because they gave me an interesting perspective I hadn't known before. In fact, I wish I had taken more of them.
Regardless, if you're thinking of doing this, don't. If you're that smart, go to a better school, spend the money, and be really challenged like this guy never was.
Re:What a shame (Score:2, Insightful)
This seems like an entirely reasonable approach. Get the degree and get on with your life. What is wrong with that? The "college experience" is mostly overrated anyway, so why even bother with it?
You're all wrong. (Score:5, Insightful)
Universities have become a money making shell game...they require you to take a load of irrelevant course work (to broaden your horizons) at over $300/credit then they offer limited sections of these classes which delays your graduation a semester or two. Yeah, the university has your educational interests at heart.
Re:Congratulations, Mr. Banh... (Score:2, Insightful)
College should be about learning, not socializing, binge drinking, wanton promiscuity, or what have you. Somewhere along the way, it became accepted that every single person had to graduate from college to be successful and it became an extension of high school. Then all the immature and ignorant kids left their uptight parents' house, and lacking anything better to do (15 hours of class is a full load?) turned it into Animal House.
That along the idea of bullshit "core courses" being required for me to get a "well rounded" education is precisely why I don't have a college degree. I'm getting along fine without it and refuse to put up with 4 years of High School Part 2 just to get to graduate school. Books don't get any less informative just because they're not being regurgitated onto a chalkboard for you.
Re:Congratulations, Mr. Banh... (Score:5, Insightful)
This guy skipped all that, obsessed with the scholoarly aspect 24/7. He will probably do the same with his job, become quite wealthy, but ultimately very depressed. I wouldn't be surprised to see this guy on a suicide watch by the time he is 25 if he is not careful.
Re:Congratulations, Mr. Banh... (Score:5, Insightful)
In my old age, I know realize that the facts I learned weren't the education. I missed an education. I never had time to make friends or go to a party or watch TV.
The education is being with people as smart as you, as young as you. It's watching Battlestar Galactica together and learning about how other people think about moral questions... it's about making friends with your professors and the TA's. College is where you start making the friends that will connect you with the world as you leave school, giving you access to jobs and communities and a life.
If I had a summary, it would be: goof off in college. Spend an extra year there. Talk to everyone. Take a difficult course twice. Don't be afraid to change concentrations. Go to parties. Get drunk. Meet the opposite sex, even the same sex if that floats your boat. Maybe even at the same time. Live. Learn everything. Cheat authority at every turn, 'cause that disrespect and ability to bypass idiot rules will give you real success at life -- conformity makes you a loser, no matter what toys they give you. There is no other time or place in your whole life that will let you be yourself again, so grab it while you can.
This kid has educated himself into mediocrity.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Stupid (Score:4, Insightful)
I mean, a true genius would be eager to use his cognitive abilities for the advancement of mankind. Start an academic career, change the way we think about the world. Live in fancy old College rooms, sip on a glass of Port, write thoughtful books.
No, he doesn't want to do that. He wants to earn a lot of money. How sad.
Re:Congratulations, Mr. Banh... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What he missed (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think it's fair to say "it's not worth it," because to a lot of people, contributing something meaningful to society is far more important than self-gratification. Just because 95% of the people going to college think it is for their personal benefit does not mean the remaining 5% should share the same view.
And hey, for the most part, I'm in your boat. I waste a lot of time playing video games, watching TV, and hanging out with friends. But I greatly admire those who choose to sacrifice all of that to come up with all of the innovations that allow us to live such a life of leisure. Those people deserve our respect, not our pity.
Re:Moo (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Congratulations, Mr. Banh... (Score:5, Insightful)
"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things."
I always want to add something to the end - "When I became wise, I leanred the value of childish things and turned to them once more"
Re:Missed opportunities. (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh please. This kid just whizzed through college using precious little time and none of his own capital. I guarantee you that he understands more about economics than you do. Now this kid can pursue his own interests with his degree already in hand and the opportunities that come with a degree and a story that clearly manifests a strong work ethic.
While you (and I) are floating through life trying to figure out what it is that we want, this kid is setting goals and achieving them. Even if his master plan isn't 100% perfect he's gotten his degree in a fifth of the time that it takes most people. He could spend the next 3 years backpacking in Peru and still be ahead.
Good for him.
Re:Moo (Score:5, Insightful)
Many professors would like students to explore and experiment in college rather than cram in as much as possible at top speed.
Also, the administrators would like you to take as long as possible to get your degree, to increase the revenue flow.
Re:What a shame (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Moo (Score:5, Insightful)
Or you could simply refuse to "grow up" and have fun your
entire life. The idea that you reach a certain age, or point in time and suddenly
have to start behaving differently is B.S. You can be young as long as you
choose to consider yourself young.
Now excuse me while I go put some Twisted Sister [darklyrics.com] on....
Re:The punchline (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:You're wrong. (Score:2, Insightful)
The point of going to college is poon-tang. Pure and simple. Why do you think they make you take English literature classes? To learn what a boring read Emily Bronte really is? No, it's so you can speak meaningfully to the cutie who wears the green satin bra on Thursdays, and so you can find out exactly what is under that bra, son.
Now go learn something on a "collegiate level", or you will turn into a bitter old man.
Wow, he just missed college (Score:4, Insightful)
Sad honestly. College is a nice 4-5 years of your life of with barely any responsibility and a hell of a lot of fun. What is waiting for you after college. Answer: a career, have fun with that for the next 50 or so years of your life, i dont think putting that on hold for a year is gonna matter much in the end.
Judges, yes ... examiners, yes ... attorneys, NO (Score:1, Insightful)
Power-leveling: a modern trend? (Score:3, Insightful)
Parallel comparison: I'm in Toastmasters (http://www.toastmasters.org/ [toastmasters.org]), an international organization promoting communcation and leadership skills. There's an educational program that takes an average person about five-seven years to compete. Numerically it boils down to about 55 speeches, a major project in leadership and mentoring about 23 people. The first part (10 speeches) takes about one to one and a half years. I felt like I raced through it in 10 months, but later I heard about someone really racing through it in 10 weeks. I met that person and discovered that they had definitely missed the point. He was not a skilled speaker at all and could barely understand all of the meeting roles or the opportunities for service to the organization beyond the club level yet he had achieved the first level of education.
Indirect comparison: World of Warcraft power-levelers (or any game with specific goals). The people who play a single character to level 60 and they're "done." They quit and state "I've seen and done it all." Completely missed the point. The game, like school or professional organizations, is comprised of a great deal more than a simple ladder for reaching the "top." These people miss out on so much content, relationships and experience. I'd compare them to someone who goes to a buffet, tries a single bite of each item and calls that dinner.
Where is this coming from? Has our sense of achievement been condensed to "do the minimum requirement as fast as possible?" I guess it's the opposite end of the spectrum of people, companies and communities that are so laid back that they see no reason to change anything at all ever.
I am envious of Banh that he obviously has a high IQ and the ability to absorb a great deal of information quickly, though I wonder how long he can retain it. Patent lawyer? What a waste of a good brain.
Re:Moo (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Moo (Score:1, Insightful)
after college, life is over (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm really sad to read this. One can experiment and try new things and 'open wings' long after college is over. When you're in college people often say "these are your best years." That always made me sad when I was in college. It wasn't that I didn't have a good time in college--it was absolutely wonderful--but I was only twenty years old! I didn't want my best times to be over when I (hopefully) had at least sixty years left!!
Good thing people were wrong. I'm still growing, spreading my wings, and trying new things. I hope that life only gets better.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:after college, life is over (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Moo (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Moo (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Moo (Score:3, Insightful)
Sure he has the right to choose his own career, but I also have the right to be disappointed in making a choice that was probably motivated by money.
Probably this happened: Father to Son: "You're a genius, son. Now go out and make a lot of money like a good boy."
Re:Moo (Score:4, Insightful)
you to get married, have children, buy a house, etc.
And as somebody else said (again) you can be responsible and still think of yourself as young, and enjoy life and have fun... it's all about finding the right balance that works for you.
And yes, I'm over 30 myself, but I'm still (mostly) the same guy I was when I was 18, 20, 25, 30, whatever. And I still refuse to refer to
myself as an "adult" or a "grown up" but yet I still manage to have enough responsibility to pay bills, hold down a pretty good job, finish a 3rd college degree, etc.
Re:Stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
You're right: Except for Gandhi, no lawyer has done anything to advance mankind in the last 100 years or more. The ones like Voltaire, John Adams, and Gandhi are nothing like the lawyers we have in America now.
Re:Moo (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Moo (Score:5, Insightful)
He's not necessarily a genius because he graduated in one year. He simply found a system that allowed him to do such a thing and decided to take advantage of that system.
When I went to high school, it wasn't even possible to take 72 AP credits. Similarly, most colleges will not allow you to take more than 18-22 credits per semester without permission of the dean; 37 would be completely out of the question.
He blazed through college in a year, probably missing out on a lot of the transformative moments as a college student, not the least of which is the ability to get a feel for what mathematicians and physicists do. It's no surprise to me that he wants to become a lawyer.
He is considering a doctorate in math "if he wants to stay in college". That's the wrong attitude to go into a doctorate (speaking as a first-year CS doctoral student myself), because you will be miserable every second of the program if you go for that reason. It should have nothing to do with whether you want to stay in college and everything to do with whether you have a fascination with a narrow area of knowledge that can only be sated by deep study of that area.
Re:Stupid (Score:2, Insightful)
Not Again (Score:2, Insightful)
First, this guy (in all likelyhood) is not a genius, as many have said. I agree with those who say that he found a system and exploited the hell out of it. This isn't all bad I believe; I did similar things with AP credits and course overloading. Although, I didn't do it NEARLY to this extent because I wanted to get something out of my education. The only shocking thing here is the Univ. of Virg. actually let this happen; anyone looking at this with some idea of technical education/teaching will regard this as an indication of horrific educational standards at Univ. Virg.
I don't care how smart you are there is no way someone will effectively assimilate the level of maturity to be effective in the areas of maths/physics after one year of Uni. study. There is something in education that is really never mentioned, that I refer to as 'subject maturity'. One can still do text book problems and tests in a subject and still have no maturity in it. Maturity is a reflection of original intuition and effective assimilation to the knowledge base already present in a person. To make this more clear, I'll put out a few stages. Stage 1: you can regurgitate what was read and nothing more. Stage 2: you can work problems if they are identical to problems you've seen worked before. Stage 3: you can work new problems that are based off of combining techniques from solving problems you've seen before. Stage 4: you can work simplier problems in the subject which may be completely different than other problems you've seen. There are obviously higher stages; but a bachelors degree rarely gets someone beyond stage 4. This guy is at stage 2; I'd bet money on it. I've seen so many 'hot shot' students who are REALLY good at working the algorithmic process of solving problems they already know; but have no creative ability in the subject whatsoever... grade chasers. Anyway, the article seems to reflect that this guy is simply chasing grades/recognition; I highly doubt he's in it for the deeper understanding. I bet within 6 months 80-90% of what he's learned will be gone. Also, to base so many credits in math/physics off of high school credit is laughable. There isn't even to mention the violation of logical progression in these subjects. You're telling me this kid was doing Quantum Field Theory as he was learning electromagnetism or general realativity before having any idea about pdes? This just doesn't make sense. Again, I am amazed Univ. of Virg. has such lax course requirements. Either that, or he simply was allowed to bypass many of the higher level courses all together. Either way, it doesn't bode well for the Uni. of Virg.'s educational standards.
That all being said, I believe he will have to spend at least another few years as a student. Any decent employers, graduate school is probably going to laugh at a CV outlining one year of study. I know he's been accepted by the Univ. of Virg. into a masters program; but I bet that's because no other decent Univ. would touch him with a 10 foot pole (it is usually discouraged to do a grad degree the same place you do undergrad).
I said 'not again' because I thought that decade or so when people were ooed and awed by the teenage college grads was over, when it was realized how poorly these graduates performed when put to further studies or into jobs. Oh well, I guess some people will always be impressed by the newest 'good will hunting'.