Trusting Users Too Much 100
An anonymous reader writes to alert us to an article at Forever Geek
on sites that trust users too much and the users who game them. From the article: "Trusting users is a good thing. But implicitly trusting users is no good. If Digg has moderators who approve a story before it goes live on the front page, shouldn't they have moderators checking spam reports? Social sites give so much power and emphasis on users yet a handful still have the power to wreck these sites. Until these issues are properly addressed, social sites will continue to be gamed."
Is Slashdot having a down day or something? (Score:5, Funny)
Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #99 (Score:5, Funny)
I remember once Quark had a teacher at Lobeling's (or somewhere) who trusted him to look after a room in his absence (or something). Only this teacher had pictures in his draw. Pictures of said teacher, romping with fully-clothed females! Needless to say, Quark did what any responsible young Ferengi would do in those circumstances: blackmailed his teacher into an A grade.
Re:It happens. (Score:5, Funny)
Unlike Slashdot, which exists so that people can easily tell each other off. Moron.
Shitcock is poetry to my soul (Score:5, Funny)
Vimes. (Score:3, Funny)
Vimes: "I know that one. Who watches the watchmen? Me, Mr. Pessimal."
Pessimal: "Ah, but who watches you, your grace?"
Vimes: "I do that, too. All the time."
From Thud! [wikipedia.org]
Re:Something I think most of us can say: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:It's not gaming and it's not social networking (Score:3, Funny)