Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Apple Announces iTunes 7, Movies, Set-Top Box 710

necro81 writes, "As anticipated, Apple announced several additions and upgrades to its iPod and iTunes lineup. The iPod now comes in an 80 GB model, with a $50 price drop for the 30 GB model. The 2nd generation iPod Nano harkens back to the iPod Mini with metallic, multi-colored shells (though as diminutive as ever) and comes in an 8 GB model. The Shuffle has been completely redesigned and shrunk down to the size of a matchbook. All of this comes with the release of iTunes 7, which includes support for downloading full-length movies from iTMS." All 75 movies initially available are from Disney-related studios. The new iTunes will download cover art for all the songs in your library, no matter where you got them from, as long as you have an iTunes account. (A confirmation dialog says: "Information about songs with missing artwork will be sent to Apple. Apple does not keep any information related to the contents of your music library.") There's a new album-cover browsing view of your library. And Steve Jobs gave a sneak preview of a project code-named iTV: a Mac Mini-like wireless set-top box. Engadget has a blow-by-blow of Steve Jobs's presentation.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Apple Announces iTunes 7, Movies, Set-Top Box

Comments Filter:
  • by Hootenanny ( 966459 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:08PM (#16090685)
    When I downloaded and installed iTunes 7, I was rather stunned to see the new interface. It doesn't even remotely resemble a standard Mac OS X Aqua application. It looks... well, almost like a gray Windows application. Or a Java application. Yuck. Dear Apple, please bring back the old, standard look and feel. Enough said!
  • Re:Big question... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mblase ( 200735 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:11PM (#16090725)
    Why is it that we eagerly participate in a mad rush to publicize every single product at every single Apple PR event? No one else *ever* gets that kind of coverage.

    Two reasons. One: we love new iPods. and Two: Apple nearly wrote the book on this sort of marketing technique, and we still love to fall for it every single time.
  • Baby Steps (Score:2, Insightful)

    by TheWoozle ( 984500 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:13PM (#16090750)
    Well, at $14.99 the movies are too expensive. But the new set-top box is a promising step in the right direction. That plus a Mac Mini look like a nice, quiet, unobtrusive presence in the living room. Notice that the box has HDMI out - possible hi-def videos in the future?
  • by GmAz ( 916505 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:14PM (#16090761) Journal
    I don't know, I kinda dig the new Nano. I liked the colors, espically when a family has kids (or adults) with more than one nano in the house. It helps to seperate them. Also, you could always get the skins for the Nanos, but then the size got bigger. I would liked to have seen some bluetooth or wifi capabilities for transfering the music/video wirelessly, but guess not.
  • by Cr0w T. Trollbot ( 848674 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:16PM (#16090779)
    The War for the Home Media PC Market is Over, and Apple Has Won

    Let's review, shall we?

    • Apple has the best media-enabled PC
    • Apple has the best operating system for playing and manipulating media content...by a wide margin.
    • Apple has the best music playing software (iTunes).
    • Apple has the best MP3 player (iPod) by an overwhelming margin.
    • Apple has the best legal music downloading service (iTunes Music Store) by a similarly overwhelming margin.
    • Now apple has what appears to be the best video-download store (also iTunes). Amazon and company took their best shot to capture the home media market with UnBox...and it's crap [slashdot.org]. Whatever drawbacks iTunes has as a media delivery platform, they pale in comparison to UnBox's unweildy, power-hungry, DRMed piece of crap.
    • Come early 2007, Apple will have what is probably the best set-top box on the market, with an attractive price point. Add a MythTV-like recorder function to that (and I'm sure they're working on it), and you have far and away the market leader right out of the gate.

    In short, in anything in home entertainment that requires a real user interface, Apple has already beaten the competition so soundly that it is hard to see how they will recover. Apart from the XBox 360 line (still a money-loser, though they might finally eek out a profit if Sony doesn't get their act together), Microsoft is completely absent with viable competitors. With $349 for an 80 GB video iPod, does anyone think Zune, due in November, is going to be anything but dead on arrival?

    Game over, Man.

    -Crow T. Trollbot

  • Re:How Much Space (Score:3, Insightful)

    by TrippTDF ( 513419 ) <{moc.liamg} {ta} {dnalih}> on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:22PM (#16090816)
    If only Apple new that I like 10 minute songs, 4096x3072 pics, and 3 hour movies.

    Hear hear! Tech is boiled down so freaking much for most people, it makes me mad. I can remember having this conversation about 20 times in the late 90's:

    Person: How many songs can you put on a recordable CD?

    ME: CD's hold 80 minutes of music, so it depends on the length of a song.

    Person: But how many songs is that?

    Me:
  • by Mattintosh ( 758112 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:22PM (#16090817)
    It looks like Mail.app. That's 10000x better than the all-brushed-metal monstrosity it was before.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:27PM (#16090874)
    I also like the old shuffle better. The big thing being that it can play while charging if you are not using a computer to charge it. I have a habit of leaving it on in my car and coming back to a drained battery. If I had the new shuffle I would have to charge and remove it from the dock to play. Not very practicle.
  • by GeekGirlSarah ( 915748 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:31PM (#16090898)
    God forbid someone want to buy something for a reason other than pure performance, huh?
  • by Golias ( 176380 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:31PM (#16090909)
    If that's the biggest difference in worldview between you and your girlfriend, I think mayby you should just let it slide. She likes cute gadgets. Apple makes cute gadgets. Buy her a cute gadget from Apple and be happy that she doesn't want big shiny rocks (which cost several times as much) for her Christmas present instead.
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:34PM (#16090936)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by coolfrood ( 459411 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:35PM (#16090946) Homepage
    The last time Apple did an iTunes upgrade, they added a minibrowser mode which would basically call home and tell Apple what you were listening to, so that the store would give you recommendations. There was a big hue and cry about the privacy concerns, so Apple changed that to be off by default, instead of on by default.

    With iTunes 7, Apple will now let you get the artwork for your entire music collection, even if it wasn't bought from iTMS. This means that Apple has now given you a reason to willingly tell them about your entire music collection, effectively letting them get the information they want about your musical tastes. Very smart!
  • Re:iTV (Score:3, Insightful)

    by blibbler ( 15793 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:40PM (#16090990)
    iTunes can handle any video Quicktime can. You can even instruct iTunes to convert this video to an H264 that recent iPods can play. As far as I am aware, this has been the case for as long as iPods have been able to play video.
    Ripping DVDs is still illegal in the USA which is Apple's biggest market. If you do the ripping, you can add the DivX (or another quicktime supported format/codec) of a DVD to iTunes.
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:45PM (#16091061)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:How Much Space (Score:5, Insightful)

    by TheGreek ( 2403 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:46PM (#16091069)
    How much can your pocket hold? That's up to you and your iPod. It holds up to 20,000 songs, up to 25,000 photos, and up to 100 hours of video -- or any combination of each.
    If only Apple new that I like 10 minute songs, 4096x3072 pics, and 3 hour movies.
    Yeah.

    They really should also market the raw capacity in GB on the Apple Store page. Maybe before the number of songs. In bold.
  • Re:iTunes 7 (Score:2, Insightful)

    by damiam ( 409504 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @03:56PM (#16091172)
    I doubt Apple is the one making the decisions as to which markets it can sell movies to.
  • Re:Yawn (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dangermouse ( 2242 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @04:01PM (#16091227) Homepage
    A big part of the appeal of the Shuffle is that it had an integrated USB connector - you could use it to replace a USB flash drive and get an MP3 player to boot, without having to carry around a cable. Now you need a cable - a stupid proprietary one at that, not even a standard mini-USB connector.
    I was happy to see the new Shuffle, until you pointed this out. Not because I want or need a USB flash drive, but because it's just less convenient. My girlfriend has one of the white Shuffles, and it's been great for mindlessly grabbing some music to take with us. I've always thought of it as a sort of sample syringe for music: You jab it into the laptop, it sucks up whatever's in there, and then you pull it out and you're good to go.

    A dock isn't so bad if you have a desktop computer, but with a laptop that moves around a lot, it's suddenly a third component to keep track of, where you really only want two.

  • by CharAznable ( 702598 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @04:17PM (#16091397)
    I don't think you are getting it. In albums such as Dark Side of the Moon, The Wall, or Abbey Road, the songs segue into each other without any volume fade. Every time I listen to Pink Floyd on the iPod I feel like driving an icepick through my ears. The gap just ruins the experience for me. Gapless playback in indeed a very welcome addition, and the reason I will upgrade my 3 year old iPod. Normal, distinct songs on normal albums don't suffer through this. And the reason you hear about it in Slashdot is because geeks tend to like less mainstream music where nonstandard song structures are more prevalent.
  • by Golias ( 176380 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @04:23PM (#16091464)
    Ooo... so they fixed for the old-school iPods too!?

    Thanks! That's good to know!

    (Time to go bust up all those "joined" tracks on Dark Side of the Moon tonight. ^_^)
  • Re:DRM (Score:3, Insightful)

    by vought ( 160908 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @05:33PM (#16092118)
    The poster, correctly, reads in Apple's move a bid to get him or her to replace a perfectly fine product with one that has an additional bell or whistle that could in all likelihood be retrofitted, in software, to the 4G iPod. What part of that eludes your grasp?

    What is it about the 4th and 5th generation iPods having vastly different system architecture that eludes your grasp?
  • by Quaoar ( 614366 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @05:39PM (#16092168)
    Same here, I can detect the volume difference. It would be nice if sound check determined a volume for the entire album, instead of on a per-track basis.
  • by protohiro1 ( 590732 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @06:05PM (#16092367) Homepage Journal
    You make a classic mistake when analyzing Apple or Tivo whatever. They aren't selling the features, because EVERYONE has the same features. They are selling the interface or rather complete user experience. This system will certainly be easy easy. Ok, you have itunes installed. Next step, plug in the iTV to the wall. Then plug the wires to your tv, which will be just like hooking up a VCR. Ok...now I'm done! I can use the itunes interface to buy, which I understand, and the movies I want will show up on my TV. Not only is it simple, but it doesn't break the user's metaphor for how these things work. My movies are on my computer, but I can play them on my TV.

    Xbox 360 breaks the metaphor. Ok, so I want to buy a movie. I plug in my xbox 360 (wait...isn't that for games?) then I go to the movie store on the xbox. I browse and press download. Ok...where are my movies living now? On the xbox? Uhhh..ok...but what if I turn off the xbox?

    A savvy user knows the answer to these questions. Of course the xbox is just like your pc, and I'm sure the xbox movie download will work great. But the issue here is that the experience seems a little more confusing, just a little harder to deal with. And that is a major marketing hurdle. Tivo and Apple overcame consumer resistance to tech that savvy people were never afraid to use. The Tivo is so easy to deal with the consumer loses their fear of using a computer to record shows, which sounds too complex. The previous barrier to mp3 player adoption was the complexity in sorting music and getting it on the device. Apple combined ideas and features everyone else already had in a way that wasn't too indimitating for average users. Now, in the consumer's mind an ipod is something they can use. Apple comes around with a thing that is like an ipod for your tv. Easy. The consumer will not be afraid of this because they already have an idea of how this works (of course, they are wrong about that, but that doesn't matter). It will make sense to people, the fear of complexity is easy to overcome here. Microsoft (or sony or amazon or whoever) has a major hill to climb. The first user objection to the Amazon system is "how does it get on my TV?". The objection to the xBox 360 is that people think of it as a game console and using it to download movies is going to sound complex, even if it isn't. Most consumers didn't want Tivo because they hadn't seen it and it sounded too hard. Tivo caught on once enough people had it that people could see how easy it was and lose that fear. So like a sibling poster said, the major innovation here is marketing, followed up by products that deliver as promised. Apple marketing convinces people that they CAN use an ipod. Then the product actually is easy enough to use that it meets this expectation.

    Let's be serious...microsoft does not have a reputation for ease of use.
  • by metroplex ( 883298 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @06:26PM (#16092484) Homepage
    The major complaint about the Nano was that its surface got scratched too easily. Apple fixes this by going back to alluminium while keeping the same size factor, and adds "fancy" colours (ok, I'm not a big fan of those either, but you can get a black or silver one anyway), and people keep complaining? Geez.
  • by small_axe ( 315547 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @06:31PM (#16092516)
    When you try to download album art for a particular song, iTunes throws up a message box saying that they don't collect personal information. If you're the sort who thinks this is a bald-faced lie, then what's to stop Apple from phoning home the entire collection without any interaction on the user's part at all? Why wait for the user to request album art?
  • by Chris Pimlott ( 16212 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @07:18PM (#16092792)
    So they increased the resolution from 320x240 to 640x480, very nice. But what about people who bought videos at the old resolution? Is there any way for them to download the newer version of those videos, or do they have to buy them again to get the higher resolution?
  • by iendedi ( 687301 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @07:31PM (#16092859) Journal
    Frontrow is Apple's weakminded copy of MCE that can't do recording. What you're referring to is iTV. iTV is far from "the most eloquent PPV system ever conceived", it's in fact a direct copy of Microsoft Media Center extender.
    Aside from a few MC*Es and Microsoft employees, I am aware of nobody who has ever (or would ever) connect their PC to their television. The problem with Microsoft zealots is far worse than Apple fanboys. The Apple fanboys go nuts over Apple products, without doubt, and annoyingly so at times. But they know something that "works" when they see it. Microsoft zealots delude themselves into believing that something that doesn't work, doesn't have legs and is heading nowhere slowly actually has a chance of survival. It is a mysterious phenomena.

    Front-Row is a product designed to be turned on and used with a remote with 5 buttons and no skills. The iTV (!!) box is designed and marketed to be plugged in to a television and used with no skills. It is also sold specifically to be attached to a TV to watch movies, it is not bundled into a general purpose PC guerilla marketing style by PHBs that mistakenly believe that once the user realizes he has a media center on his desktop that he will move his PC to the living room and attach it to his television.

    In comparison, MCE is something that is really only owned accidentally by people who don't even know they have it (because it was bundled with their PC from Best Buy), it requires the PC to be near the TV rather than on a desk and requires the user to know how to configure it and operate it with some crazy 300 button remote control (exaggeration, but the point is clearly made). It would probably require a class to get a user comfortable with the relationship between and configurations of MCE and Microsoft Media Player (and the derivitaves such as Amazon Unbox). It really doesn't matter if MCE can do any of the things that Front-Row does (which it really doesn't because Microsoft doesn't use zero-conf [bonjour] and whatnot). The simple fact is, it is not designed or marketed in a manner that will ever be used that way by the common man.

    To say that something *can* be done is not the same as saying that people *will* do it. You *can* write an assembly language CGI script library for publishing a Blog site. But I doubt you *will*...
  • by 7Prime ( 871679 ) on Tuesday September 12, 2006 @08:43PM (#16093192) Homepage Journal

    Sound Check is just a normalizer, right? It goes through, finds the peak volume, and then amplifies everything up to the point that it's 0, right? Well, Mastering houses, as well as recording studios, normalize everying, anyway! So unless you're consantly listening to stuff put out by VG Remix kiddies or local garage bands who don't know what their doing, Sound Check is pretty worthless anyway. Sure, on a concept album, there might not be a peak in a particular track, do to the whole album being normalized together, but the difference is going to be about 1db-2db tops.

    My Advise: turn Sound Check off, it's pretty useless for MOST music listening applications.

  • Re:DRM (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jaydonnell ( 648194 ) * on Wednesday September 13, 2006 @12:07AM (#16094078) Homepage
    he didn't buy it no matter how you try to spin it. Even if he did i'll bet the license says they can do what they did, but that isn't the point. He bought an mp3 player that can still play mp3's just as it could when he bought it.

    But you are still missing the main point. My original point, and the only one I have towards the OP is that his complaint about the new features on the IPOD make no sense. itunes has nothing to do with the point I was making to the OP.
  • by eliot1785 ( 987810 ) on Wednesday September 13, 2006 @02:13AM (#16094492)
    I can't burn this to a DVD to play in a DVD player? Sorry, then it's pretty much pointless to me. Also, the movies aren't even full DVD resolution. Why exactly does Apple think it can get away with charging up to $15 for this crap? I will still buy real DVD's as long as that's the policy, thank you very much.

    Also, one of the supposed improvements to the new iPods is that the screen is now 60% brighter. Is it just me or was the iPod screen already extremely bright, almost too bright? 60% brighter and I'm not sure I'll even be able to look at it. Fortunately they have the brightness control.

    I agree with engadget - I'm pretty underwhelmed by this. I was hoping they'd have a bigger screen. Is the increase from 60gb to 80gb really going to sell anybody on this? Something makes me think not.

    The decrease in price is pretty cool, but isn't that a tacit admission on their part that the improvements on their own aren't worth buying the 5.5G? If the improvements were good they wouldn't have to lower the price.

    The Nano's, however, are nice. As is the shuffle. The shuffle is pretty badass given how small it is, like a lapel pin. And I like the return to multicolor that they lost when they discontinued the Mini.

    Still, there is no reason at all for me to upgrade my iPod from my 60gb 5G, even if I did have the money. And I think this may leave them vulnerable to Microsoft, whose player will have a bigger screen.

    Overall, my reaction is "meh"...

You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken

Working...