HP's Dunn as Newsweek Cover Girl 198
theodp writes "In The Boss Who Spied on Her Board, Newsweek likens HP Chairwoman Pattie Dunn's attempts to escape culpability with her I-knew-nothing defense to both a head of state, who wants 'plausible deniability' while ordering an assassination plot, and to Henry II, who had the Archbishop of Canterbury removed by simply muttering 'Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?' in front of his knights."
But interested enough to post? (Score:5, Insightful)
At one stage, HP was "the best". They made the best calculators, best test equipment, best everything they touched. Their slide probably started with getting into the commodity PC industry (PCs and printers).
Re:limelight dims (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:limelight dims (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:limelight dims (Score:5, Insightful)
What this person did is just totally inexcusable and they came out looking like a total dimwit on top of it. Who cares about their sex? What this person did was WRONG and they deserved to be given a hard time. If a man (and again, why does it matter) did the same thing I can guarantee that people aren't going to hesitate to criticize him. So maybe the question you should ask is given two people of different sexes (hypothetically) who commit the exact same crime under the same circumstances, why should we treat them differently?
Re:But interested enough to post? (Score:2, Insightful)
Archbishop of Canterbury also known as... (Score:2, Insightful)
What else would they do? (Score:4, Insightful)
Private Investigators should go to jail (Score:3, Insightful)
Private investigators ARE licensed. They ARE supposed to act WITHIN the law. If any company chooses to hire licensed private investigators, then it's understandable that you assume this, i.e. don't necessarily need to ask questions about their precise methods.
Who were these so-called private investigators? Is this is the first time these private investigators have broken the law in order to get a paycheck? Who were their other clients prior to their HP contract? If the P.I.'s were ordered to do something illegal, why didn't they object?
Why aren't the journalists focusing on them?
Re:Turbulent (Score:3, Insightful)
Funny, i've always heard it as "will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest," although admitedly neither i nor i expect any other american actually learned about it in school as a child, so it is most certainly _not_ "school-kid knowledge of history" for everyone. Secondly, if you want people to listen to you you might want to adopt a slightly less agressive tone. "If you're going to quote someone at least get it right" is much more likely to be taken as elitism than a phrase like "i was told the original quote was" or something along those lines.
And lastly, before you chastise someone else for getting the quote wrong, make sure you yourself have got it right. Wikipedia certainly isn't infallible, but their page on Thomas Becket [wikipedia.org] says it was "passionate words from the angry king" and then lists several phrases that were reputedly used, so no one is really sure what the exact utterance was to begin with. Not to mention the fact that this was during the period when middle english was being spolen and what he said probably only had a passing relationship with a modern english interpretation of the same words. I therefore strongly suspect that _all_ of us are wrong, or all of us are right, depending on how you choose to look at it. It seems rather unlikely however that you can conclusively proove you are more correct than the person you corrected.
No, she was not "ethical". (Score:5, Insightful)
The 2nd part of that makes no sense. And no, she was NOT ethical in this.
And?
Just because one person is not ethical does not make it ethical to take un-ethical actions to find that person.
Nooooooo..... it seems that she STARTED investigating reporters. And people related to reporters.
Drop the word "officially". Dunn authorized it. Dunn instigated it. It is Dunn's responsibility.
And so
If some other people don't object, that does not make it ethical.
No, it would not be. This type of behaviour is un-ethical no matter who the target is.
No, it has not.
I'm hoping that, because of this, the "pretexting" practice becomes a Federal Crime.
"couldn't be bothered"?
She hired a company to actively search for information.
And when she received their report, she did NOT ask how they came up with information that would not be available outside of a court order.
That is un-ethical.
She is un-ethical.
Re:Turbulent (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Wow. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Turbulent (Score:4, Insightful)
Nobody ever said Let them eat cake [yahoo.com] either, but correcting somebody when they utter those words to illustrate a point is about as pedantic as you can be. If the meaning of the phrase is retained, and the message is succinctly conveyed, what the hell is so important about the words unless you're quoting them with the actual intention of accurate archival?
Re:But interested enough to post? (Score:5, Insightful)
The real sadness in all this is that HP started off as an icon of geekdom, "The American Way", and many other pure and virtuous themes.
When was this exactly? This sounds like an idealized romanticized view of someone who doesn't actually know what they're talking about. Sure HP has made great products, but "icon of geekdom"... that sounds like either misplaced affection or overzealous fanboism to me.
Since then it has been Carley'ed and generally fucked over in many ways.
Again... since when? "Carley'ed". What's that mean? Carley's gone last I checked. HP's innovating, HP's selling products that work and that people and businesses want... "fucked up?" again you're overexagerating b/c you have some ridiculously romantic view of how things once were... and no idea of what is today.
At one stage, HP was "the best". They made the best calculators, best test equipment, best everything they touched. Their slide probably started with getting into the commodity PC industry (PCs and printers).
Really? TI seemed to have some kick-ass calculators... I don't know who hands out awards for "the best" calculators but I seem to remember TI was the standard for calculus+ classes at the University I attended. Best test equipment... maybe, but I thought HP was a computer company... so geeks are freaking out about test equipment. "Best everything they touched"... again with your hyperbole. You're exagerating... and I'm guessing it's because you don't know what you're talking about. "Commodity PCs and Printers"... HP invented the fucking laser jet printer. The laser jet, the desk jet... those fuckers sell like hotcakes. HP owns the market and they keep innovating. Waht are you smoking?
I think this entire line of thinking is unsubstantiated... it's that sort of reality that exists in
Re:But interested enough to post? (Score:4, Insightful)
What on earth is it you think that HP is currently innovating?
They don't do medical equipment anymore (that part now belongs to Philips). They don't do Test & Measurement or components either (see Agilent).
HP used to make some extremely good printers, which were head-and-shoulders above others in the field (I'm talking about the LJ 4/5 era), but that's not true for their current printers. HP is certainly not the clear market leader it used to be. The technology they invented was excellent, and the printers today still benefit from that, but it seems to me that instead of real innovation now, they are more interested in finding ways of stopping people using ink from other manufacturers, so they can sell their own at horrendous prices. Why does HP's ink cost more than Dom Perignon champagne [bbc.co.uk]?
The same goes for PA-RISC, which was a strong architecture at the time. I see no advantage to buying an Itanium system now though. I wouldn't say that HP were the best at everything, but they definately had a significant edge; they don't have that anymore.
HP took the innovation out of the company and put it in their logo. I was there - I saw it with my own eyes. They don't do anywhere near as much innovation as they used to. It's a shame.
You've missed what it is that is upsetting people. They used to make most excellent products; now they're only good. That's a big step backwards.
Back to the current story: anyone who worked at HP in the 80s and early 90s will know what an amazing corporate culture it had. This current scandal is yet another sign that HP has become the thing that Bill and Dave wanted to get away from. The old HP is dead, and what you see here is people in mourning.
-- Steve