Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Robocabs Coming to Europe 176

Roland Piquepaille writes "Almost all of us can recall both good and poor memories of taxi rides when we arrived in a city we didn't know. This is why a short article from Spiegel Online, 'Bringing Robot Transportation to Europe,' caught my eye this morning. It briefly describes the European 'CityMobil' project which involves 28 partners in 10 countries at a cost of €40 million. This project plans to eliminate city drivers and three trial sites have already been selected. For example, in 2008, Terminal 5 in London's Heathrow airport will be connected to the car park by driverless electric cars along a 4-kilometer track. Read more for additional pictures and references about this project to make the roads in Europe's cities more efficient."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Robocabs Coming to Europe

Comments Filter:
  • Along a track? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 08, 2006 @10:40PM (#16070296)
    You mean, like trains and subways?
  • Already done (Score:4, Insightful)

    by dayid ( 802168 ) * <slashdot@dayid.org> on Friday September 08, 2006 @10:48PM (#16070323) Homepage
    So you mean by 2008 we'll have reverted back to trollies and cable-cars? Perhaps people will even ride in electric vehicles that carry 30 or more people! Then everyone can get there for a tenth of the price! Oh wait, no that's a bus...

    1) Take age old idea.
    2) Do the same thing only with added benefit of key words.
    3) Sell it as a new idea
    4) Get fools to buy it.
    5) PROFIT!!

    Yeah, that's right, no "?????" step here.
  • by A nonymous Coward ( 7548 ) * on Friday September 08, 2006 @11:46PM (#16070470)
    Think what life would be like if no one needed to actually own their own car, if all car needs were met by robotaxis. I mean with enough of them around that you could pick one up within a minute at most. You would call for one on your cell phone -- it would use your cell phone location to know where to pick you up -- you'd say or type in the address -- when you get there, it charges your cell phone or robotaxi account or whatever -- it goes away to serve somebody else.

    You could get by with one tenth the number of cars on the road today.

    You could eliminate most parking at offices and factories and in residential areas.

    You could reduce te number of cars sold every year by a factor of ten.

    They could mostly be electric, thus quieter and centralizing the smog makers at power plants.

    You could always get a vehicle more suited to your immediate needs. No need to buy a uge general purpose SUV or minivan or pickup just for the occasional furniture move or picking up loads of potting soil.

    I am all in favor of tese robotaxis.
  • by YrWrstNtmr ( 564987 ) on Saturday September 09, 2006 @12:43AM (#16070580)
    You could get by with one tenth the number of cars on the road today.

    You'd have exactly the same number of cars on the road as you have now.
    Unless you increase the number of passengers per vehicle, or decrease the number of powered trips (bicycles/feet), it would be the same number of trips here and there. There might be fewer vehicles in total circulation, but the number in motion at any one time would be the same. There would, of course, be fewer sitting around in driveways and parking lots.

    You could reduce te number of cars sold every year by a factor of ten.

    Wear and tear. If you and 9 other people in your neighborhood all used one car, how long would it last at 200,000 miles per year?
    Who mediates when all 10 of you need to get to work at the same time, in different places?

    They could mostly be electric, thus quieter and centralizing the smog makers at power plants.

    This has zero to do with power source. Electric could happen with or without robocars.
  • by cdn-programmer ( 468978 ) <(ten.cigolarret) (ta) (rret)> on Saturday September 09, 2006 @04:04AM (#16070842)

    So are they gonna pipe in mid-eastern music, garlic smells, and strange bead thingies dangling from the mirrors to give it the real cabbie ambiance?


    Probably not. If you listen to "Time" by ELO, they'll probably make the driver a red head, blonde or brunette depending on your taste and probably track your preference. She'll have a sweet voice and will not be inclined to argue. Next she will be just the right blend of demanding but nice. You can paraphrase this to mean "Stimulating".

    Alas, as the say in the song - She might be perfect "But she isn't IBM".

    Since I use an IBM PC 101 KB I know the tactile feel of something from IBM. There is nothing more pleasant on the planet. Now if IBM would slip the VM technology of the MainFrames into my little 'puter so I have full virtualization and can run several Linux and OpenBSD operating systems along with the winders (ugg) stuff - then I would fall in love.

    I had to put up with a very nicely engineered and very expensive NEC special order KB for a number of years until I managed to lay my pinkies on the IBM KB. I use to love the song by ELO and now I know why.

    IMHO the technology of yester-year will not be able to match the joys that await us. Hense I always tell anyone not too familiar with a computer or new thechnology that "Great Joy's await you!"
  • by legoburner ( 702695 ) on Saturday September 09, 2006 @05:51AM (#16070990) Homepage Journal
    I agree with you, and have been hoping that some day they start doing this in denser areas. Being able to use advanced routing methods to move people from A to B in place of the inefficient and unaware cars and buses of today would be very useful. There are a few problems I can think of that need to be sorted out to get this to work properly though:
    - Efficient routing around disasters, with breakdown detection to prevent a single system failure from breaking the entire network.
    - Some sort of weight detection system to ensure that people do not leave anything on the vehicles (bags, bombs, etc). Normally a driver would point these things out but automated systems lack that ability.
    - Some sort of 'digital nose' type device to detect the vehicles which have stink bombs, vomit, and whatever other lovely smells that can be accrued by frequent usage in a densely populated area, and allow the vehicles to be removed from service and cleaned instantly.
    - Decent integration with pedestrians. They need to be able to go as fast as possible so that fewer vehicles are needed, but must not clog up roads for traffic and pedestrians. Ideally some sort of sunken road could be used where appropriate perhaps, allowing large boulevards at ground level, and enabling their usage in pedestrianised areas.
    - Easy to use for disabled people.
    - Free or cheaper than driving a car or taking a bus.
    - Must run at all hours, not be limited like public transport is, as this encourages people to either stumble around cities drunk after clubs close, or sometimes risk driving home.

    That is all that I can think of right now, anyone got any others? A private public-transport would be very welcome.

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...