Xbox for Stroke Rehabilitation 147
An anonymous reader writes "Using an Xbox modified to run Linux, researchers have developed virtual reality hand exercises for rehabilitating stroke patients. An inexpensive glove controller is used to interact with the Xbox. The hardware cost is a tenth of a comparable commercial hand rehabilitation system, leading to the possibility of deployment in patients' homes."
Why an Xbox? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Why an Xbox? (Score:2, Interesting)
Maybe....
1. It is readily available and quite cheap
2. They are all the same specs, so what you develop for 1 xbox would have "almost" the same performance as with all xbox
3. It could be readily plugged into the television set and be unplugged as easily.
4. More glove sales
Simple Solution (Score:3, Interesting)
1. A small team of software developers will sit down with you and write some rehab software for the XBox 360.
2. Microsoft will donate the software and equivalent number of 360's to hospitals and clinics.
3. We have a big press conference and you tell how Microsoft is helping stroke victims.
-OR-
We take you to court and do the same thing without you.
Inhibiting research (Score:5, Interesting)
The irony of "free markets" is that the less regulation the worse they perform. Monopolies are crackable DRM.
Comment removed (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:is there any relation? (Score:3, Interesting)
Additionally, the patient wouldn't be looking at their screen for long periods of time. Therapy sessions are generally limited to short periods of time... there's no use in long periods of therapy. My wife, who is an occupational therapist, suggested that someone with many hours a day of possible rehab time might only spend an hour or two doing actual rehab, and that time should be broken up into 15-20 minute segments.
Finally, there is something special about this. An Xbox is much more standardized than most computers. The interface for the hardware will be exactly the same on every Xbox, making it easy for therapists and patients to use. Plus it doesn't have to be updated with security patches, virus scanners, etc, so it's more stable than a common desktop computer. It's also cheaper than most computers, coming in around $100-$125 these days.
Some of the equipment my wife uses costs tens of thousands of dollars and wouldn't be as effective as this. I showed her this article and she's excited enough to show all of her therapist friends at the hospital.
Re:Inhibiting research (Score:1, Interesting)
Such as;
- extremely high food quality regulation = monopoly for the only company that have the technology/systems to satisfy them and prove it
- awarding a contract for building a road having as a requirement that the company has a comprehensive social awareness policy and dedicated immigrant integration trained HR officers = monopoly/oligopoly for the few/single larger companies with the resources to invest in this at the side of building roads
- state running of utility (electricity, gas) regulation = monopoly for the state
- prohibition of private schools or private hospitals regulation = monopoly for the state
- extremely high clinical testing regulation = oligopoly for companies that can meet those, e.g. making drug creation literally impossible for any starting company.
Am I mistaken in thinking you only have a problem with monopolies if they are in private hands?
I disagree that 'the less regulation the worse they perform', since that would imply that with regulation up the wazoo they would perform spectacularly - and if you truly believe that, I would call you delusional. I can agree that a point in between _full regulation_ and _no regulation_ is optimal, but that takes a bit more discussion than a one-directional knob.
Re:Interesting... (Score:3, Interesting)
But wait (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:But wait (Score:3, Interesting)
The real shame here is that MS doesn't EVER license their devkits to anyone unless they are a serious game developer and can front a huge amount of cash. For that matter, Sony and Nintendo don't, either.
I'm sure they are afraid some 'pirate' is going to use the official devkit to figure out how to fake the encryption and all that. But they usually figure all that mess out anyhow, or find an even better way to circumvent the protection, so there really isn't much point.
Re:Inhibiting research (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Interesting... (Score:3, Interesting)