Douglas Engelbart's HyperScope 1.0 Launched 82
ReadWriteWeb writes, "HyperScope 1.0 is a new Web app based on Douglas Engelbart's 1968 NLS/Augment (oNLine System). Engelbart and team have been working on Hyperscope since March of this year in a project funded by the National Science Foundation. Its aim is to rebuild portions of Engelbart's NLS, on the Web, using current Web technologies such as Ajax and DHTML. In effect it gives an advanced browsing experience, including classic hypertext features like indirect links and transclusions of remote pieces of other documents. HyperScope has been completely built with open source JavaScript toolkit Dojo — meaning that everything is done on the client-side."
Actual link (Score:5, Informative)
Blog blog blog blog blog, blog blogpost blog blog...
Re:So let me get this straight.... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:So let me get this straight.... (Score:4, Informative)
I guess if the team's goal was to create something which is even more of a navigation nightmare than Flash, well, then, They're Winner!
Re:Wiki? (Score:3, Informative)
[1] http://www.eekim.com/blog/ [eekim.com]
[2] http://wikisym.org/ws2006/ [wikisym.org]
[3] http://www.blueoxen.com/tools/purplewiki/ [blueoxen.com]
Re:Now I'll never get to sleep (Score:2, Informative)
That hardware (=crucial, number-crunching part of the Mill) was finally implemented waaaay back in 2000 or thereabouts, and is now on display AND running (crank-powered) in The Science Museum in London, UK. Scientific American had a feature on it around then,too. Sorry, no urls.
Along the way, the two "implementers" discovered several "mechanical" errors in Babbage's original drawings, which would have prevented the Engine from fuctioning even had it been built; so they corrected them, and the concept proved viable after all.
It appears to be a web based outliner (Score:4, Informative)
If so it's not a bad idea. If my impression is correct, then think for a moment about this idea:
hyperscope : wiki
There is no document you can produce in an outliner that cannot be produced in a word processor, whereas there are practically infinite documents you can create in a word processor. Which is what makes an outliner useful. Classification is such a basic and useful mental pattern, putting an amorphous blob of thoughs into the form of an electronic outline goes a lot of the way to organizing it into something coherent.
My experience with wikis is that if you have one really mentally disorganized person with time on his hands, he can quickly turn important parts of the wiki into mush.