Commodore 64 Confuses Austrian Police 470
toomanyairmiles writes, "It seems that Wolfgang Priklopil, the communications technician who kidnapped Austrian pre-teen Natascha Kampusch, relied on a Commodore 64 as his primary machine. Interestingly this is presenting some problems to the Austrian computer forensics people. Major General Gerhard Lang of the Federal Criminal Investigations Bureau told reporters it would 'complicate investigators' efforts' and would be difficult to transfer the files to modern computers 'without loss.' Could this be the latest in the criminal world's security strategy? Can we expect to see Spectrums, Archimedes, and Atari STs turning up in police investigations soon?"
Why go that far? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Question (Score:1, Insightful)
Is a notebook and pencil obsolete purely because it doesn't incorpoate AJAX and Flash?
Having worked for some time for an IT services company for home users I can assure you that people really do use, nay depend, on obsolete equipment.
Re:Why go that far? (Score:5, Insightful)
Quickly becoming a meme:
Only a terrorist wouldn't use Windows.
Re:Question (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Question (Score:3, Insightful)
I find it more amusing.. (Score:0, Insightful)
Too bad no one took a shit on him for an extra "laugh"
missing the point (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Followup (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Question (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Followup (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why go that far? (Score:4, Insightful)
You are far from correct. A lot of forensic investigators I have talked to actually use linux at times to do things such as image drives which is safer to do on linux than Windows and they are not straight Windows users.
Yep, all their tools are Windows-specific.
The reason they do use Windows tools most of the time is because the tried and true forensic applications are developed for Windows such as Forensic Toolkit Pro http://www.accessdata.com/products/ftk/ [accessdata.com] and EnCase http://www.guidancesoftware.com/products/ef_index
Windows may not be the greatest OS, and I know people love to bash it, but that does not mean the Windows tools developed for forensic investigations are of low quality. I work as a software developer in this field so I have a decent view on what the situation is and your comment was way far off.
Re:Question (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm not sure what the outcome was, but I know they still have the C64 up and running in their office.
It does present some interesting complications, from what (little) I know about the forensic examinations they do, they go to great pains not to alter the contents of the original media, using apps like EnCase [guidancesoftware.com] to snapshot drives they're working with.
homer_ca How reliable are those 20 year old floppy disks?
I'm not sure, but I have an unopened (still shrinkwrapped) box of 10 5 1/4's in my office that I've been considering tossing on eBay just for fun. Buy 'em and find out!
Re:Question (Score:2, Insightful)
So basically I wasted a lot of money and time, and if I could go back I'd keep the A1200 (and just run Linux on that if I really wanted to at some point).
Re:Question (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Question (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why go that far? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Tag: Lamers (Score:2, Insightful)
How would you suggest they go about doing that 'block image copy'? Should they use the 1541 drive? Do they understand enough about the drive to make it do the copy?
I don't believe a standard PC drive will read Commodore disks. The Commodore used "GCR" encoding, where PC drives have always used "FM/MFM". These encodings are incompatible with each other.
Also, I know that some Commodore drives would adjust the spindle speed to get more bits packed into outer tracks - I don't know if the 1541 drive did this, though.
I assume there must be a machine that'll do a true bit-by-bit copy of a disk (and, presumably one that would copy to a medium compatible with a PC).
Disclaimer: I haven't looked at PC disk controllers in years - maybe recent controllers have changed in a way that they can understand "GCR" (but I don't see why the design would have changed to support this, as it's not needed on a PC).
- Paulb
Re:Followup (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Commodore 64 has an RS-232 interface. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Followup (Score:3, Insightful)
From the point of view of big media, this is not a problem. For them it suits them just fine. Unfortunately for the buying public this is a major issue.
Re:Followup (Score:4, Insightful)
I know the common thing to do is berate corporations for having no long-term vision - but the RIAA/MPAA/??AA do. They've perfected the technique of hovering around that fine line between "too fast, and people will notice" and "too slow, and we'll be obsoleted before we achieve our objectives".
Re:Followup (Score:3, Insightful)
You do what everyone has done since the days of Edison's wax cylinders. You buy into whatever format is convenient and practical for the moment and let the archivists worry about preservation of the analog and digital masters.
Re:This is retarded (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why go that far? (Score:4, Insightful)
Not if you use an IDE cable with the write pins removed.
Re:Question (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Commodore 64 has an RS-232 interface. (Score:3, Insightful)
except ... (Score:4, Insightful)
Except that those same media companies may in the future with high probability consider providing say Britney Spears' "tracks" (sorry, if I spelled her name wrong) for re-purchase as a "not interesting from operating profit point of view" thus consumers will be unable to repurchase thus they lose their beloved tracks. Or become criminals.
Feel free to replace "Britney Spears" with any other name from current "popular music" (or even past "popular music").
Oh so very relevant... (Score:4, Insightful)
Marc Dutroux (the Belgian Paedophile) had several accomplices - one of whom was directly responsible for Julie and Melissa's death by not feeding them whilst Dutroux was in prison on another charge.
Re:Clues? How about relevance? (Score:4, Insightful)
Its one of those "without a trace" scenarios. Maybe the dead kidnapper has girls buried in basements all over Austria. You have to crack the C64 file system before they starve to death.
Re:Commodore 64 has an RS-232 interface. (Score:4, Insightful)
Personally I suspect the investigators just have a bunch of MCSE's who run prepackaged forensic tools and have never seen a C64 and don't know how one works.
Re:Question (Score:2, Insightful)
Money, for two.
Yes, you can get the operating system to run on all this lovely modern hardware for free, but you don't get the hardware for free, do you? Well, obviously not you personally, possibly (being a geek an' all), but for the average guy. Not saying that this kidnapper guy is average, obviously...but if you had a computer that did everything you wanted, you didn't care about the fancy pictures and graphics, 40 columns of text in two colors is fine for some people.
So, all you spend money on are cassettes and disks - can you even BUY 5+1/4 inch floppys anymore?
For twenty years.
Rather than spending between oh, say from 500 up to 2 grand (on average) what, three, four years?
I could guess that if you're such a tightass that you have to steal a girlfriend, brainwash her into loving you rather than do it proper and spend money on diamond rings and things, it's probably not such a far step to never upgrading your computer. what say that he was obsessive over it? He might have kept it immalucate, and there you go, folks! A computer that lasted for twenty years!
What else...As far as why this particular guy stuck with his old crumble-door, well, given the state of his mind to do what he did in the first place, there could be aaaaaaaalll sorts of reasons why..SOme of them you may well REALLY not want to know about.
And finally, if they really want the data that bad, they have the resources (and the technology) to rubuild it. If they really want the data, they could even break out the electron microscopes (I reckon the grains in a floppy disk woudl make this a non-trivial task - the disks were only 170KB, you know...
Fear for retrocomputing (Score:4, Insightful)
No, what this means is that soon, anyone who owns or purchases an old piece of computing will either have to submit to a background check or be put on a DHS watchlist. Because there is no reason for a normal person to own an old piece of technology other than for nefarious purposes.