$600 PS3 Ships Without HDMI Cable 416
Eurogamer reports that the $600 PS3, which comes available with an HDMI port, will not ship with the necessary cable to actually hook the machine up. From the article: "According to the specs page on the official US PS3 website, which notes: 'HDMI cable not included. Additional equipment may be required to use the HDMI connector.' Sony has long promoted the 60GB PS3's HDMI output as a key feature of the machine. The 20GB model, however, doesn't feature HDMI - and nor does the Xbox 360, as it goes, despite occasional rumours of a hardware revision in the offing." The machine will, of course, come with a composite cable.
This is not news. (Score:5, Informative)
If you've got $600 to drop on a PS3, you've got another $20 for cables. Move along, nothing to see here.
HDMI for HDCP (Score:3, Informative)
Re:This is not news. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:'Cuz a cable costs $100... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Proprietary connector? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:This is not news. (Score:5, Informative)
This is a review from Top Gear: it's a great clip, however for the point I'm trying to make is about one third of the way in - check out . Things you would consider essentials on a sports car - the sports chrono package (500 pounds), 19" wheels (1260 pounds), fade free carbon ceramic breaks (5350 pounds!), an adaptive dampers (1030 pounds), the SatNav is an extra 1800 pounds - even the rear windshield wiper is an extra 260 pounds. This, all on a car that's already over 50,000 pounds. Tell me again why people are getting bent out of shape here - it's a cheap $20 cable that 5% of PS3 owners are going to want/need - you can't even begin to compare that to a $400 rear windshield wiper that every single person who owned the car (especially in the UK) is going to want AND need.
Oblig. Xbox 360 Note (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Oh noes! (Score:3, Informative)
Yes it does, My Sony Fanboi. And its also $100 cheaper. Any more questions?
Re:Pinch Those Pennies! Ouch! (Score:5, Informative)
It should also be noted that the traditional "digital" signals people like to argue over, for example SPDIF, also include no error correction whatsoever.
That is not to say that there is any merit in oxygen-free copper for HDMI cables, but rather that the world is a lot more complex than knee-jerkers on both sides of this particular argument realize.
Re:Pinch Those Pennies! Ouch! (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Bastards! (Score:1, Informative)
99% of the time items that produce video signals come with the cables, items that receive said signals do not. This is just the way the market seems to have worked things out.
My $400 Xbox 360 came with a nice set of component cables. Have fun with your $15 cable. I'm sure the quality is just stellar.
Re:Bastards! (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Bastards! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Blu-Ray curse (Score:1, Informative)
Just because developers are using the extra space doesn't mean that they had to use the extra space or that it was a good idea to use the space.
If you're using MPEG 2 encoding on 1080p cutscenes you will rapidly run out of space on a standard DVD, if you cut the resolution down to 1080i or 720p and/or encode using a better compression algorithm (DivX for example) you will produce a cut scene at a level of detail which few of your users will notice a difference at a fraction of the storage requirements (probably 10%). Thus they didn't need Blu-Ray.
Also, if you noticed in the Previous Generation the Gamecube had far shorter loading times then either the PS2 or XBox on average; there are two main reasons for this: loading times were shorter in part because the Gamecube development kit emulated the ammount of time required to read from disc ensuring it would be noticed by game developers, but the main reason was that (with the smaller disc size) most textures had to be compressed to fit onto a Gamecube disc (thus drastically reducing the quantity of data that had to be loaded). In contrast many (if not most) PS2 games had uncompressed textures because the developer could obtain better graphical performance from the PS2 that way and as a result had long loading times (sometimes in excess of 1 minute). So using more space may not be a good idea.
Re:My Dryer (Score:4, Informative)
The mains connection for your dryer may vary with local code requirements. Putting four moderately-expensive cables in with the appliance to cover all of the bases doesn't make any sense.
-aRe:No component video? (Score:2, Informative)
What interlacing means in the context of video is that each frame transmitted is actually only half an image. The frame contains every other line of the entire picture. The next frame after this contains the lines that the previous one did not. Back in the 60s when color analog TVs where being designed, they built them to refresh only the lines that data was received for when drawing the current frame, leaving the previous frame still on the screen, filling in the lines that were not received with the current frame. The advantage of this is that you effectively double your screen resolution without using any additional bandwidth. Progessive on the other hand simply means redrawing the screen completely every frame, which is how computer monitors work.
Generally we consider interalacing to be a bad thing these days, since recent HDTV's natively use a progressive method for refreshing the screen (i.e. They don't use electron guns that can draw half of the screen at a time.) Becausse of this, in order to display an interlaced signal on a progressive, the signal must first be deinterlaced. Deinterlacing is *VERY* complicated, because you can't just take two frames and combine them into one, since despite containing only half an image, each frame still represents a different point in time hence any movement on the screen between the two time shoots will look very wierd using this method. Most of the time deinterlacing mechanisms these days are not very well made because of the difficulty.
Component takes advantage of interlacing to get from 720p to 1080i (again the same amount of bandwidth can be used to transmit a double resolution image.) Whereas HDMI is pretty much DVI with the following additions: Audio is sent with video and a method for encryption exists to prevent you from recording images off the cable (DRM basically.) Most modern HDTVs will be able to handle both.
Re:This is not news. (Score:1, Informative)
The fundalmental flaw in your position is that HDMI is equivalent to HDTV. Only the latest HDTVs have HDMI. I guess you have missed the other posts on Slashdot of early adopters of HDTV lamenting the fact that their TV's do NOT have HDMI connectors. If the objective is to connect to as many HDTV presently out in homes the cable that maximizes that is component, not HDMI.
In two or three years it would be a dumb idea not to include the cable (at that point the number of HDMI tvs should far outnumber the number of HDTV without it). However, for this initial distribution run, there is isn't motivation.
Re:Pinch Those Pennies! Ouch! (Score:3, Informative)
People buy expensive cables hoping for an improved visual experience, and in the case of digital signals they aren't likely to see a difference unless they are noticing a specific problem with the cheap cable.
Re:Blu-Ray curse (Score:3, Informative)
Yep! And enough DRM to not use any of it properly!
Re:Bastards! (Score:5, Informative)
Digital doesn't guarantee delivery (Score:3, Informative)
Not 100% accurate, as HDMI (which uses DVI signaling for the video portion) does not have any error correction built into the signaling [ecoustics.com]. (See also the bottom of this page [ramelectronics.net] for similar info.)
This means that bit errors can creep in and degrade image quality when using low-quality cables, especially in an electrically noisy environment. I don't know about you, but I have a rat's nest of cables behind my AV rack; even with cable management, some cross-talk is unavoidable because of the sheer number of cables in close proximity.
Poor shielding is only one problem with cheap cables, though; you also have issues with improper termination (i.e., poor impedance matching) at the ends of the cable, something that makes a huge difference at the frequencies that DVI/HDMI operates at.