'Stargate: SG-1' Cancelled 605
Ant writes "The Sci-Fi channel has announced that it will not be renewing its (very popular) original series Stargate SG-1 for another season.The spinoff series Stargate: Atlantis will get the nod, though, airing for a fourth year. SG-1 aired its 200th episode on August 18th, and the SF series is the longest-running SF show on American television." Gateworld has further details: "New episodes of both Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis continue Fridays this summer starting at 9 p.m. Eastern/Pacific, leading up to the mid-season finale on September 22. The second half of the season will begin in March, leading to SG-1's final bow on SCI FI in June."
Holy Hell (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again (Score:5, Insightful)
Explain that one to me please? They cancel things like Farscape and SG-1 but put the ECW on there??
We should probably start calling it the B-Channel. B for Bad.
Oh well. If they keep canceling shows I'll be able to lower my DirecTV bill by going to the basic package that doesn't have them on it. If one of their shows turns out to be good enough to escape their massive suckage it'll show up on some other channel or DVDs.
Re:Contract costs or ??? (Score:5, Insightful)
In general, all good things should come to an end (especially with an episode entitled "All Good Things...") and it actually isn't that uncommon to end a series at its height.
Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg (Score:3, Insightful)
All they have left to hold dedicated viewers is Battlestar Galactica.
What else is there to watch on that network now?
Re:Contract costs or ??? (Score:3, Insightful)
SG1 = TNG; SGA = Voyager (Score:1, Insightful)
Too Many Secrets (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:it was inevitable (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:So Long and Thanks (Score:5, Insightful)
Scifi being Scifi (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again (Score:3, Insightful)
Then in my opinion:
1) They've attracted the wrong audience.
2) They've decided that they can't attract the right audience - or they don't know how.
3) They have become even more suit infested and this is the beginning of the vampyric draining of the SciFi network.
If it's the first then they need to do more research. They should be researching Science Fiction/Fantasy conventions and Renaissance Faires not just Nielsen ratings. They may be doing that - I don't know. But if this first point is true then they are not doing it right.
The second point goes right along with the first. From what I've seen of the programming on SciFi I suspect there are only a few at that channel that truly understand what Science Fiction/Fantasy is all about. (And before you flame me for including Fantasy at least that's within the realm of possibility for this channel unlike ECW or WWTBAS.)
My greatest fear though is it's the last one. SciFi Channel has made enough money to attract the hungry vampires from other corporate cultures and is going to go down the drain very shortly leaving only a husk of its former self.
Lastly - you mentioned budget and that ECW was making money for them that they could use to fund other good SciFi shows. Look back at some of the truly popular SciFi stuff from the past. Look at what kinds of budgets they had. I'm sure you can think of at least a half-dozen good shows that had little or no budget but were fantastic! That tells me that good SciFi doesn't need a lot of money but rather someone to care about the genre and to have good writers and good actors. Often some of the best of those don't cost a lot. If SciFi Channel can afford ECW it can afford to make new series.
I for one, am glad (Score:5, Insightful)
With that said, season 9 actually surprised me with how well they managed to do, even with Richard Dean Anderson leaving, Don Davis being gone, and Amanda Tapping out of commission for a few months. Ben, Beau, and Claudia didn't feel right at first, but I gradually came to like the direction the show took; and at least there's always still Daniel and Teal'c. Plus, the Ori have been a pretty damned interesting new enemy. However, I'm glad they're cancelling the show. I'd rather them finish the Ori story reasonably quickly and end the show on a moderately high note (probably not as high as season 8, but high nonetheless) rather than dragging it on and on. While it's commendable how they've handled the transition to the new cast, it's not something that can be kept up indefinitely.
Firefly comment is spot on (Score:2, Insightful)
If Serenity is any guide, I'm thrilled Firefly ended abruptly.
That's always been a strength of a lot of anime and a fair amount of BBC programming:
it has a beginning, a middle, and an end. They don't try and string it out for as long as
possible. The ones that do suffer the same fate as US shows.
I read an interview with the producer of Star Trek: The Next Generation season six,
and she said that they had the ep they were shooting, one they had pretty much written,
and some basic ideas for the next one and that was how they went through the whole
season. I don't like Start Trek anyways, but any show would have trouble being of high
quality under those circumstances.
Always leave 'em wanting more, right?
Maxim
Re:Killing the Goose that lays the golden egg (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:So Long and Thanks (Score:5, Insightful)
My other problem is that eventually you end up at a point where some genius with access to the script decides to, for example, destroy a sun in an easily repeatable way, and then for the rest of the series, blowing up a sun is a solution for every problem but has to be ignored. It is short sighted and every writer should read their script and look for these obvious and completely avoidable future plot holes.
Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again (Score:4, Insightful)
At any rate, they've faired far better than the Simpsons, which didn't even have the good sense to step aside when it spawned a truely great comedy.
This is over due (Score:2, Insightful)
My biggest beef, if there always has to be this epic war, and each time they win, they have to come up with a more powerful enemy. This has happened to the ridiculous extreme till they are literally fighting "gods". This is a bad sign, a sign that they are running out of ideas. This is the sort of thing DS-9, a very sub-par substitute for TNG, did to boost its ratings. They had a 3 year war between the federation and dominion.
A good sci-fi show should be able to sustain interesting plots without the constant backdrop of annihilation. And when you keep replacing old enemies with more powerful ones, it degrades the battle with the old and the new enemies become ridiculously powerful after a while.
I hope they wrap up this Ori crap soon and never return to the ascending being junk. However that seems unlikely, because they have just introduced a new antagonist into Atlantis. I guess the Wraith aren't enough to deal with.
Thank God! (Score:3, Insightful)
Argh!....Stupid Stupid Stupid....SCIFI Channel! (Score:3, Insightful)
So now that it's dead... (Score:1, Insightful)
I have no idea who owns the rights to the series (Does Fox still have them?), but Sci-Fi should gobble up Firefly and stick it in the gaping hole where SG-1 used to be. There'd be yet more fans, yet more of a convincing audience to make a sequel series, and if you're too damn cheap to buy the DVDs actually give people a chance to watch the series.
It's obvious (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Cancel Atlantis, too (Score:2, Insightful)
i don't think the show should be canceled, because there is far too few true sci-fi shows on anymore. (there's a lot of wannabes popping up on network tv, but they all want to incorporate crime or medical crap).
i generally like atlantis, other then the first season by far had the best episodes and everything out now does seem like a bad copy off an old sg-1 ep. that and i like the lt. ford better then i like ronin (he's just not a good actor, what more do i have to say?)
who knows... maybe daniel jackson will transfer to atlantis and next season may have some potential.
Re:Sci-Fi Does Dumb Again (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:nudity (Score:5, Insightful)
Pockets.
Re:It's just like... (Score:3, Insightful)
The only way to make it seem like he's a different character is to "hold him back".
Re:It's just like... (Score:3, Insightful)