Matt Damon as Kirk in Star Trek XI? 594
GiggidyGiggidy writes "Our friends at IMDB.com are reporting that Matt Damon has been cast to play a young James T. Kirk in the new Star Trek Movie directed by J.J. Abrams. Is this the end of the Star Trek series we fans know and love, or the beginning of something bigger and better for the series?"
At first. (Score:2, Insightful)
I thought this was just a rumour a few months ago (Score:5, Insightful)
Too Old!!! (Score:5, Insightful)
spock is the hard role (Score:3, Insightful)
Can We fire Rick Berman? (Score:4, Insightful)
just my thoughts
Don't trust IMDB (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Now, get Sinise. (Score:2, Insightful)
But that's exactly why he'd be the right choice. I mean, come on, like Bill Shatner brought such depth and character to the role... The shallowness is part of the "camp", and Affleck will be able to do that with perfection.
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:1, Insightful)
don't even joke about that!
Prithee, why, squire?
You do know that we've now had, continuously, more Star Trek then the gulf of time between the TOS and revival with movies and TNG, right? Give it some rest. Explore new horizons, frontiers, etc, with diffent casts, different races, different stories, having nothing to do with ST.
I for one loved The Original Series. I cringed at TNG, and after that (aside from 7 of 9) it's been a bad dream even a rarebit fiend wouldn't approach.
Re:Now, get Sinise. (Score:2, Insightful)
Depends how they're going to position it. Sinise is fifteen years older than Damon, so it's a bit of a stretch to suggest they'd be classmates at Starfleet Academy together (which seems to be the rumoured premise.) However, Kelly was eleven years older than Shatner, so the timelines bascially line up if it's a post-Academy thing, or is Bones isn't actually a classmate of Kirk's.
Re:At first. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:5, Insightful)
Lousy acting, lame plots, almost no finish. Sorry, but it simply doesn't live up to today's standards.
I thought DS9 was the gem in the group, but almost no one agrees there; oddly, some geeks just can't handle a coherent plot.
I liked DS9. (Score:5, Insightful)
And TOS was damn good when it was released. It doesn't look that as cutting edge now, because the edge has moved on.
The problem is that the Star Trek franchise has not kept up with the edge. Now they're afraid of the edge. They don't want to make a show that small core will love for years and years and years. They want a show that almost everyone will sort of like and probably watch every week. They want "Friends"
They want "episodes", not stories.
They want light, cute actors, not developed characters.
Re:Don't trust IMDB (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:At first. (Score:3, Insightful)
No, Matt Damon's acting is painfully identical in Good Will Hunting, Bourne Identity, and Dogma, despite the character being very different in all three movies.
"Besides Damon will make at least as good a Kirk as Val Kilmer was Batman."
Somehow that doesn't make me feel any better about the decision. Maybe if Damon would make as good a Kirk as Kilmer made a Chris Knight...
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:5, Insightful)
Bring on the new blood (Score:2, Insightful)
I think www.newvoyages.com is probably where paramount should look for guidance. They've cast all new (and pretty much unknown) actors for the roles. Take a look at the episodes, the story lines, IMO, are on par with the original series. Sure the acting and special effects are a little shotty, but overall, that's the best ST story lines I've seen since TNG.
Bottom line: If Star Trek wants to continue with the Kirk / Spock story lines, we need to realize that they're characters, and not the actors, that we like.
Re:Shut up 'Maaatt Daaaamon' fags (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Can We fire Rick Berman? (Score:4, Insightful)
I dunno about you, but for me, the appeal of Star Trek was always the interaction between the characters of Kirk, Spock, McCoy, and to a lesser extent, Scotty and the other bridge crew. Their friendships felt genuine and it was fun to watch them tested by various forms of ridiculous melodrama. "Next Generation" was a decent show from time to time but I never got that feeling from it, and all the other series and all the movies since "Khan" -- especially when they started playing it "for action" -- seemed like mindless fanboy garbage.
Re:I liked DS9. (Score:5, Insightful)
There's one Problem with that. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I liked DS9. (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm sure Ron Moore was in agreement with that, and that's why he moved on to Battlestar Galactica. You can't skip and episode of that show or you will be pretty lost. It also is pretty edgy, dealing with modern day ideas of terrorism, military power, and political espianage. And although this point gets argued, I'd say it has the best FX of any Sci-Fi show on TV right now.
Re:I liked DS9. (Score:5, Insightful)
Joss Whedon would be a good writer for it (Score:4, Insightful)
Why not use Joss Whedon as chief writer and use the gang of two to fill in "Star Trek" details and to organize it into three-acts?
My goodness, Firely/Serenity were so good!
Don't skimp on space, ethics, and phaser fire, though....
Re:I liked DS9. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I liked DS9. (Score:3, Insightful)
Star Trek is too expensive to make to only appeal to a small core.
Star Trek has never had developed characters.
That was the original idea behind "Andromeda" (Score:5, Insightful)
If you watch the show, especially the episodes when they were still using one of the writers from Bab 5, you can even see how some of the "Andromeda" aliens mapped to the Star Trek species they were based on.
In short, Roddenberry WANTED to trash the Federation and run the universe from a point of collapse and chaos. What happened was that his notes got used to start a new show, the "Federation" got renamed the "Confederacy" and it was treated to a decent special effects budget and not much else.
If you watch it as a post Federation show, and mentally map some of the alien species to their Trek counterparts, the show actually becomes watchable.
After all, Shatner taught all of us to look beyond the acting.
Mod parent up. (Score:4, Insightful)
Particularly with how Dax was killed by evil ghosts while on a quest to save the Orb of Prophecy so The Emissary could perform the Rite of X and seal the Portal of Y.
They ran out of real story so they tried to stitch in a DnD plot line and they ended up with the standard fantasy cardboard characters.
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, yes. But the problem is that creativity happens rarely, and what you often get is warp drive/phases/the federation etc. simply re-packed with different names, so why not use the original? It is a known fictional universe, which means that much is 'given', and you have an established fan base. Also, I feel that there could be a lot of creativity based on Star Trek, especially now that special effects are cheap (and assuming good writers are used).
Sci Fi'ers vs. Trekkies (Score:2, Insightful)
It's always about the LIQUID. But lets wait and see. I mean, good can be financially good too... right???
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:5, Insightful)
It got cancelled, and the movie did really poorly at the box office.
As geeks, we should'a been out there supporting Joss and his "new sc-fi series, with new characters and new stories and it is not based on a universe that lasted for 40 years".
I personally feel bad that I only saw the movie twice at the theatre.
We bitch about nothing good on, but then don't support it when it shows up.
Re:Oh, Yes! (Score:4, Insightful)
Amen. Notice how most people talk the talk, but have second thoughts about walkin' the walk? In my hometown, many people complained about there not being any 'real' cinema. I actually went out and did something about it, screening films in a local cultural center once a week, with no admission cost.
Guess what? NONE of the people, both men and women, who complained about lack of options in town, have shown up during the ten months I've been screening films, sheepishly delivering a barrage of chronic excuses:
- "I was busy"
- "I forgot (and went out on the town)"
- "I don't have time" (but they do have time to go out on the town on that same night, week in and week out)
- "Etcetera"
Fortunately, I have built up a modest but loyal audience, mainly composed of college science students (astronomy and oceanography).
But if I hear any more complaints from poseurs, I'm gonna laugh in their face, spit in their eye and piss in their ear.
Bah! (Score:2, Insightful)