IBM Opts for AMD 195
ExE122 writes "Since the unveiling of the low-cost, low-energy AMD Operton in 2003, Intel has been struggling in the server-grade processor insdustry. Now, IBM has announced their decision to use the AMD Opteron processor in their new line of BladeCenter servers. System x3455, x3655 and x3755 rack-mount servers, two-way Bladecenter LS21, and four-way LS41 blade servers sporting the new AMD processors have already been announced. IBM will continue this transition over the next three months.
From the article:
"IBM's choice is by all means an important victory over rival Intel, which is struggling to sell the remaining deposit of server processors before the general acceptance of Woodcrest X5100 chips. Unfortunately for Intel, at the end of the second quarter, Advanced Micro had 26 per cent of the market for servers built on personal computer chips, more than double its share a year earlier, according to Mercury Research."
Could this be lights out for Intel?"
From the article:
"IBM's choice is by all means an important victory over rival Intel, which is struggling to sell the remaining deposit of server processors before the general acceptance of Woodcrest X5100 chips. Unfortunately for Intel, at the end of the second quarter, Advanced Micro had 26 per cent of the market for servers built on personal computer chips, more than double its share a year earlier, according to Mercury Research."
Could this be lights out for Intel?"
Odd.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Not too suprising (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Lights out for PPC? (Score:3, Interesting)
My understanding is that their new generation of blade servers will let you mix and match Power and x86/Opteron blades on the same backplane, so that you can mix and match whatever you want, in order to fill your needs.
Frankly, this might be a good thing for Power if it's true, since it might allow customers who aren't ready to jump to Power completely (as in, buy a system that's exclusively Power based) to get a system that's mixed. Or get a predominantly x86 based system, but pop in a few Power boards to see how they work and really compare them apples-to-apples under whatever their business workload is. If Power is as good as IBM says it is, that can't be anything but a good thing.
IBM not offering an x86-based blade system would be just suicidal; they have a great brand name but it's not enough to keep people buying their RISC stuff if what they really want is x86.
lack of competition, not too much competition (Score:5, Interesting)
Regards,
Art
My thoughts exactly (Score:3, Interesting)
Except I was thinking that even if Intel chucked their whole x86 line, they still make a boatload of other chips. Like XScale [intel.com], for instance. Their previous line of ARM processors (the SA-1100 family) are freaking *everywhere*.
AMD to hold and possibly take back ground in '07. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Not too suprising (Score:5, Interesting)
However. Process codevelopment hardly predicts systems codevelopment-- Just ask Sony and Toshiba, who collaborate on silicon but are on opposite sides of the HDDVD vs BluRay battle.
Hypertransport (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Sun made the move in April (Score:3, Interesting)
The power savings for 50-60 racks full of 1U servers could be significant.
Re:Lights out for PPC? (Score:3, Interesting)
These days, IBM continues the POWER brand, but since the POWER3 (I think) these have been PowerPC chips. The difference between POWER and PowerPC these days is the target audience, not the instruction set (although some PowerPC chips do include a set of vector instructions not found in POWER).
Re:Sun made the move in April (Score:3, Interesting)
Rack mounting rails in the Netherlands [dell.com]: EUR. 20,-
Rack mounting rails in the USA [dell.com]: from $99 to $129
That's a pretty bad difference. Caused by pure pricing strategy or am I overlooking something?
Re:Apple Curse? (Score:3, Interesting)
As for their lack of neutrality - they can't be neutral because of the differences between AMD and Intel optimizations etc. Yeah, they're both x86, but Apple likes to be able to know EXACTLY what they're shooting for, hardware-wise, and to integrate hardware and software as fully as possible to make their stuff "just work." I'm sure they *could* handle using either Intel or AMD stuff, but there would be more overhead, and I am sure that, due to the exclusivity, they're getting a little extra help from Intel when it comes to optimizing OSX & other applications.
Re:That's an easy one. (Score:3, Interesting)
A GI chatting with his girlfriend over VideoChat
A mom making a DVD of her newborn addressed to her own mom
A dad making a movie of his boy's baseball game
Things like that. Right now by focusing on price, value, or performance they paint themselves as me-toos and knock-offs.