Apple Newton vs Samsung Q1 UMPC 226
An anonymous reader writes "CNET has run a comparison between the 1997 Apple Newton and a modern Windows ultra mobile PC, the Samsung Q1. Remarkably, the Newton comes off as the winner. From the article: 'An operating system designed for a desktop computer will rarely shoehorn well into a portable device, yet that is exactly what Samsung has tried to do with the Q1. Very little consideration has been given to the differing priorities of desktop and small-form computer users. Windows is a one-size-fits-all solution, whereas the Newton OS is very specifically built for the efficient use of a small screen and stylus.'"
Round 2 (Score:1, Funny)
Only one thing I can say (Score:2, Funny)
Newton in a red shirt (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Newton Advantages (Score:3, Funny)
Q: What's two plus two?
A: Farm
Not a Cookie ... Fruit and Cake (Score:3, Funny)
Never get involved in a land war in Asia? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:MS falls victim to one of the classic blunders (Score:2, Funny)
Obligatory:
When was Windows a good solution for anything?
(Sorry, couldn't resist.
Re:Current devices lose site of simplicity (Score:2, Funny)
I'm sorry, "the success of the Newton"? Are you on crack?
Re:Wow, it's a review troll (Score:4, Funny)
However, in this case, a better car analogy would be to compare a '57 Thunderbird [wikipedia.org] (Newton) with a '87 Yugo [cartalk.com] (Q1). Er, a really expensive Yugo. With a really small gas tank. =)
The latest is not always the greatest. People will remember the Newton long long after the Q1 is forgotten. Love it or hate it, it's a computing classic.