Spyware Disguises Itself as Firefox Extension 247
Posted
by
timothy
from the not-yet-linux-compatible dept.
from the not-yet-linux-compatible dept.
Juha-Matti Laurio writes "The antivirus specialists at McAfee have warned of a Trojan that disguises itself as a Firefox extension. The trojan installs itself as a Firefox extension, presenting itself as a legitimate existing extension called numberedlinks. It then begins intercepting passwords and credit card numbers entered into the browser, which it then sends to an external server. The most dangerous part of the issue is that it records itself directly into the Firefox configuration data, avoiding the regular installation and confirmation process."
Not a vulnerability. (Score:5, Informative)
The trojan is opened as a Windows executable from email attachments, and writes itself into the Firefox profile's configuration directory.
MozillaZine Has More (Score:5, Informative)
Personally... (Score:4, Informative)
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions.php?app=fir
Emphasis on that. (Score:5, Informative)
This does not exploit any vulnerability in Firefox.
If your OS is not secure, no app running on it can be secured.
Re:Personally... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Is numberedlinks legit? (Score:3, Informative)
It is: "presenting itself as a legitimate existing extension called numberedlinks".
The McAfee characteristics page [nai.com] (2nd tab - stupid that that isn't directly linkable) also says:
Re:Not a vulnerability. (Score:5, Informative)
KFG
Re:Why is mozdev.org still... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Why is mozdev.org still... (Score:1, Informative)
Within Firefox, the trojan pretends to be the legitimate numberedlinks extension.
The extension itself is not the problem. The trojan creator just decided to have his extension pose as another in an attempt to be "inconspicous".
RTFA (Score:5, Informative)
For those of you screaming that "numberedlinks" should be removed from the mozilla site, that wouldn't fix the problem. The original extension is perfectly safe and NOT a trojan. This one is just spoofing it by installing itself with the same name.
A little more careful reading and some common sense go a long way
Re:Emphasis on that. (Score:5, Informative)
RE: Emphasis on that. (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, if you read the article more closely (and similar articles that have appeared in no shortage of other places), the malware pretends to be the numberdlinks extension. Your post implies that the actual extension is malware, and this is untrue.
Additionally, if you read the Slashdot blurb, it's explained pretty clearly there.
Basically, if you click on e-mail attachments without knowing what they are, it's your own fault if your computer becomes infested with viruses and spyware.
Re:Not a vulnerability. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Emphasis on that. (Score:3, Informative)
There is nothing about "vulnerability" that would stop the same thing happening on a Linux box. The only saving grace for Linux at this point in time is that your average Linux user is smart enough to not execute random executable files they receive from people they don't know in an email message.