In-Game Advertising Comes to Board Games 313
Grooves writes "Monopoly is getting rid of paper money in favor of credit cards. From the article: 'The new card, which resembles a debit card, is inserted into a small plastic reader/writer that can display and update the balance on the card. Traditional money is gone altogether, though purists can still purchase the original version.' Does this mean the end of complex Monopoly games where I charge grandma interest to borrow money?"
Easier to cheat! (Score:5, Insightful)
stacks of money (Score:3, Insightful)
Absolutely Shocked (Score:5, Insightful)
Mixed feelings (Score:5, Insightful)
On the other hand, this is going to make a lot of rulesets more complicated... ranging from embezzlement to the more common and legitimate Free Parking "put $500 and any taxes/fines in the middle, pick them up when you hit Free Parking" rule.
Neat idea (Score:4, Insightful)
Finance Charges (Score:5, Insightful)
What will kids learn from this? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Blast from the past (Score:3, Insightful)
When you have children, you'll understand
Re:Blast from the past (Score:3, Insightful)
And that is why it's not obvious who is going to win. It's a boardgame, you have to try and cheat and make unfair trades against the winner/person who screws you over most.
Big Mistake (Score:2, Insightful)
Almost everyone plays Monopoly with unofficial rules, like putting fines underneath one of the card stacks, and giving the stash to whoever draws the last card. Of course, these changes make the game more about luck and less about strategy. But who plays Monopoly, anyway? Not strategy geeks, or at least not mostly. It's small kids and other people looking for harmless fun that doesn't require a lot of brain power.
It's actually the purists who will like the new debit cards, because they'll be able to play a strict game without the hassle of counting all those stupid pieces of paper. But the non-purists — and that's probably 90% of the people who buy Monopoly sets — will totally reject this. Not because it's high tech, but because it leaves less room for invention.
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
Uhhh... yes it does. The merchant gets to pay VISA say 4% for the priviledge of letting you pay later and get 1% back. Guess what, the merchant you bought from had to raise prices 5% or even more in order to afford allowing you to make purchases with VISA.
As long as I make my payments it is a smart thing to do.
Negotiating terms, buying on account, and paying by cheque is even smarter. Not something you can do when buying a roll of toilet paper at walmart... but then the quote referred to "businessmen" not "walmart shoppers".
We used to do something similar (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
If you've got the money in the bank, there's no reason to use a debit card over a credit card. You are more likey to be a victim of fraud, and you don't get any credit rating.
I don't think you really understand how credit cards work.
Re:Big Mistake (Score:1, Insightful)
You have to form alliances and make deals with other players in order to win. The most common being forming joint partnerships over monopolies of colors; that is, one player with one orange for example gives his orange to another player who has the other two oranges and they agree to split all the costs and benefits of the monopoly and the "official" owner gives the other owner immunity from having to pay rent on those properties of course. So now those two players have gained a huge advantage over the other players. But when you form alliances or make deals you want to try to get the upper hand over the other party so that you stay on top. But then other players who are outside of the deal are going to try to convince your deal partner not to do it or to do something else, for example they'll make a counter offer. And there's where the real strategy and psychology kick-in because you have to wage propaganda wars against the other players, for example you can lure a potential counter-offerer into a bidding war and make him pay too much. Pretty much the possibilities and hence, brainpower required, are endless, as the rules of the game do not disallow any sort of deal-making.
Re:The old game is still there (Score:5, Insightful)
pretty much monopoly is just about perfect. The changing of the board does not affect it significantly. But if the money is gone, there is really no inherent benefit of monopoly over any other random game.
Re:Blast from the past (Score:5, Insightful)
How so? If one player gets really good properties and is on top, then the other players, if they are interested in winning, are going to team up in order to bring down the top player, so that he doesn't win.
Re:Deadbeat (Score:3, Insightful)
So, is it because they like me, or because they hope i'll spend more and _not_ be able to pay it off in one month?
Not alone, even among the estrogen-challenged... (Score:2, Insightful)
There are already electronic versions of monopoly the people play, it seems to me like the people who still fork out money for the board probably are after a differet experience - I know I am. But as long as there are paper versions out thre, I guess I can't complain.
Re:Great! (Score:3, Insightful)
And why not? I know people who pay their mortgage payment on a credit card (and I probably would if my bank allowed it), and my wife paid most of her college tuition on her Discover card. 1% cash back goes a long ways when you're turning over $1000 on the card every month.
The more important lesson is to make sure you pay it off every month.
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
Plenty of cards have no annual fee, and still give you miles/cashback/etc. Mine does 1% off everything and 5% off gas, which is especially useful these days.
Then again, I'm sure the credit card companies hate people like me, who are essentially taking advantage of the system.
Of course they'd rather we spend like typical consumers, but they still make a profit off the transaction fees.
Re:Hmm (Score:2, Insightful)
It certainly is. That doesn't prevent it from happening.
let me explain (Score:3, Insightful)
I am a credit card merchant. if someone pays me cash, I get 100% of the funds
if someone pays me via cc, I get from 96-98% of the funds
if I wind up doing a return, I lose 100% of the return.
for some transactions, credit cards are NOT appropriate.
NIIIIICE summary. (Score:4, Insightful)
Let's see first of all RTFA. It is ONE edition of monopoly. Not all future editions.
Secondly, the title of the slashdot post. "Advertising comes to Board Games."
Really? Ok, hrmm lets read the summary.. Odd No mention of this advertising...
Yes, I know Visa worked with Parker Brothers to make a credit card swiper for ONE edition of monopoly (only in UK and parts of europe so far). And they have the Visa logo on it... Of course, I know that not from this summary.. I guess it was good that I RTFA before slashdot posted it, so I knew what this post was about before I read the summary that misses the point.
Re:stacks of money (Score:3, Insightful)
With the debit card though, the playing field is pretty much level, everyone's got a plastic card at their side of the board and no one has any clue how much is on the card, presumably. Aside from when it's being read anyway, but still. Commanding visual presence > fleeting glimpse any day.