Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 Set for December 196
dolson writes sends in a heartening update straight from the Debian project's news page: "The Debian project confirms December 2006 as the date for the next release of its distribution which will be named Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 alias 'etch'. This will be the first official release to include the AMD64 architecture. The distribution will be released synchronously for 11 architectures in total.
At this stage, the upcoming release will ship with Linux 2.6.17 as its default kernel. This kernel will be used across all architectures and on the installer. A later version may be selected during a review in October.
New features of this release include the GNU Compiler Collection 4.1 as default compiler. X.Org will replace XFree86 as implementation of the X Window System X11. Secure APT will add extra security by easily supporting strong cryptography and digital signatures to validate downloaded packages."
Re:process (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Debian running current software? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Improved install? (Score:2, Informative)
-- stratus
Re:Debian running current software? (Score:1, Informative)
I think we're doing this the right way. We haven't changed our testing process. It was just that a lot of teams worked harder than before. Right now we've ~ 200 release critical bugs to solve until the release that won't be now in July, but in December. We're ok with our schedule and it will be stable as Sarge was and released on time. People just mix up stuff, because we failed to ship Woody (before Sarge) in time and in a sane way.
-- stratus
Re:Improved install? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Welcome (Score:2, Informative)
Re:kernel (Score:4, Informative)
I don't know if you are trolling or not, but I'll bite
As explained in this pdf file about the debian kernel here [vergenet.net], they remove non-free drivers. I understand why they do it, but I could see where it would be annoying if your hardware was effected. Here is a quote from the pdf:
On a related note, I sometimes get the feeling that they don't spend as much time polishing some of the rough edges off the kernel the way the Redhat people do with kernel patches and backports. But that is probably to be expected since they are (i'm guessing) mostly volunteers and not paid (like I'm sure the redhat engineers are). Regardless, I'm not looking a gift-horse in the mouth and I am thankful for their efforts. I'm a happy debian-stable user and look forward to etch.
Corrected link (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Architectures. (Score:1, Informative)
-- stratus
Re:Architectures. (Score:5, Informative)
I also run Debian on PA-RISC for my shell server. [no-ip.org] Add an account for yourself and do a few apt-cache searches to see which packages are available. All the major desktop and server packages are there (various apache mods, firefox, gaim, amule, etc). I found Debian to provide more modern software then HP-UX or BSD for PA-RISC. Even most of the somewhat obscure Debain provided applications are available. I run Debian and Ubuntu on x86, OpenBSD and Solaris on SPARC64 (Solaris is better for SMP systems), IRIX and Debian on MIPS (IRIX is better for newer Sgis like the Octane2), and HP-UX and Debian on PA-RISC. Overall I've found Debian to be the most portable complete Operating Environment. I have not used NetBSD that much so I am not aware of it's current state. It has a reputation for portability, but seams to lag behind in terms of real world testing (many of the ports apparently consist of cross compiling code), and also doesn't seem to have as many packages as Debian. Overall it just looks less up to date then Debian or OpenBSD.
Re:Improved install? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Preview Release (Score:4, Informative)
I'm an avid Ubuntu user, and I've been using it since Warty Warthhog. It's been my primary OS on my notebook since a bit into the Preview releases of Dapper Drake.
I love Ubuntu, and while I used to recommend Fedora Core, Ubuntu is all I recommend these days. However, I'm simply acknowledging the hard work the Debian team does. They're both great distros, but Debian lacks the Desktop polish I like in Ubuntu. Little things, like a splash screen and the community support is second to none.
I also know that Ubuntu contributes back to the community, and it does to a great job on hardware support, hence the "Ubuntu Hardware Database." My laptop has never run Linux so well since Dapper Drake was installed.
Ubuntu gets two thumbs up from me, and my post was 100% NOT flamebait.
Re:process (Score:3, Informative)
Re:process (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Will this include biarch support? (Score:4, Informative)
If I understand correctly, it will not be ready for etch (4.0), but the following stable release seems likely to have it.
Re:process (Score:2, Informative)
Just use backports.org. It has up-to-date packages ported from Testing and compiled for Stable. Including PHP5.
http://backports.org/ [backports.org]Re:Welcome (Score:5, Informative)
An "emerge -pve kde" shows a total source code download of 541,705 kB atm (For a KDE 3.5.2/Xorg 7 environment).
There are fewer packages for KDE in the Gentoo portage tree but thats because it's much more monolithic, there is however a modular set of packages for KDE. Either way the downoad size is almost the same, and i'd say their just as bad as one another to maintain.
I haven't run into many GTK apps that require Gnome libraries except maybe libgnomeui (provides additional widgets I think), which is small.
So quit trolling and think up something better than "make a poo proud" next time.