Louisiana Politicos Defend Game Bill 86
GameDaily reports on comments by LA Senators and politicians defending the Louisiana violent games law. The vigorous defense now has backing from the state's Attorney General, who has vowed to go to the SCOTUS if need be. From the article: "[Assistant Attorney General Burton] Guidry added that the law is 'not going to curtail the free speech of anybody,' but then he used the old 'games are training kids to kill' argument. 'This is more than speech. This is truly training for violence," he said. 'You assume the character of a mass murderer. You go out and kill people as violently as you can because you score more points.'"
I hate election years. (Score:3, Insightful)
I doubt the law in LA will last any longer then the others.
I hate election years.
Sigh. (Score:4, Insightful)
Even if there is a correlation between violent video games and violence, removing the video games is not the answer. There's a correlation between driving cars and car accidents, too, but we don't ban cars. Education and parental involvement is the best solution, even if it is not the most direct or time efficient.
This guy needs his priorities set straight (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:I hate election years. (Score:4, Insightful)
These are the worst kind of idiots, my friend. These are determined idiots.
repeat after me... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Killing for points! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Quotes of gold. (Score:4, Insightful)
It's just political grandstanding.
Yeah! It's not like written books train guys! (Score:5, Insightful)
Wait, you mean, they do!?
Hmm... maybe this isn't as stupid a law as most knee-jerk Slashdotters want to think it is.
Written books with diagrams and pictures aren't like word-of-mouth. They're visual. You don't listen about how a character beats up a hooker - you internally visualize the character and watch them to beat up a hooker with your own hands.
These book-burning laws aren't as ridiculous as most Slashdotters want to believe.
((I *do* hope the moderators pick up on the sarcasm here...))
Re:Yeah! It's not like video games really train gu (Score:1, Insightful)
They're pretty ridiculous, I'm afraid. The fact is, the vast majority of people who've beaten up hookers - to use your example - haven't played Grand Theft Auto, and the vast majority of people who've played Grand Theft Auto haven't beaten up hookers. While lack of evidence is not evidence of lack, the lack of a clear causal link in this case makes the assertions of those supporting this legislation spurious.
John Stewart's comments [youtube.com] following Lee Terry's remarks are by far the most cogent I've heard on the subject. The solution to problems involving children is not, by and large, the interference of an impersonal government, but the involvement of a loving parent. Unfortunately, we can't legislate that, so politicos whose goals are more style than substance cast about for unreal solutions to real problems, to present the appearance of solving problems which are momentarily insoluable.
Re:Anyone else ever notice... (Score:2, Insightful)
To them, it is not the least bit inconsistent to believe:
1. Jesus' teachings of ultra-pacifism.
2. It is a supreme moral duty to kill in the military.
3. They are truly "pro-life".
You see it every day. Faith-based ideology naturally is more concerned with the idea that your faith is strong, even if your position is totally nonsensical. It's more important that you honestly BELIEVE you are right, than that you are actually right.
This is why I can never respect a conservative idealogue. It's not necessarily the idea I object to, but the fact that, by and large, so little of conservative social doctrine anymore is logically consistent. It is too arbitrary, uninformed, and poorly supported, and I cannot, because of that, respect the ideas or motivations of the movement.
Re:Anyone else ever notice... (Score:1, Insightful)
Look, these people are wrong, and I'm pretty sure most of us agree about that, but trying to draw paradox where none exists ignores the true threat of these people. Only by understanding their logic can you combat them; spurious allegations of contradiction serve no useful purpose whatsoever.
Re:This guy needs his priorities set straight (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah! It's not like american football train guys! (Score:1, Insightful)
But it's still more violent.
And then there are all of those future slashdotters. What do they do when the football players join the army and kill people or start asking for tech support? Why, they play violent video games. As you can see, people who play violent video games become harmless, but a little pathetic, a rather sad situation.