UK Gives Go-Ahead to Gary McKinnon Extradition

robzster1977 writes "Judges in the UK have given the go-ahead to the extradition of UK hacker Gary McKinnon. McKinnon is accused of breaking into US Navy, Army and Department of Defense computers in 2001 and 2002." From the article: "On 4 July the secretary of state signed an order for Mr McKinnon's extradition to the United States for charges connected with computer hacking. Mr McKinnon had exercised his right to submit representations against return but the secretary of state did not consider the issues raised availed Mr McKinnon."

guantanemo for pushing the big red button

[know1]

If they leave the big red button there with no security around it or guards, eventually someone is going to push it simply because they can. This guy could have actually been destructive, and took their network down. He didn't. spare me the "yadda yadda it was very serious" replies, anyone with a glint of technical knowledge knows it wasn't.

Hail the new american slogan, "It isn't fascism when we do it!"

I've seen this guy in interviews. A clever man, who obviously has a lot more to give to the world. Shame he's going to get disappeared.

Truth, Justice and The American Way

[earthlingpink]

What's the consensus on this board, guys? Will Mr. McKinnon receive a trial of comparable fairness in the US as in the UK? If found guilty, will his sentence be proportionate to his crime (the DoJ has indicted him on seven counts of computer fraud, each with a maximum of ten years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine)?

Re:Freedom

[Anonymous Coward]

When the Nazis arrested the Communists,
  I said nothing; after all, I was not a Communist.
When they locked up the Social Democrats,
  I said nothing; after all, I was not a Social Democrat.
When they arrested the trade unionists,
  I said nothing; after all, I was not a trade unionist.
When they arrested the Jews, I said nothing; after all, I was not a Jew.
  When they arrested me, there was no longer anyone who could protest.

- Martin Niemöller

"Poor Dumb Son Of a Bitch"

[Quirk]

"Poor dumb son of a bitch", were the words uttered by Dorthy Parker over the casket of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald had sold out to Hollywood and, if I understand Parker's sentiment, Fitzgerald was way out of his league in the dog eat dog world of Hollywood.

Gary McKinnon is another poor dumb son of a bitch. He may well be mentally ill. There's a saying among criminals, don't do the crime if you can't do the time. I think McKinnon will get eaten alive, served up as a reminder that big brother cuts you no slack when it comes to stealing their information.

Master criminals execute plans, most convicts commit crimes. Convicts get caught up in committing a crime, they're their own drug dealers and they're junkies. Their brains serve them up a high that comes from breaking the law. Convicts fill our prisons and take their cred from the hard time they do. McKinnon is his own junkie, a convict juiced on committing a crime. His delusions will probablly cost him his life whether he gets to go on living or not.

just my loose change

Re:good

[biglig2]

Exactly right, even leaving aside the whole issue of how bad what he did really is, it is way too easy for the US to get someone extradited from the UK. They could put him in Guantanamo Bay for all we know...

I'm proud to be a subject of Her Majesty, and accept my responsibilities under her laws - but how come I have to accept rulings from a judge in Brussels or the US? I'm sure they're all very nice people, but they're nto the boss of me. Or at least they shouldn't be.

Please

[rockhome]

Spare me the "hacking i OK if I ain't trying to break shit" bullshit.

Every hacker that has every been arrested has always claimed that he was only curious and looking around. Let me tell you something, if you walk into my front door, locked or not, that is still trespass, I don't care if you just wanted to get a look at my collection of potato chips resembling presidents.

This isn't a witch hunt. If you even use a phrase like "I broke in", then you know what side of the law that you are on. These guys are just angry because they know they are criminals, they got caught, and now they are facing the full force of the law. When are all of the Mitnick humpers going to get a clue and maybe not do things tha are illegal?

Re:good

[Anonymous Coward]

how come I have to accept rulings from a judge in the US?

[1] Because you hacked into a computer in the US. Don't commit crimes in other countries, and you won't have to answer to their legal system.

[2] Because the elected government in your own country decided to ship your sorry ass over here to answer for your crime.

Extradite == make an example of

[purple_cobra]

Great to see the UK judiciary bending-over for a foreign power. Maybe there's a some sort of medal in it for you too?
McKinnon committed a crime here too and, as a UK citizen, he should be tried here. Of course, the USUK 'special relationship' is the most important factor here so the extradition order was signed without so much as a second glance.
"Britons never shall be slaves?"
Not in this day and age.

Re:Please

[Amouth]

when someone who just looks at unsecured goverment computers serves more time than someone who broke into some ones house and shot and killed some one for shit to pawn for money for drugs..

i am sorry but when the virtual world hits reality it doesn't seem that punishment fits the crime.

What happened to nationality?

[Kittenman]

Bit of a worry really. McKinnon is a British subject, found guilty of a crime against nationals of a foreign country. Why is he being extradited rather than sentenced and imprisoned in the UK?

Another case is Richard Read - the "shoe bomber" from a few years back. He was a British subject (admittedly they didn't want him) and is held prisoner somewhere in the US (or you-know-where in Cuba).

Does holding a passport, or nationality mean nothing? No matter what your nationality when you do a crime against the US, they get to do what they want with you.

Re:Freedom

[Chmcginn]

Umm... cause

A.)The DOD still owns it

B.)Unauthorized access of a federal government computer is still a federal crime?

Re:Please

[Gyarados]

If you'd bothered to follow the case from the beginning, you'd understand why so many people are protesting against this series of outrageous decisions.

The United States have, through massive exaggeration and dishonesty, virtually abducted a British citizen in order to make him a scapegoat on which to blame the exceptional lack of security in their government computer systems.

Re:good

[IgnoramusMaximus]

Don't commit crimes in other countries, and you won't have to answer to their legal system.

The Chinese government hereby requests your extradition for execution and subsequent trial for voicing opinions in direct oposition to the Party's doctrine on the Internet acessible (by mistake) from China. That is if Iranians do not manage to get you first for daring to speak ill of Islam (evidence of which was secretly presented in a secret prioceeding of a secret court). And so on...

Newsflash: the whole point is that one, by definition, cannot be held liable for crimes abroad if he/she was not physically there while commiting them.

An accusation of "computer" or "internet" crime does not magically change the basic logic of this, it would be equally silly if he had made prank calls to the Iranian Mullahs (severely punishable in Iran, I am sure) or sent booze by mail to the Saudi Crown Prince (which would probably get someone from Saudi Arabia beheaded if he had done so). The foreign laws simply do not apply to activities commitied while in UK.

[2] Because the elected government in your own country decided to ship your sorry ass over here to answer for your crime.

Which of course is the apex of the stupidity on the part of the UK government and an extemely dangerous precedent. In essence, the UK has acknowledged supremacy of US law and courts over its own by doing this. It is a stance of a poodle beaten into sulking submition, not a proud, independent nation.

Re:The trick is...

[killjoe]

This guy modded as being funny but it's sad. Every crime in america contains an adjuct sentence of repeated forcible rape and gang rape. Even for mild offences like check kiting, or smoking dope. Whatever your sentence is you have to add being raped several times a week to it.

That's what passes for law and order here. Being raped for all crimes no matter how minor.

Re:good

[wombert]

the whole point is that one, by definition, cannot be held liable for crimes abroad if he/she was not physically there while commiting them.

So if I push this big red button, and it launches a missile across the border...

Re:good

[Pantero Blanco]

The whole point is that one, by definition, cannot be held liable for crimes abroad if he/she was not physically there while commiting them.
So if I push this big red button, and it launches a missile across the border...

...Then your home country will prosecute you, or risk retaliation from the other country.

Re:good

[LWATCDR]

So if I broke into your bank account managed to steal a few thousand from you, you wouldn't mind if I didn't tired under UK law. Or at all?
I mean since I wasn't in the UK when I committed the crime then it really isn't any of their business.

Re:Please

[70Bang]

How soon we forget this story from the 4th:

Cambridge Breached the Great Firewall of China [slashdot.org]

Any ideas when Richard Clayton will be extradicted to China [from the UK]?

And based upon this statedment:

Clayton, speaking at the Sixth Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies in Cambridge last week, said that the researchers had reported their findings to the Chinese Computer Emergency Response Team.

It appears acceptable when testing a government's resources if it's from an academic perspective and you report any findings.

I'm not trolling or tossing flamebait out here. I'd like to know why these jokers are any different, other than it'll be China's choice whether to pursue them, or not, and I'm guessing not will happen because they were nice about reporting their results in the interest of benefiting the object of their efforts. But who gets to decide the intent of the party performing the actions, and after the fact, no less?

I can see an exception if Cambridge volunteered to do this with China's approval or if China commissioned the activities, either of those in advance.

Otherwise, what's the difference?

On damage

[rockhome]

The damage is probably pretty accurate. It might seem to you that if nothing were changed, then no harm done. I'd urge you to make that your corporate policy when any sort of break in, be it physical or electronic occurs. The fact is that any breach needs to be investigated, and every system auditted to ensure that nothing was put in place. I'd imagine that some systems were restored from a backup. All of that costs man power, down time, and lost data.

Re:Please

[johansalk]

What punishment do you think would fit the crime of someone walking into your unlocked front door wanting to get a look at your collection of potato chips? would you be justified if you wanted him hung, drawn and quartered to make an exmaple of him? It seems that the essence of the case against him for extradition is the doutful claim that he caused criminal damages estimated at $700,000 (that's $5,000 per PC), and for that he faces 60 to 70 years in an American prison. This all the while the Enron guys caused billions upon billions of real, indisputable damage to poor folks and were dealt not even a fraction of the imprisonment per dollar he's facing. In the UK this oddball would almost certainly face some counselling or cummunity service, whereas in the US he... fuck it, I don't even consider the US a civilised nation after Gitmo and "extraordinary rendition". You guys had that shitface Ashcroft and now you have that shitface Gonzalez.

Re:The trick is...

[bladesjester]

But, you never can tell. I know a lot of coders who take all sorts of martial arts. Most of them involve swords which won't do much good in prison, though.

Actually, the same techniques you use with a sword translate quite well to pretty much any other weapon - stick, rolled up newspaper, etc. Even just your fists.

The lines of attack are the same with any rigid weapon and most of the movements are as well. The problem is that almost nobody ever teaches that fact because most people who train martially do it for the wrong reasons (namely to be a badass or to compete). Those types of schools are often refered to as McDojos.

(Spoken as someone who's trained far too much martially)

Re:Please

[Millenniumman]

He broke into their computers. He is a criminal.

Re:This is not about hacking...

[Millenniumman]

Unfairly? He broke into their computers. He committed a crime. Now he pays the price. So far, fair. Nowhere is perfect, but the criminal justice system in the US isn't terrible. Most of the problems are inefficiency and letting people off easily, not overly harsh punishment. The USA is not a dictatorship. Human right are still respected. The NSA listened to a few phone calls between people in other countries and terrorist suspects. How does that violate my human rights?

Guilty!

[sean4u]

Only it's not a very grave crime, is it? I like the potato chip analogy - he did look at military potato chips, though, which most people would know is considered more naughty by most countries. I hope his counsel is good and makes sure the sentence fits the crime. I don't like it when somebody hacks my computer, it makes me angry. I'd want to be able to tell them how angry I was. I hope the judge stops there, and marks McKinnon's card, maybe wastes some of McKinnon's time and money. I think a custodial sentence would be harsh, but then, he didn't break my rules. And like others have pointed out here, you have to play by the local rules. I get the impression the USA isn't the worst place to be extradited to. At least they're doing it in public this time!
It's going to hurt a bit Gary, but you have been a naughty boy.

Re:Please

[Firehed]

The ease of him doing so is inexcusable. That's the point here. The security sucked. Yes, I know it's still wrong, but I damn well expect these organizations that PROVIDE national security to be secure (at least within reason). They're dealing with the guy as he should be dealt with, but they're flapping their gums about how he could have been or was a terrorist to cover their own asses - if he was planning to do something malicious, we could all be dead right now. This is one guy who was just playing around and managed to break into government systems.

Think of it this way. Someone breaks into my house. Sucks to be me, and the guy is still a criminal, even if no damage or harm was done. That same guy breaks into the Pentagon. Sucks to be the Pentagon, and the guy is still a criminal, even if no damage or harm was done. The issue at hand is that the metaphorical pentagon had a wooden front door with a $25 lock from Home Depot like my house, not the $millions steel-reenforced foot-thick armored god-stopper that can withstand a missile that it should have had. What the guy did was wrong and inexcusable, but not nearly as inexcusable as these government entities having absolutely shitty securiy - they're upplaying his role and intentions to make him a scapegoat for their own shortcomings.

The least we can hope that comes out of this is that they fix the security before some no-talent script kiddie that's a part of a terrorist organization or has other intents to do serious harm comes along and exploits the same wheel of swiss cheese.

Extradition to Uncivilized Nations

[m_member]

There is an argumenent in the UK at the moment about deporting and extraditing people to nations who have poor human rights records. I think a nation who imprisons people without trial and without legal representation is a perfect example. Step forward the land of the (mostly) free.

Re:Please

[PhraudulentOne]

When was the last time you paid, or were paid $5000 to find out what was wrong with a PC, and then wipe it?

How is $5000 reasonable at all?

Someone needs to go through the logs on each PC - ok, lets give them 10 hours @ $75/hr to do that. That's $750.

Now someone needs to wipe/reinstall the PC - we'll give them 5 hours for that @ $75/hr. That's $375.

Add them up - that's $1125.

That is for 15 hours of dealing which each PC. Yes, this doesn't include lost work, but its not hard to copy some Word/Excel/etc to your backup drive and then wipe Windows.

Oh, and BTW.. in the U.S. if you break into my home, I'm allowed to shoot you.. even if you are just taking a look around. I think that is reasonable (I have no idea why you're there anyway.. why the hell are you on my property?)

That's ridiculous. Yes, you have the right to shoot someone, but for you to find it reasonable to shoot someone because they were looking through you things is disturbing at best.

"Hey, I don't know why your here *BANG*"
"Oh, you were lost, or confused, or metally challenged and happened to be on my property. Sorry about that, but I AM a US citizen after all. I have the RIGHT!"