Freedb.org Ending 245
haroldag writes "Freedb, the free music database used by tons of CD ripping software, has been shut down due to a disagreement among its developers. One of its developers used a data dump from the original freedb.org and is providing the service at freedb2.org, though, and will be adding features and posting them at his site as they become available. Unfortunately, a database dump or source code for freedb2.org is yet nowhere to be found."
Re:Nothing to see? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Damn. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Freedb sucks anyway (Score:2, Informative)
The one whose cd hash matches your cd? [insert picture of guy attempting to slit his wrist with an electric shaver, caption: "You're doing it wrong"] Each of those hashes are (supposed to be) a completely different disc, and in the case of all these different hashes, I suspect that they're from people who got a copy "ripped" from their friend, except instead of an actual copy, the guy tooks some mp3s from kazaa and burnt a cd from them. Recipient discovered that freedb didn't have an entry for this bogus disc and made one.
Personally, I've been wishing for a long time for cddb/freedb to just die already so we can re-standardize on a system that doesn't use a collision-prone hash with absolutely no way to deal with collisions (and no, marking it as a blues/ genre because some other CD was already posted in rock/ is not "dealing with it"). Maybe freedb2 can fix this.
freedb2.org compatibility (Score:5, Informative)
Re:no honor amongst theives (Score:3, Informative)
Without the CD, the service is/was completely useless.
Re:no honor amongst theives (Score:4, Informative)
I rip my own CDs. Mostly because I like the convenience of listening to them on my laptop. Even here in Australia that is now legal, though it has always been tolerated.
Freedb just gives me track, artist and album names.
Re:Damn. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:no honor amongst theives (Score:4, Informative)
Re:no honor amongst theives (Score:3, Informative)
Freedb.org was invaluable to me when I was ripping the 700-odd CDs THAT I OWN.
Muppet. Accurate track listing database != music piracy. Get over it.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Freedb sucks anyway (Score:3, Informative)
Not quite. Apparently the hashes are an ad-hoc mechanism created specifically for cddb, and there *are* collisions.
Re:So.... (Score:5, Informative)
Time to replicate the database! (Score:5, Informative)
Today, you can get the
I, for one, have allocated a total of 16mbps of bandwith on four hosts to help seed this database. I'm seeing a total swarm performance of around 25mbps, so this should be a fast download for anybody who wants it.
Go ahead: feel the Power of BitTorrent and share this free database!
Share, my friends, share!
Re:I'd just like to say, (Score:5, Informative)
Grandparent's urls are Australian, he calls the project freedb2, and there's very little source code to be found: I'm guessing that he's this Australian.
Now, don't get me wrong -- I have the utmost respect for people who donate their free time to making software for gratis, but when that developer pledges (of sorts) to make a replacement to an OSS product, gets support from the developers of the product being replaced (was that support monetary?), and refuses to free that code, which in turn contributes to toppling another (well known and widely depended on -- yes, I know freedb still works, but still) project, I am slightly angered, to say the least.
And what stops him from now never opening that code? Replacing a FOSS product with simply a gratis product is a net loss, from where I'm standing.
Re:So what does this mean right now? (Score:3, Informative)
"to rip" pile, so I shouldn't have that part of the DB stored locally yet.
Re:I'd just like to say, (Score:5, Informative)
"freedb2 is the development project that played a big role in the demise of freedb. That the developer is advertising it here now, apparently trying to profit from what he caused is immoral in my opinion.
Additionally, using the name freedb2.org is stealing freedb's name. Furthermore horar has not yet released source code or a database dump, so as of this moment, freedb2 is a closed source project, which violates the GPL under which the database archives are released. Even if the GPL may not be enforceable in this case, not releasing a database dump is certainly morally wrong."
Re:Gullible? (Score:5, Informative)
In the meantime, I invite you to enjoy http://freedb2.org/ [freedb2.org] and browse as much of the source code as I have had time to document and post on http://asmith.id.au/freedb.html [asmith.id.au] and http://asmith.id.au/mod_libpq.html [asmith.id.au]
Re:no honor amongst theives (Score:1, Informative)
Re:freedb2.org compatibility (Score:2, Informative)
Re:no honor amongst theives (Score:3, Informative)
Wow...
It's posts like these that make me wish Slashdot had a moderation option for "-1, Stupid".
Freedb, like its proprietary and commercial counterpart, cddb, is a perfectly valid and legal service which recognizes the CD in your drive and downloads information about the artist, the album, the songs, cover art and sometimes even lyrics for display within your CD player software.
It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with theft or being cheap.
Re:I'd just like to say, (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'd just like to say, (Score:4, Informative)
source of parent post: http://digg.com/software/freedb_s_future_uncertai
more comments on freedb: http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/freedb_is_closing_
at any rate, there seems to be more to horar's involvement than originally stated.
Re:Good riddance (Score:4, Informative)
freedb has sucked for ages, though... (Score:3, Informative)
freedb has sucked almost since it's inception. Multiple entries for the same album, hard to do Various Artist albums, lots of misspellings and mistakes, and no way to ""fix" the problems.
I really hope people take this opportunity to check out Musicbrainz [musicbrainz.org], a MUCH nicer alternative. It's (mostly) open source, runs on Linux, Mac and Windows.
Also, it's community moderated like Wikipedia, and it has loads of information about releases, something which was nonexistent on freedb.
Re:Ahhh, those were the times (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I'd just like to say, (Score:5, Informative)
Please do your homework. The freedb database dump is released under the GPL with the following addendum:
This means, the moment you publish the database in any other format than a dump (e.g. through another front end), you must publish a dump of your own. If freedb2.org is using any part of freedb.org's database, it is currently infringing freedb.org's copyrights.
Re:freedb2.org compatibility (Score:2, Informative)
Re:freedb2.org compatibility (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Maybe move it to Wikipedia (Score:2, Informative)
Try wikimapia [wikimapia.org] -- it's like a wiki mixed with google maps.
Re:I'd just like to say, (Score:3, Informative)
Wrong. He does have to provide a dump, according to the GPL. The GPL requires you to provide the sources in the "prefered form" for making modifications to it. In this case, requiring to fetch the whole database query by query and having to convert the result back to text files would certainly not qualify as the prefered form.
For more information, see this section of the GPL FAQ: Can I use the GPL for something other than software? [gnu.org].
And here is an excerpt from paragraph 3 of the GPL:
Note that the GPL requires distribution from the "same place", so pointing to the original freedb mirrors would not be sufficient (and would not ensure that the data remains the same anyway). This is clarified in this section of the GPL FAQ: Can I put the binaries on my Internet server and put the source on a different Internet site? [gnu.org]
Re:Get what you paid for? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Gullible? (Score:2, Informative)
Only time will tell whether we were gullible to work with the developer of the next-generation server software or not.
Re:Gullible? (Score:3, Informative)
The problem is, right now, he's asking us to contribute data to him while trusting to his good will. That is exactly what CDDB did. Do you remember CDDB? They were the FreeDB before FreeDB. They took our data, then told us to fuck off while they sold it.
If he just dumped the code, there are likely to be just as many complaints.
True, but making the code better will not change that. No matter how good the code is, some jackass is going to find fault with it. The trick to Free Software is not making perfect software, but realizing that there is no such thing.
If Andrew (or whatever his name is) hasn't attempted to distribute binaries that contain GPL code (and I'm not sure we know that he has for a fact), then we need to back the fuck up.
Sure, that's fine, he can do whatever the hell he pleases. But we should no more go use FreeDB2 than go back to CDDB. As it stands today, FreeDB2 is proprietary. We all know what happens with proprietary versions of CDDB, because it happened. CDDB said they would be freee. They asked us to trust them. Then they took our data and told us to fuck off.
Moreover, he broke his obligation to FreeDB. FreeDB has our support because it is Free. At least one person, the person who started FreeDB, the person who grasped why we chose FreeDB over CDDB, expected him to maintain the agreement that is the core value proposition of FreeDB. If Andrew broke that agreement (and maybe he hasn't yet), then he has stolen from a Free project. Should FreeDB have insisted on the copyright like Apache does? Perhaps, then this wouldn't be a problem. Does that mean it's FreeDB's fault? Perhaps, at least in part. Does that mean we should stand up for Andrew (or whatever his name is)? Absolutely not. At this point, he is a maybe crook.