ChoicePoint -- What We Learned from Our Screw-up 60
xpangler points out an article in Baseline magazine in which "ChoicePoint's lead privacy & compliance executives talks about the 'more than 30' new practices and procedures the company has put in place since it mistakenly sold private data on 163,000 people to Nigerian criminals last year."
Re:Mental translation (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe it's just me, but a roomful of CxOs, including the CMO (WTF? What's wrong with VP of Marketing?[1]), plus a lawyer can only equal one thing -- a PR push plus some moves to limit liability.
[1] Speaking of stupid CxO titles, what the hell is a "Chief Administrative Officer"? We call those "Office Managers" around here... or maybe even "Chief Operations Officer" if we're feeling perky. But who wants a title that screams "Long-tenure secretary"? Maybe it's just a problem with assigning titels to people who sit on the board of a company (e.g., are legal Officers) but fulfill more mundane roles in terms of operations.
Re:Mental translation (Score:1, Interesting)
That was my point. If the worse thing that will happen is a small fine and a hand slap, why would they take the risk of actually doing something illegal and going to jail by actually trying to cover up the mistake?
Non-US? (Score:3, Interesting)
To who? ECHELON?
Love this quote... (Score:1, Interesting)
Oh. NOW. That would have been my first idea. Sensitive data? Encrypt it!
That's why I don't work in network security.
Re:Now they need to do quality control (Score:1, Interesting)
Turn off the spin (Score:4, Interesting)
It was a total of $15 million, plus another $4 million in other obligations imposed by the FTC (like third party auditing). Insurance covered $11 million of the $19 million, but Choicepoint had to pony up $8 million of their own money. If you look at their financial statments, you'll see that it's no slap on the wrist - it represented half of their cash. In terms of yearly income, it's about 7% of what the company makes. Plus, I suspect that their insurer will either raise their liability insurance rates or drop them altogether.
I'd say that the penalty was fair. It's not necessary to drive the company out of business - just necessary to give them a sting so that they don't do it again.
-h-
Progress Indeed (Score:2, Interesting)
Their Other "Mistake" (Score:4, Interesting)
Consider the Source (Score:3, Interesting)