Futurama Returns 553
GrumpySimon writes "Good news everyone!
Straight from a one-eyed alien's mouth - 13 new episodes of Futurama have been confirmed by Katey Sagal on Craig Ferguson's Late Late Show. All the original actors have signed up too."
Restrike while the iron is still warm? (Score:5, Insightful)
While I applaud it, I remember the resurrection of Ren & Stimpy and how it just wasn't quite the same anymore. The making of a popular series can often rest on the frenzy of creating the episodes and the chemistry of those at work on it. Add an interruption, time for other projects and influences, what will become of pulling the team back together? Will it be the same, or will it be like, "well, Bender saying, 'bite my shiny metal asee' doesn't totally suck, but it's just, you know, different now."
Other news in the It's About Time Department:
In other good news, finally on DVD, Yellowbeard! Arr! July 27 for USA & Canada [amazon.com] or July 10 for UK [amazon.co.uk] No word yet on extras, like Group Madness, the documentary of making of the film.
Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not because the writers got worse. It's 'cause you got better. Or at least, I did. I can't stand the old Ren and Stimpy episodes now.
Just like Family Guy, Futurama still cracks me up. If they make more, I'll still like 'em.
*sigh* (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Futurama (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Futurama (Score:4, Insightful)
- Nibbler shows up and sticks around, the order of those episodes has some significance
- Leela's parents are discovered, then are characters on the show after that.
- Farnsworth's clone is created and is in future episodes.
Just to name a few.
typically everything that happens is straightened out by the end of the episode as needed. It's just not in the typical cartoon genre to have numerous-episode-arcs, because reruns are not often shown in order.
And PS, the "OMG PONIES! AND NEW FUTURAMA EPISODES!!" is *really* old news. I assume this number of episodes is really just the dvds that were mentioned months ago. It's been on adult swim bumps for awhile now.
Re:Futurama (Score:3, Insightful)
Even if you try to persuade me for hours that red is a much better colour, you won't be able to win me over.
In short, nods to classic bits of comedy coupled with a great sense of absurd and sprinklings of science make a cartoon I love to watch. I love the voice-work in Futurama too, great characterizations.
Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Futurama (Score:2, Insightful)
You're missing something really obvious: different people have different tastes, and having different tastes than yours does not make somebody stupid or wrong. Just because you don't like these shows doesn't mean they are not "really funny".
You don't like them, and that's fine. Your tastes simply don't line up with the majority, and there's nothing wrong with that. Where it becomes wrong is when you become a condescending ass about it.
Re:Futurama (Score:5, Insightful)
Hell, there are a ton of other Slashdot articles you could be commenting on. Perhaps you could have found one that interested you. But no, you had to click on the Futurama article just so you could post a comment musing about the lack of appeal Futurama has for you.
It kind of reminds me of people who love Windows and hate the Macintosh. OK, your favorite computer platform has 90+ percent of the market, so why go seek out places online where Mac people congregate and try to rain on their parade? They have less than 5% of the market. Leave them alone. Hell, I've seen people go onto Atari ST forums and say ridiculous things to the effect that the Atari ST is long dead and ST enthusiasts should just move on and get a Windows PC. Was that you?
When you see a kid playing with a balloon, do you have an uncontrollable urge to go and stick a pin in it?
There are a lot of things that do not appeal to everyone. Sane people ignore them. Personally I have no interest in Chritianity. That doesn't mean I show up to church every Sunday and say, "You know, I just don't understand the appeal...could you explain it to me?" It would be gouche and idiotic to do so.
"Not trolling"? Bite my shiny metal ass!
Re:Futurama (Score:4, Insightful)
My take was that it was consistant that Lisa was a little hippie shitdisturber. Maybe you watched an OLDER episode where they haven't yet developed that trait? Simpsons is popular because it's older than most of the audience. It came out in the late 80s. I was babysitting kids born in the 90s who liked the show even though their first memories of the show were probably from 1996 onward.
Futurama is funny because it's silly and creative. Family guy is funny because it's a bit more adult and off the wall. South park is funny because they're highly objective and use hyperbole.
That doesn't mean EVERY episode is comedy gold. But normally people tend to watch the series not just specific episodes which means watching the occasional shit-fill-the-season-out episode.
Tom
Re:Get yer facts straight! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Futurama (Score:5, Insightful)
Because it's not about you.
2 F's down, 1 to go! (Score:5, Insightful)
But what about...? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Welcome back! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Dude, there's a whole universe in all of us... (Score:5, Insightful)
I never said otherwise - I was just hassling my PP for overanalysing. What next? "Oh, but at the end of The Simpson's 3D, homer ends up in the real world, but then in the next episode he's back in the Simpson's universe!". Or "Buffy is just so fake: There's no such thing as vampires!"
No. Like many people here (yourself included), I prefer Futurama to Dr Who. Anyone who tries to argue that one successful show is better than another successful show is an idiot, and you might as well be trying to prove the existence or non-existence of god, or the general superiority of one OS over another. It's a personal thing. One is better than the other for you.
I have - many times. The first time I watched it, I watched it out of order. Yes, I didn't pick up on the exact history behind each character, but I didn't miss out on any important story-line elements. (Ok - so the same is probably actually true for Dr Who, but there are many other shows where missing a couple of episodes makes the later ones not worth watching).
Re:Futurama (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Who needs comedy central? (Score:5, Insightful)
also, your model doesn't work for new shows.. if your model was in place before Futurama, it would have never been created.. people won't donate to a show they've never heard of and have no idea if they'll even like it.
*crosses fingers* (Score:4, Insightful)
Good news... kind of. (Score:4, Insightful)
The actors can be replaced, the writing team can not - not if you want to keep the same style of humour.
Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Futurama (Score:2, Insightful)
that's why I love the Slashdot 'Funny' mod. It always lets me know when to laugh at a joke, so I don't feel left out.
Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:YAY! (Score:4, Insightful)
I suppose there's no real need for that sort of continuity, as long as the continuity for the main characters broadly fits together, and it gives them more room for humour without being penned in by what they did before.
Fool's Gold (Score:2, Insightful)
The last time
On that note, I would personally love for Futurama to return but I won't get my hopes up.
Re:Good news everybody! (Score:3, Insightful)
It was a plot device so that they could have guest stars playing themselves without resorting to overused time travel plots like some other serious Sci-Fi shows. It sucked most of the time, but cameos often do elsewhere. It certainally had it's moments with some people though.
I'm not holding my breath. Series 4 and 5 of Family Guy suffered by having different writers etc and it just wasn't the same show. For example, Stewie has lost his "kill lois, take over the world" zeal which for me was one of the highlights of the show. I expect the same sorts of disappointment with Futurama, but the talent is there to surprise us if they put their heads together.
Family Guy Season 4+ sucks. (Score:5, Insightful)
-M
Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? (Score:5, Insightful)
I bought seasons 1-3½ on DVD which contains the original John K. episodes and the obvious downfall episodes after he was fired and Nickelodeon took over. All I can say is that the original first season still cracks me up, but everything afterwards is a sharp downwarn decline.
The interesting thing is to watch the episodes with the audio commentary by John K. Suprisingly, he does commentary on episodes after his departure, and he really gives a lot of insight to help understand why anything after season 1 simply was garbage. To hit a specific comment of yours, "two minute ultra-grotesque stills": it was something new and unique to R&S. In the early episodes, you can see how those scenes helped build storyline, express context or otherwise simply drive a concept home. However, most people took these scenes at face value and just thought, "ooh! he's got a booger!" or something like that. Yeah, it is accessible at that level. Unfortunately, this is the level that the post-Spümcø felt they needed to continue and exaggerate. To put it in John K's words when seeing a gross close up of Stimpy in a season 2 commentary, "ugly for the sake of being ugly". In other words, no purpose to the scene like there would have been in season 1 episodes.
Of course, this is a cartoon we're talking about, so it wasn't trying to save the world or teach you to eat your vegetables or anything; it was meant to be stupid humor for you to laugh at. All I'm trying to say is that this really was a groundbreaking show in cartoons and the first season was really something special in its own way. Unfortunately, that "magic" (if you will) was completely mis-interpreted and lost in subsequent episodes once John K. no longer oversaw production.
Re:Logic? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? (Score:4, Insightful)
The difference is that Family Guy and American Dad are funny the first time you watch them while the Simpsons and Futurama are funny every time you watch them.
Re:2 F's down, 1 to go! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Logic? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? (Score:2, Insightful)
Watch the scene where Fry falls into the cryochamber frame-by-frame. A mysterious shadow will be seen.
Re:Restrike while the iron is still warm? (Score:3, Insightful)
You call losing your sense of humor "better"? I feel sorry for you. Ren and Stimpy is brilliant beyond words. Not only that but it's been hugely influential. Spongebob Squarepants would not exist without Ren and Stimpy leading the way.
I don't understand why people change what they like. Ren and Stimpy, Rocko's Modern Life, Eek the Cat, all are as entertaining today as they were 10 years ago. And they're still better than most of the drek they play today.
Re:Logic? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Logic? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Welcome back! (Score:2, Insightful)