Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

MacBook Pro Batteries Swelling and Failing 388

JohnnyCakes writes "MacBook Pro batteries are apparently swelling, then failing. MacFixIt has some grotesque pictures of their own swollen MBP battery, which looks like it has suffered an internal explosion. Apple is replacing batteries on a case-by-case basis, but hasn't yet admitted any wide-scale issues."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

MacBook Pro Batteries Swelling and Failing

Comments Filter:
  • by daveschroeder ( 516195 ) * on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:10PM (#15584729)
    I currently have the issue [zdnet.com] where the machine simply turns off when the battery has reached around 30-40%, according to the operating system's battery meter.

    Then, there is the issue of some batteries swelling, slightly to severely. If this is shown to be heat related, it may be also related to the issue of too much thermal paste being applied during manufacturing [slashdot.org], thereby not allowing heat to be dissipated properly via the heatpipe and associated fans in a controlled fashion, but rather causing it to be dissipated in an uncontrolled way. Like, discharged into the interior of the case, affecting things like the battery.

    The battery has definitely not suffered an "internal explosion", as the submitter speculates. This appears to occur over time to the batteries that do exhibit this issue, and it is by no means representative of the majority of MacBook Pro batteries. We've got plenty of MacBook Pros here, and we have yet to see one that exhibits this issue in a noticeable way.

    These issues have not yet been acknowledged by Apple. While Apple is actually, from a statistical and reporting standpoint according to consumer organizations like Consumer Reports, the best at responding to these types of problems, it generally does not respond to or acknowledge any problems unless it already has a solution (or there is a defined safety risk that meets the muster of an immediate recall (which this is not (no, really, it's not))).

    When Apple does acknowledge and address the issue, if it is indeed determined to be widespread (and anecdotal blog evidence aside, there is no reason to believe it is), Apple does make it very easy to get a replacement. See the examples for the previous PowerBook and iBook battery exchanges here [apple.com]. Just type in the serial number, Apple sends you a new battery. In this instance, Apple is most definitely replacing batteries that have failed or swollen; so, the end result is that affected customers still get a new battery. And, in the event that there is any larger problem that hasn't been addressed by the battery OEM, if that battery were to fail, it has its own warranty under which it will be replaced as well.

    In any event, further awareness of the problem may adjust Apple's priorities in addressing the heat and battery issues on the MacBook Pro. For the record, with regard to thermal paste, Apple applies this much thermal paste on the new MacBook as well, and in the service manual, they specifically state that it is the correct, intended, and verified amount of thermal paste to be applying (even though that's a ridiculous assertion). So there's obviously more going on there, and anyone who has ever worked in a massive manufacturing operation knows how long a simple procedural change like this can take, and everything else that's involved.

    As an aside, from the level of coverage all of these "issues" receive with Apple products, I can't help but wonder if some people get the impression that Apple just turns out one shoddy product after another, when the reality is that Apple is generally and consistently considered to be the best in the entire industry for quality, need for repairs, technical support, and so on, above all other manufacturers.
  • Apple are shysters! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Threni ( 635302 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:11PM (#15584732)
    In the UK Apple have as good as told people not to buy iPods because they only last one year (despite UK consumer legislation protecting purchases for up to 6 years).

    http://money.guardian.co.uk/consumernews/story/0,, 1783814,00.html [guardian.co.uk]
    http://money.guardian.co.uk/howtocomplain/story/0, ,1738830,00.html [guardian.co.uk]

    Now it's apparantly not just iPod batteries causing problems! Very amusing.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:12PM (#15584741)

    Apple is replacing batteries on a case-by-case basis, but hasn't yet admitted any wide-scale issues.

    When has Apple EVER admitted to any wide-scale issues? They're notorious for sweeping problems under the rug and downplaying them. Only after people kick and scream with pitchforks do they grudingly admit to a "limited" problem, and sometimes they don't admit to it all but just quietly do away with the product (e.g., the cube Mac with the cracking case).

  • by Mr.Sharpy ( 472377 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:16PM (#15584761)
    My MacBook Pro was exhibiting the same behavior. The OS or hardware seemed to be miscalculating the charge in the battery. I could turn it off, remove the battery and let it sit for a while, then put the battery back in and it would seem to reset SOMETIMES but not always. In the end I had to make the call to Apple support. They sent a replacement battery out to me and things seem to be working better now.

    I feel like my MBP was definitely half-baked on release. Unfortunately, the kind of baking it is doing to itself now is not the solution. Ah, the perils of early adoption.
  • by Zaphod2016 ( 971897 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:29PM (#15584874) Homepage

    Before this year, I hadn't used an Apple since a IIe back in grade school. Why? Because most of my clients are office junkees, and it was just a heck of a lot easier to use windows in the interest of "compatibility". Then came news of the Wintel: a Mac that could do BOTH! I ran out and bought a MacBook Pro the week after they came out. Then my problems began...

    I will skip the horror stories we have all read about, but needless to say the thing is hot, loud and the tech support people are still in denial about everything. I gave up, and down-graded to a MacBook instead. All in all, the MacBook is a solid machine and a quality value- but it still has MANY of the same problems (and a few all its own). In other words, things I consider unacceptable at $2,500 I view as "good enough" at $1,000. Then again, I've been using Dells for the last decade...silly me for thinking quality was a function of cost, eh?

    I simply cannot understand why Apple would do this to itself. The iPod was a grand slam, and I was expecting these Mactels to DOUBLE Apple's market share in time for Vista. I had nothing but high hopes, which is probably why I am so disappointed now.

    Bad metaphor time: I come visit you the day a family member dies. Mom is crying. Dad is drunk. Sis is sneaking a cig. Unbenknownst to me, for 20 years your family has been normal and wonderful, but this is one hell of a shitty first impression. I tell myself "never again", and don't bother to return your phone calls next week.

    In the end, Apple nets even because I bought a second MacBook for the fiance. However, the way I see it, they still LOST a potential $1,500- and probably one heck of a lot of Windows users who are less patient that I am.

  • by Moofie ( 22272 ) <lee@ringofsat u r n.com> on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:35PM (#15584915) Homepage
    Hmm. I didn't seem to have Apple backed into a corner when I broke my iPod (cracked the clickwheel because I bashed it into the corner of a desk while it was in my pocket), and they handed me a new one.

    So, (my anecdote)+(your something like an anecdote)=not much, right?
  • by WindBourne ( 631190 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:45PM (#15584971) Journal
    For the last 10 years, I help my neighbor out with his mac. In this case, he has an e-mac that had a filesystem failing. I thought it was the OS so forced him to upgrade to tiger. When the problem continued, I checked up on other issues. What I found is that the emac has an issue with mb capacitors. So I popped it open to take a peak. Sure enough, they have started leaking. Yet, apple does not want to do a recall on this. Sadly, I fear that Apple is becoming no different than others. As it is, I will recommend that his next system have a seperate monitor/system so that if he lose his hardware again, then he can switch to a linux box.
  • personal experience (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Matey-O ( 518004 ) <michaeljohnmiller@mSPAMsSPAMnSPAM.com> on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:56PM (#15585027) Homepage Journal
    three MBP's, three batteries, all three fine.

    Now, one of the laptops lost two fans within three weeks of ownership...but that's offtopic.
  • by Stalyn ( 662 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @04:59PM (#15585048) Homepage Journal
    No it's your own selective perception. Maybe 1 out the last 10 [slashdot.org] were negative. Now... Microsoft... that's another story.
  • by Warlock7 ( 531656 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @05:09PM (#15585111)
    Probably a good idea to avoid them...

    Sad thing is that Apple gets the bad press over it.

    Here's a much more disturbing photo [xlr8yourmac.com] of one of those batteries. It was posted on Accelerate Your Mac [xlr8yourmac.com] on June 15.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 22, 2006 @05:11PM (#15585121)
    You have to be a plant from Apple to make a comment like that.

    Hardly any other site that's not solely focused on Apple is as pro-Apple as Slashdot.

    I've had comments modded down so often for even hinting that something could be wrong with Apple's strategy from time to time. Basically, either you're new around here and don't yet understand the nature of the site, or you're on Apple's pay roll.
  • by easter1916 ( 452058 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @05:15PM (#15585164) Homepage
    This is quite contrary to my experience over 5 years with three different laptops from Apple. The most recent incident; was using my MBP 2.0GHz one Saturday a couple of months after I bought it, and the airport died, then disappeared! About this Mac said none was installed... uh-oh. Then the same happened to the audio hardware. So I took it to the Genius Bar at the West County Mall in Des Peres, MO, the "genius" poked around with it, booted from an external drive, etc. No avail, service required, so he took my details and my MBP.

    I was contacted a few days later by Apple to inform me that the failure was due to spill damage... I was ticked. I knew I hadn't spilled anything on it, and I live alone (no kids, separated), and I RARELY have people over and hadn't since the Mac was bought. I escalated the complaint to Customer Relations, and they emailed me photos of the spill damage. I argued that that could have happened while it was in their custody, they held fast to their position. I asked how much the repairs would cost... just shy of $1000. I asked if they could do anything to reduce the cost, and the CR lady agreed to charge me 66% of the repair. I wasn't happy, but what can you do? I needed the machine back.

    I got my machine back this Monday. They had replaced the lower case, the upper case, the keyboard, the inverter, the main logic board and sundry sensors. Basically, a brand-new machine, containing a few of the parts from my MBP... why do many parts replaced? Then I noticed that they said it was a covered repair, meaning I don't pay -- and they haven't charged my card.

    I am guessing that upon further investigation / tech work, they found that the spill damage was just a small part of a bigger issue, and replaced all of the bad parts, and accepted that it was a warranty issue... they could still have charged me the agreed-upon $650, but didn't, even though I would have been none the wiser.

    That restored my faith in Apple. And it's consistent with previous interactions with AppleCare.
  • by Emetophobe ( 878584 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @05:21PM (#15585203)
    Sadly, I fear that Apple is becoming no different than others.
    After owning 2 ipods within the period of a year and a half, I would definitely say Apple is becoming no different than others. It took me 6 months for them to replace my first ipod under warranty, each time I sent it in to them, they would send it back a few weeks later supposedely "fixed". But, the same issues would shortly return a day or two after I got it back (songs skipping, hard drive whirring sounds, crashes, lockups, unable to boot it up at all, unable to sync my song list via itunes, etc..). After the 3rd time they finally agreed to replace it with a new unit, which is working fine so far (only had it for 2 months so far). The only good part wa that my old ipod was a 4th gen 20gig ipod and they replaced it with a 5th gen 30gig video ipod.
  • Re:Bad Mac Users! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ChrisA90278 ( 905188 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @05:51PM (#15585380)
    Yes, exactly. Could you imagine a typical PC user complaining that he can hear the fan running in his PC from "over three feet away". Of course not, noisy PCs are normal but audiable niose from an Apple product causes Apple user's to complain.
  • Re:Huh? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by daveschroeder ( 516195 ) * on Thursday June 22, 2006 @05:57PM (#15585408)
    Convenience my friend, simple consumer convenience. If I can walk in and purchase a new battery and replace it myself in 30 seconds, I prefer that to having to bring it and leave it at the shop.

    You don't have to. You can replace it yourself in 5 minutes instead of 30 seconds, the one time you'll need to do so every 2 to 4 years or so.

    Or you can just not get an iPod, I suppose, if having a battery door is really that important to you.

    And as for consumer benefit, don't you think there might be benefits in terms of size, weight, and unblemished, sleek appearance from not having to have battery doors or other access mechanisms? Because - and I hate to say this, because people don't seem to believe it - it WOULD be bigger and heavier. That's because it's not just a matter of having the back come off with screws. They'd need to design the innards such that the battery was physically segregated from the rest of the inside, likely requiring some tradeoffs that would increase size and weight, however slightly. If people want to think "Apple fucked up" or that this was done to make iPods disposable, they'd be completely wrong, for one (since the batteries can be replaced in myriad ways), and it would seem they'd also not be a good decisionmaker at Apple, since the decisions on the iPod so far have led to it having 92% share for portable music players.
  • Re:Bad Mac Users! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by twofidyKidd ( 615722 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @06:19PM (#15585509)
    My 20" Intel iMac has also been rock solid. Guess that makes two data points. In any case, there's been little or no coverage that I've seen regarding problems with those machines. Not that there aren't any problems at all, but they are few, and far between.

    And while this article is regarding batteries, the arguments are regarding first generation products, of which it would appear that the Intel iMacs have had little problems. The sweeping generalization that many people make about the status of quality regarding first generation products, whether they are Apple's, or any other company's products, is wrong.
  • Just yesterday I got it replaced at the local Apple Store.

    My hardware:
      First gen MacBook Pro 2.0 GHz (shipped the first week,) with 2 GB of RAM and the 7200 RPM hard drive. All firmware updates applied, running Boot Camp. (95% of the time in OS X, 5% in XP.)

    My symptoms:
    1. The computer would go to sleep, but wouldn't wake up. I would have to remove the battery, replace it, then plug the computer into the wall, to get it to turn back on. (I would *NOT* wake up from safe sleep, but would turn on from scratch.) This started out as an occasional thing, but eventually got to the point where it happened every time.
    2. Then it would start randomly turning off during use, and wouldn't turn back on unless I was plugged in to power. If I shut it off, it would start up off the battery, though.
    3. Then it would not run off the battery any more, but it did say the battery was there.
    4. Finally, it wouldn't even acknowledge that there was a battery. Tried resetting power manager, re-flashing the firmware, etc. No help. The battery's LEDs said it had a full charge, but the computer wouldn't even attempt to start on battery power.

    This whole process occurred over about two weeks.

    So I took it to an Apple Store's Genius Bar, and they did some diagnostics, then finally declared it a bad battery. (The Genius hadn't heard of any company-acknowledged failures that covered this.) Swapped my battery for a brand new one (straight off the sales shelf,) and went on my way. (I bought a second at the same time, simply because I had been wanting a second battery anyway.)
  • Re:Early stories (Score:3, Interesting)

    by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Thursday June 22, 2006 @06:50PM (#15585670) Homepage Journal
    But everyone seem convinced that men want to have babies all the time, and therefore would feel that anything that temporarily reduces fertility is a bad thing. I don't know any guys who feel that way, do you? In my experience, most people are worried about accidental pregnancy a fair amount of the time.

    The problem is that in some cases temporary infertility leads to permanent sterility. In order to sell this drug as a male contraceptive pill they would have to do extremely lengthy and expensive studies to provide that it works as such, and it is not entirely unlikely that they would have to stop selling it in the interim. (The current status could "require" reevaluation.)

    The drug I really want is melanotan, or alpha-MSH. There was an article about it in wired a while back, which prompted me to do additional research. Basically, it was originally intended to do what normal MSH, or Melanocyte Stimulating Hormon does; stimulate melanin production, causing darker skin, and increased resistance to UV. (Melanin is metallic.) It has two side effects; it suppresses appetite, and increases sexual desire. Wired's tagline was "Thin! Tan! Hotter than hell!" Sounds perfect to me. Now I'm just waiting for it to hit the market SOMEWHERE so I can internet-order it :) Unfortunately it's been continually delayed, and the reason given is the sexual appetite improvements. Mind-boggling.

  • by nzgeek ( 232346 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @06:52PM (#15585687) Homepage Journal
    We use LiPo batteries for radio control planes, and many of us have experienced swelling, and eventually combustion, because of the abuse that we put the batteries through. We demand massive current output to drive high-wattage brushless motors, and then get frustrated and charge the batteries at higher-than recommended currents so we can get out flying again.

    Then there's the whole cottage industry of R/C flyers buying 'bare cells' and soldering together frankenstein combinations of cells in series and parallel to get the perfect size/voltage/weight battery for the plane we are building.

    So in other words it comes as no surprise to me that LiPos in consumer products are swelling (and exploding) as the capacities and loads are increased, and as manufacturing perhaps gets shoddier as supply demand increases.

    As I mention here [gadgetophile.com], the more power you need, the more energy you need to store in a battery, and the higher the likelihood of some sort of catastrophic failure.
  • by Confuzzled ( 443836 ) on Thursday June 22, 2006 @09:29PM (#15586648)
    Incidentally, if you want apple store+iPod anecdotes, someone I know bought a nano at the apple store because they were told that they would get a $50 rebate when they got home, it was allegedly on the apple website.


    I call bullshit on this. The only rebate on the iPods is the back to school sale (going on now). There hasn't been any other rebate on the nano since it came out.

    Additionally, when an iPod needs replacement in the Apple Store, we have them on hand and simply give you a new one. The only time you have to wait, is when we don't have the part on hand. In that case we order a new part and you come back _with the nano_ to get a replacement (aka we don't send anything out).
  • by SteeldrivingJon ( 842919 ) on Friday June 23, 2006 @12:19AM (#15587313) Homepage Journal

    For what it's worth, I found that my Mac Book Pro was running hot, and was consistently idling at 40% cpu activity, when there didn't seem to be anything consuming that much cpu as far as top was telling me.

    It appears to have been caused by having Windows Sharing turned on. It was using that many cycles even when I was at home with no Windows machines on the network.

    When I turned off Windows Sharing, the cpu usage dropped to single digits, and the laptop has been running much cooler.

    Your mileage may vary, of course, but it might be something worth looking at if your laptop runs hot.
  • Re:Early stories (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Lussarn ( 105276 ) on Friday June 23, 2006 @05:46AM (#15588264)
    LiPo batteries gets destroyed if they get below aprox 3V per cell, or over 4V something per cell. Your speed controller in the helicopter cuts of before they discharge that much. Apparently something is not right with the cutoff voltage in these computers (possibly). It could also be a charger problem, if it puts to much juice in the cells. These batteries are fragile and should be handled with care, it's not unknown for them to burst out in flames if not taken care of properly by the electronics. So this problem is quite serious.

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...