U.S. Government to Adopt IPv6 in 2008 284
IO ERROR writes "The U.S. Government is set to transition to IPv6 in June 2008, according to Government Computer News: 'In the newest additions to the IPv6 Transition Guidance, the CIO Council's Architecture and Infrastructure Committee has provided a list of best practices and transition elements that agencies should use as they work to meet the deadline. The latest additions, (MS Word) released in May, are a compilation of existing recommendations and best practices gathered from the Defense Department, which has been testing and preparing for the transition for years, the private sector, and the Internet research and development community.'"
Experiment with Teredo (Score:5, Informative)
Re:USA, home sweet home (Score:2, Informative)
There's no place like localhost??!!?!?!?!
Sorry, never heard that one before.
Perhaps you meant "There's no place like ~/"
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Stats on IP usage? (Score:3, Informative)
Geoff Huston (2003) [potaroo.net]
Tony Hain (2005) [cisco.com]
Re:What are the Downsides to IPv6? Anyone? (Score:3, Informative)
Addresses are longer and harder to remember.
Packet headers are larger, so less data fits in each packet.
Multihoming still hasn't been sorted out.
Certain default configurations allow anyone to see your MAC address and thus track your computer more easily (but fixes for this are known).
Administration of a dual-stack network may cost almost twice as much as administration of a pure IPv4 network.
Re:What are the Downsides to IPv6? Anyone? (Score:5, Informative)
Uhh... what? One of the big advantages of IPv6 over IPv4 is that it will make routing *easier*, thanks to the hierarchical address space.
Re:Stats on IP usage? (Score:5, Informative)
Remember that a class A contains 16M addresses.
Re:Stats on IP usage? (Score:3, Informative)
try this link. It is a logical analysis of the state of IPv4 address space (it is all
regards
Re:Stats on IP usage? (Score:4, Informative)
However, a more recent study [cisco.com] by Cisco and others argue that we might be running out of addresses as soon as 2008 if the current consumption rate holds up. And with major pushes for 3. world countries to enter into the tech sector, my guess is that it is not a totally invalid assumption. They also argue how long the reclaiming of existing class A (or
There are also lots of problem by using the D and E class networks for general putpose traffic, since the D class is classified as experimental and E as broadcast, and so it cannot be guaranteed that all equipment can handle these addresses or will even allow these addresses to be used, since previously it would have been a configuration mistake to use these (especially the D class) addresses...
Re:Stats on IP usage? (Score:5, Informative)
As an example: In one well known red brick UK university you have to have a public IP address and you are not allowed to put kit behind a NAT even if that kit OS something esoteric and obsolete like the Silicon Graphics or AS1 that drives Bruker NMRs. As a result you have the choice to leave it unconnected which is a major annoyance as it is designed for network connectivity or to leave it at the mercy of the elements. This is done so that the "usage is not reduced" so that the overall university allocation is still justified.
While at it, IIRC the aforementioned Bruker as a class B which is not used for anything but to give semi-unique addresses to different components of Lab machinery which sit on internal networks worldwide. Classic abuse of public address space for what amounts to textbook RFC 1918.
IBM is holding 9.0.0.0/8 which it practically does not use, There is a huge block in the high
The only place where there is some IPv4 address shortage are the APNIC blocks. RIPE and especially ARIN still have plenty of address space to go around even without going and starting to ask people like IBM if they actually use those class As.
Re:What are the Downsides to IPv6? Anyone? (Score:5, Informative)
Additionally, there are less options in IPv6, making the logic to analyze a packet even more simple than for IPv4.
Random Google result:
http://www.cybertelecom.org/dns/Ipv6.htm [cybertelecom.org]
If you keep spreading FUD instead of doing a simple Google search we will never get IPv6.
Re:What are the Downsides to IPv6? Anyone? (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, the address is four times as long, but since many checks for valid options can be removed and routing tables are going to get smaller, the additional overhead is small or non-existent, maybe even negative. What is a simple check of an address against a table of addresses with a (now fixed!) mask compared to the complex logic to verify the validity of 6 additional options?
Re:Stats on IP usage? (Score:5, Informative)
Also, IPv6 NAT should never ever see the light of day.
Re:The first (Score:5, Informative)
Where did DavyGrvy mention turning off IPv4? They work together, you know. Do even Slashdotters not understand that adding IPv6 to a network does nothing to reduce IPv4 connectivity? It's win-win.
IPv6 tunnels over IPv4. IPv4 tunnels over IPv6. Machines running IPv4 can talk to machines running IPv6. Machines running IPv6 can talk to machines running IPv4.
IPv6 still has issues, to be sure, but interoperability with IPv4 isn't one of them.
Re:What are the Downsides to IPv6? Anyone? (Score:3, Informative)
The real issue is that IPv6 was supposed to provide a heirarchical address scheme to simplify routing, but hasn't actually done so. Global addresses are just a flat number. Site local addresses completely failed to address the issue, and have been deprecated without even a suggested replacement. Link local addresses aren't useful for much beyond auto-configuration. There are clearly enough bits to work with, but no useful RFC yet.
IPv6 multicast will be neat, however, in a decade or two when you can count on it being available.
Re:By biggest question on if this is ready is.. (Score:3, Informative)
And besides, I wouldn't connect Windows directly to the network in any case. It likes to trip over and salivate like a small child. Better use a real system to protect it.
Re:Favorite part (Score:3, Informative)
Oh, goodness me, are you ever off. Earth's area is 5.1e14 square meters [vendian.org]. 2**128 ~= 3.4e38. 3.4e38 / 5.1e14 = 6.7e23 IPv6 addresses per square meter. For square feet, call it 6e22 addresses per square foot. (1 square meter's pretty close to 10 square feet [google.com].)
So, you're off by a about 21 and a half orders of magnitude. That's not even close by astronomical standards.
Re:What are the Downsides to IPv6? Anyone? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:What are the Downsides to IPv6? Anyone? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What are the Downsides to IPv6? Anyone? (Score:3, Informative)
This is not correct; such a scheme would not support manually-assigned addresses, privacy addresses, or cryptographically-generated addresses. IPv6 has neighbor discovery (and its cache) just like IPv4 has ARP.
Re:A simple question (Score:3, Informative)
I could do that for www.sixxs.net, www.kame.net and every host that already has IPv6 connectivity. So "we" are not getting anywhere with IPv6 because it doesn't work because the big sites don't bother because IPv6 isn't anywhere yet. Nice way to get nothing done ever.
If I send my buddies e-mail, most of the time everything is IPv6 only, including DNS lookups, although DNS transport over IPv6 isn't really common yet.
Some people are indeed sitting on IPv6 and wondering when the rest will follow.