ReactOS 0.3 RC1 Released 54
ajdlinux writes "A few days ago ReactOS 0.3 RC1 was released! After a long 6 months without a release this seems good! The ReactOS team has also started a software compatibility list for programs that are ReactOS-compatible. AFAIK the documentation and wiki hasn't yet been updated, but it should be soon. Go get it and try it out!"
Excited submitter? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Excited submitter? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Excited submitter? (Score:2, Funny)
Auditing... (Score:4, Interesting)
A fully audited source will help prevent tainting of code from unscrupulous coders.
Re:Auditing... (Score:1)
Re:Auditing... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Auditing... (Score:1)
That is, if it ever succeeds.
Right now it's pretty much anal pudding for most, I mean, all users and/or servers. However, windows compatibility is the one thing everybody wants to have, and if we can get that thing to work and also have a familiar look & feel, ReactOS is going to absolutely rock.
Re:And to think... (Score:2)
Re:And to think... (Score:2)
Re:And to think... (Score:1)
Re:And to think... (Score:3, Funny)
Which the editors would never use!
ReactOS is a Windows compatible OS (Score:5, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReactOS
Important even if you don't run Windows (Score:5, Interesting)
Right now we have Wine (or Cedega, if you prefer) if you want to run Windows applications on Linux. However, what's always intrigued me about ReactOS is the possibility of using it as the client OS on a virtual machine. I think this has certain advantages over Wine (sandboxing, greater application compatibility), and removes the biggest disincentive to Windows virtualization -- the requirement of purchasing a Windows license.
Also, because it's open source, it seems like it would be easier to get ReactOS working as a client OS on a paravirtualized system like Xen without having to use things like Vanderpool/Pacifica or accept the performance penalties of VMware. That, to me seems very cool: I could be running a Linux system as the server/Domain-zero OS, and then have multiple paravirtualized, Windows-compatible clients running on it, at full speed, without having to purchase any licenses or being dependent on any specialized virtualization hardware.
Re:Important even if you don't run Windows (Score:3, Interesting)
there's a better way: Terminal Server capability (Score:5, Interesting)
then once you have a server running in the [virtual-]machine of your choice, you can then run rdesktop or other thin client to connect to it.
here's the thing: the original developers of NT 3.1 were _not_ going to add a GUI: they planned it as a DOS-like (actually VMS-like) "thing" - and were told "from on high" to get it "windowsey". what make ReactOS so interesting is that such a goal could ultimately be achieved - making it much easier to virtualise because you wouldn't need a full desktop environment in the virtual machine: just a command prompt.
the difficulty with putting ReactOS into a virtual machine like XEN - which is a hybrid VM architecture - is that you need to rewrite your HAL (hardware abstraction layer) to fit on top of XEN, not to fit on top of "real" hardware.
here's the real kicker about that: once you _have_ written a XEN-HAL for ReactOS - with complete source code available to you - there exists a strong possibility of being able to "drop in" those
Terminal Server...that would be cool. (Score:2)
I wonder what it would take to build something that wasn't a desktop OS, but was just capable of serving up applications remotely, over Citrix, or something Citrix-like?
There could be a big market for something that let you serve up Windows applications (even older Win98 ones), without paying the really steep Windows Terminal Server per-seat licensing fees. I've worked on some Citrix stuff and the amount they pay in licensing is just ou
Re:Important even if you don't run Windows (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php/Xen_port [reactos.org]
Mmm. Fun times, kids.
Re:Important even if you don't run Windows (Score:1)
Re:ReactOS is a Windows compatible OS (Score:1)
Screenshot [photobucket.com]
Well, because it's a windows like OS... (Score:4, Insightful)
I guess the good news is that I can get a FREE OS that will get manipulated just by hooking up to the net.
My two cents..
Re:Well, because it's a windows like OS... (Score:1)
Yes, but... (Score:2, Interesting)
The reason that Windows is so crappy with security is the evil demon of backwards compatibility. Microsoft has to make "C:\Program Files" writeable because of all of the Windows software that expects it to be writeable. Microsoft's efforts to somehow have their cake and eat it too (by locking down those directories with hacks to support older software) with Vista is a major stumbling block
Re:Yes, but... (Score:2)
-How about an extra set of control panels or
-Intercept certain system calls and ensure that, say, applications can only write to certain folders and only read or write certain pieces of the registry.
-Running the web browser as a seperate application instead of an inherent piece of the operating system would help.
Re:Well, because it's a windows like OS... (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes if you click yes to every random popup and run unknown exe w/o a thought. No OS can help you this way.
No if you are talking about automated worms. Being windows compartible doesn't mean that it need to imitate its security holes as well.
Security-Enhanced Windows (Score:3, Interesting)
note: i didn't say that this would be a _small_ project - i just said that it would be _possible_.
and here's the kicker: the DLLs and
there therefore exists a strong possibility of being able to run Windows N
You can already do this (Score:2, Informative)
Once that option is off, pretty much none of these baddies run. Cool eh? The reason that more people don't do this is because certain crappy software will refuse to run. This isn't the fault of Windows; this is the fault of this crappy software. Additionally, people would have to run installers as administrators - not a big problem for you and I but it would be a problem for Grandma.
Re:You can already do this (Score:2)
I'm sorry, but this pops up every time there's a Windows security discussion, and its wrong every time. There are new privilege escalation exploits being found every month in Windows, and the only reason black-hats aren't commonly using them is because there's no need. Running as non-admin is sensible, but its not a panacea.
OMG this is SO Windows (Score:5, Funny)
Re:OMG this is SO Windows (Score:1)
You're running it on Virtual PC, so this is not really relevant. Lots of Operating Systems which run perfectly well on real hardware crash when run under virtualisation.
Your total failure to note that rather important fact in your comment makes it a little disingenuous and, dare I say, karma whoring.
Re:OMG this is SO Windows (Score:3, Interesting)
BS. Anyway my "total failure" to report that does not ma-- wait a sec, how did you find out? Oh, because I put a frigging SCREENSHOT up on ImageShack? OMG I am teh stealthy, apparently. Karma whore? How about... HAVING FUN? I made a *joke*. You know what... I didn't even mention that on the second run it did work quite well. So I guess that makes me some fundie child-molesting nazist, or something?
Re:OMG this is SO Windows (Score:2)
"Funny" does not affect your karma. You've been here a while, you should know that by now.
Re:From the ReactOS website: (Score:3)
GP said "for everyone", not "for linux fans". This is a Windows compatible OS.
Re:From the ReactOS website: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:From the ReactOS website: (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:From the ReactOS website: (Score:1)
The fact is that Windows is fine for most people, while linux is not. What you find is pretty much irrelevent.
Re:From the ReactOS website: (Score:2)
Where are the thieves? (Score:1)
Ekush [72.14.207.104]
Re:Ummm (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Ummm (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, a number less than 1, which generally indicates a finished version of a piece of software.
In case you didn't figure it out by now, ReactOS is still under development.
Re:Ummm (Score:5, Insightful)
Shouldn't this be modded as Funny?
I think 1.0 generally indicates that the bug severity vs. manager severity ratio has tipped in favor of the manager, and the product ships regardless.
Even in products that actually, you know, work at 1.0, rarely are they finished.
Wine ? (Score:1)
Re:Wine ? (Score:2)
You would get the ability to use all of your Windows-compatible software PLUS no cost for the operating system PLUS the ability to view the source code of the operating