Apple Offers Solution to IT Roadmap Complaints 52
daria42 writes "Apple has admitted that enterprise IT users complain a lot about not being able to find out what its product roadmap is ahead of time. The Apple answer to this problem? Sign a non-disclosure agreement and go to Apple's annual worldwide developer conference, to be held in August this year in San Francisco. IT users can apparently get plans of Apple's roadmap up to 18 months ahead."
Vagueness (Score:4, Insightful)
It'll leak anyway.
Re:Vagueness (Score:5, Insightful)
And Price.
You can bet there will be no juicy information such as "We plan to have a expandible minitower on the market for $800 in 2007. So don't buy a PowerMac unless you *really* need it!!". Instead you'll get the standard Intel roadmap which anyone can read on the Inqurier.
I think this is really to molify institutional concerns about the Intel switchover -- It happened so fast, I imagine that quite a few shops that couldn't manage budgets/planning quickly enough. One day they were selling iMac G5s and the next day they weren't, and too bad if you were using Photoshop or something.
Re:Vagueness (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Vagueness (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:On the other hand (Score:4, Insightful)
Here's what is certain, though:
1) xnu was, at one point, open for both Intel and PPC.
2) Downloading it was listed as a step in some guides for getting Mac OS X to work on non-Apple Intel hardware.
3) Intel xnu is no longer open, PPC xnu is.
You don't have to be Kreskin to figure this one out.
Enterprise hypocracy? (Score:1, Insightful)
Companies buy cheap, problem-prone Windows PCs to capture short-term savings, instead of paying a little more initially for Macs and reaping years of savings via lower support costs. And then these same companies turn around and criticize Apple for not "allowing" them to plan long-term? That makes me laugh.
These guys like to say that they think long-term, but they're full of it. They focus on quarter-to-quarter, and that's it-- maybe 6 months ahead, tops. And what kind of roadmap do you really need for IT? "Here's a new machine. In 2-3 years, when you're ready to replace it, we'll offer faster (and probably cheaper) ones."
And what about when you have a vendor who can't stick to their roadmap, like, oh, I don't know-- Microsoft? How many "long term" plans has Vista's constant slippage completely hosed? How much corporate money was pissed away on Software Assurance agreements that expired before Microsoft could even produce the assured software?
The whole "Apple is too secretive" argument is just a bunch of horse crap. Corporate IT doesn't like Macs because you don't need a giant support staff and a huge budget when you have computers that (relative to Windows PCs) don't break.
Re:Jeez... (Score:4, Insightful)
I mean, if their understanding of the Mac platform is "it uses all proprietary hardware, you have to buy special ethernet cables for it, and you can't just hook it into a Windows network", then why can't i go back and talk about their OS in a similar timeframe of obsolesence?