JetBlue to Offer WiFi 121
andyring writes "Although some trans-Atlantic flights offer WiFi for a fee, JetBlue has won approval from the FCC to provide WiFi on their flights." From the article: "While Verizon's telephone service aboard commercial planes has not done well because of the high cost to use the phones, there has been interest in offering high-speed Internet access in the air to business travelers. The licenses will not mean travelers can soon use their cell phones in the air. The FCC and Federal Aviation Administration are still weighing whether to permit that."
Price? (Score:1)
Re:Price? (Score:4, Funny)
Hope you're not posting this from a Jetblue flight.
Note to Self (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Note to Self (Score:2)
Great. Just great. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Great. Just great. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Great. Just great. (Score:2)
Re:Great. Just great. (Score:1)
So instead of cell phone... (Score:5, Insightful)
Great!
One of the last bastions of not having to listen to idiots shout their personal business gone.
Sigh.
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm guessing that in a few years, cellphone and VOIP talk on airplanes will be widespread. At that point, you're going to be stuck bringing headphones and listening to music for your entire flight. What a bummer that will be.
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:3, Insightful)
And that's different from the current situation... how? The plane itself already makes an annoying amount of noise. Mostly-white noise. you know, the kind that makes it hard to hear conversations more than a few feet away. And at a level that noise-cancelling headphones are already a must for anyone who cares about their ears or sleeping or that portable movie you broug
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2)
White noise isn't a nuisance. In fact it's quiet relaxing, it drowns out the small noises so it actually seems quieter. I often leave the computer on in my bedroom when I go to sleep and there's noise nearby, as the fan drowns it out.
Conversations are far more irritating as they're unpredictable and high-pitched. Phones are even worse because you're only hearing on
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2)
I'm think that's the key. We're used to hearing strangers' normal conversations and we're pretty good at subconsciously tuning them out. With cell phones, the guy talks for a few seconds, then silence, then starts talking again. My entirely unsupported theory is that each time he starts talking, our brains register it as a "new" conversation and have to expend effort to once again
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2)
Noise-cancelling headphones work great for airplane background noise.
They are near-worthless for dealing with the noise created by those who feel their stupid loud conversation is more important than the 30 people nearby they are disturbing..
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2)
and crying babies. I know I'm going to come off as rude here, but infants do not belong on airplanes. For one thing, their only way of telling you "this hurts" also happens to be their only
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2)
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:3, Insightful)
Or you could buy some earplugs.
But why... (Score:2)
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:3, Informative)
I certainly hope they keep cell phones off of flights...(and even though they work on most flights, they are a HUGE strain on the tower network on the ground which is not designed to deal with calls from airplanes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2)
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:1)
And I'm in the USA, so I know that the latter must be true.
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2)
Perhaps you need to learn the language most commonly spoken on the Iberian peninsula before making these proclamations. I took the AVE from Sevilla to Madrid two weeks ago and it was clearly announced in Spanish that talking
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2, Informative)
At least Amtrak gets this right.
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:2)
And I've actually seen the conductor remove someone from the quiet car for continuing to use his phone after a warning. People were cheering.
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:1, Troll)
I swear some people are just so self-important...
Tom
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:3, Informative)
Flying in first isn't hoing to solve anything and NR headphones are much better at regular, low frequency sounds than they are at voice. Also, they get a little tedious to wear for 10+ hours or while trying to sleep.
Check out a frequent flyer web site like flyertalk.com and see what regular travelers think of phones on planes. The sentiment is very much against them, probably over 90%. Yeah, if you travel 1-2x a year, it no skin off your nose. It's a
Phones on a plane! (Score:2)
While I, a flyertalk poster, agree that it will really suck when the vast unwashed masses spend a JFK->ICN hop chatting to their book club (yes, that's 16 hours), it seems unlikely to happen any time soon.
First, we've already had the possibility of this. Airfone covers the lower 48 pretty well, and some vessels have satellite service as well. I've both called and received from them for several years. Admittedly these calls were cut off a
Re:Phones on a plane! (Score:2)
But up in business class, the selling point is "we'll deliver your employees to their destination and they'll be rested." If Phones On A Plane interfere with this, we're either going to see lower international C fares, or FA nazis telling people to hang up and fly.
This is an excellent reason for the carriers to deliberately fail to regulate loud annoying people in the coach cabin. If you don't buy tickets that book into C, your employees are going to be hosed
Re:So instead of cell phone... (Score:1)
Plug a headset with a microphone in your laptop and pretend you're using VoIP, so the adjoining salesman won't interrupt your three-hour-long phone call.
NSA (Score:1)
Not necessarily being used for free wifi (Score:4, Informative)
"A spokesman from JetBlue said he was unable to comment on what the company plans to do with its 1MHz license. Some speculate it will offer more in-flight video entertainment and Internet services. JetBlue already offers DirecTV service on its flights."
The way the post is written makes it sound like JetBlue is giving free WiFi on their flights. Not only is it not stated it will be free, but it's not stated it will be WiFi, just that they won some wireless spect.
Re:Not necessarily being used for free wifi (Score:2)
Re:Not necessarily being used for free wifi (Score:2)
In fact the writeup says they'll be offering it to business travelers. I read "business" is a codeword for "people who are willing to pay extra," analogous to "business class seats" or "business class laptop."
Re:Not necessarily being used for free wifi (Score:1)
Re:Not necessarily being used for free wifi (Score:1)
Re:Not necessarily being used for free wifi (Score:2)
Re:Not necessarily being used for free wifi (Score:2)
Re:Not necessarily being used for free wifi (Score:1)
Been there done that (Score:5, Informative)
I can't sleep on planes, so it was great to check my e-mail and get holiday photos ready on the plane on the way back too instead of losing time.
Also there was an important notice that no ad-hoc connections were allowed for safety reasons, although how valid those were (I suspect: not very) I don't know.
Re:Been there done that (Score:3, Insightful)
Ha ha, pull the other one. Since neither you nor I can think of any reason to believe the safety excuse, can anybody else?
More likely they just don't want anybody reselling the service. Pop a second Wi-Fi card into your laptop, get a merchant account to verify CC numbers and you're ready to make a killing undercutting their price by 50%. At least you'd recoup your own WiFi cost, with only 2 sales. Come to think of it [epitest.fi], it wouldn't require ad-hoc a
Bluetooth (Score:4, Funny)
http://www.triv.org.uk/~danny/images/bluetooth_ai
Jet Blue Rules (Score:2)
Blue Chips, DirecTV, and now Wi-Fi? What next? (Score:4, Funny)
How about a mini-tasor gun in my armrest for the toddler behind me who keeps kicking my seat? And a fullsize tasor for his mother for being a stupid bitch?
How about a ceiling mounted electric cattle prod for the dude with the overstuffed backpacks that he shoved into the overhead, crushing my leather jacket?
If JetBlue could give me those things, and keep the blue potato chips coming until I say stop, I'll never fly another domestic carrier.
Bug in the blurb (Score:3, Insightful)
Yet Another Reason to fly JB! (Score:5, Interesting)
Knowing JetBlue it won't be very expensive either. They are truly the model of how an airline should be, focused on the passenger, their cost, and experience, not simply a government-bailed-out bloated corporation that sells seats next to each other for hundreds and thousands different than the seat next to them.
So bravo to Jet Blue - they already are my favorite airline, and they just keep getting better!
AE
Re:Yet Another Reason to fly JB! (Score:2)
Re:Yet Another Reason to fly JB! (Score:2)
Really? I must have missed something when I was told that JetBlue flies nonstop from Long Beach to several cities in the US. Or that Jetblue flies out of the Oakland nonstop to several major cities other than NYC, like Boston and DC. Or that Jetblue flies nonstop from Burbank to Las Vegas, and Burbank to Orlando.
I didn't realize all these flights somehow stop in NYC.
http://www.jetblue.com/travelinfo/routemap.asp [jetblue.com]
More accurately, Jetblue is a point-to-point airline.
Re:Yet Another Reason to fly JB! (Score:2)
I know they don't go everywhere, but they go to most major domestic travel locations these days. If you haven't checked their site in a few months, go do so - I'm always shocked at the expansion.
If it's an option, it's great; if it's not, then pray that it soon is. I'm amazed that I'm a "fan" of an airl
I would love to see them in Chicago... (Score:2)
There is always Southwest, I suppose, but I like them for different reasons.
Re:Yet Another Reason to fly JB! (Score:2)
I've flown JetBlue probably 50 times on a half-dozen different routes, never once to or from New York.
Time to check your hazmat suit for leaks?
Re:Yet Another Reason to fly JB! (Score:1)
JetBlue is absolutely the best (Score:1)
Business travel is misery, pure and simple. Last night American kept me on the plane f
Re:Yet Another Reason to fly JB! (Score:1)
"Roughly one-third of the Salvadoran mechanics have passed the exam that qualifies them for the Federal Aviation Administration's license, while in the United States, such licenses are required for all mechanics employed directly by the airlines."
Kind of scary, eh?
They are truly the model of how an airline should be, focused on the
Re:Yet Another Reason to fly JB! (Score:2)
I'm not sure how much credibility I'd put in certifications and tests. Look at how much many of us laugh at the MSCE (the Microsoft credentials
They Blue It (Score:2, Informative)
Expect every packet on their WiFi to be sniffed, analyzed and sent to the highest bidder. Including, but not limited to, DHS.
Re:They Blue It (Score:1, Troll)
Look, the internet is an open book...anything you look at, or put on it, anywhere, is open game. It's just common sense.
If you expect any public connection like that to not be exposed you are sorely mistaken. If Bush and his cronies want to know that I read Yahoo! news, checked
Smart p
Re:They Blue It (Score:2)
JetBlow said they would not release PNR info to the feds. Later, it turned out that they were doing precisely that while lying about it.
You are free, of course, to choose to do business with known liars who hand over your personal information to government spies operating without judicial oversight, and with neither your knowledge or consent. That's one benefit of living, for the time being, in a free country.
Re:They Blue It (Score:2)
The fact is, the government can find out anything about you they wish much easier than asking JetBlue. JetBlue has no information about me that the government couldn't find much more easily in other ways.
I understand the issue, that the government is out of control spying on us, and I hope that those responsible loose power (and I am more politically active than most citizens so that isn't a passive wish). However, I
Re:They Blue It (Score:2)
Re:They Blue It (Score:2)
The point is: It's none of their fucking business what you or I am reading/downloading/uploading/etc. on the Internet, or talking about on the telephone, and furthermore, those fucks are violating the very laws they're supposed to be enforcing in the first place. It's about rights and laws, and not the fact that today I wasted most of the day reading posts on slashdot.
No cellphones aloud, but there are alternatives. (Score:1)
Re:No cellphones aloud, but there are alternatives (Score:1)
Re:No cellphones aloud, but there are alternatives (Score:1)
They first had a program that ran in the background that quit any unauthorized apps. The 1st solution was to turn off the program squashing app.
Then they made Task Manager unavailable. The solution was to change the application name.
Then they kept you from access Program Files and DLing software. The solution was to use AIM Express from aim.com.
Then they blocked aim.com. The solution was to use aim.co.uk.
My point is that there
Re:No cellphones aloud, but there are alternatives (Score:1)
Passenger RF-devices make Planes Crash and Burn (Score:2, Interesting)
Are you sure? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Passenger RF-devices make Planes Crash and Burn (Score:1)
The other major concerns have to do with personal safety--not being distracted in an emergency when instructions are being given, having the cabin clear during take-off and landing phases, etc. Then there are the separate problems of interference with ground communications and general cou
Doppler shift (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Doppler shift (Score:2)
You do realize the plane has radios of its own right?
In the time the signal travels the max 100m from one end to another the plane probably moved 1mm in space at most. They're also fixed points relative to each other.
By your logic microwave towers shouldn't work, and the earth rotates FAR FASTER than planes travel (which is why you still lose time when you travel west).
Tom
Re:Doppler shift (Score:2)
Re:Doppler shift (Score:2)
tags. Here are the missing tags.
Re:Doppler shift (Score:2)
Now, the big question is, what happens in supersonic flight?!
(Yes, that's a joke folks.)
Re:Doppler shift (Score:2)
And it doesn't matter, doppler only occurs for radio [or light] when two bodies are moving relative to one another. If you're on the plane and you're AP is on the plane then you're both stationary.
You'd get more acceleration from moving the laptop in your lap then by the amount the airframe bends as it travels through the air...
I know you seem to be kiddin but this thread is seriously bunkable.
Tom
Re:Doppler shift (Score:2)
If i'm right, the speed at which the plane is moving does not affect the speed at which the light is emitted from it....... so in effect the emitter may as well be stationary and the re
Re:Doppler shift (Score:2)
rj
Seat Pitch? (Score:1)
Re:Seat Pitch? (Score:2)
And what's with the arm rests that sit 2" off the seat? My elbow doesn't go that far (I'm ~6'1") down and if the plane ever did roll I'd just topple over it anyways, it isn't high enough to catch my body in any meaningful manner. I swear plane designers have to either be super greedy or REALLY SHORT.
I also laugh when I see some 6'6" sucker get on the plane ahead of me. At least they're going th
Re:Seat Pitch? (Score:2)
I would love to have my Zaurus connected wirelessly, maybe with an external keyboard, but probably not necessary. Most of what I would probably do online is check/respond to email, some light surfing.
great for Software as a Service (Score:1)
Microwaving humans (Score:1)
One more workday . . . (Score:2, Funny)
Being expected to telecommute from the plane.
The summary is totally wrong (Score:4, Informative)
First, it's not about Wi-Fi, it's about air-to-ground broadband. More on that in a second.
Second, JetBlue won the smaller of two licenses sold at auction.
Third, it'll be up to two years before service commences.
The auction determined which of three exclusive spectrum configurations would win out. The winning versions was 3 MHz to AC BidCo LLC, a sister company with AirCell, and 1 MHz to JetBlue. The 3 MHz license was widely seen as the desirable one because using standard EVDO Rev. A, there should be over 1.5 Mbps available in each direction. (The FCC designed the new licenses to handle EVDO and a few other standards, and the allotted spectrum is split symmetrically in air-to-ground and ground-to-air segments.)
JetBlue, the owners of license winners LiveTV, will likely use its approximately 500 Kbps downstream to carry streaming video or to spool video for inflight use through cached content. Upstream could be used for cabin surveillance and aircraft use. JetBlue might roll out this technology to other airlines.
AirCell already runs a general aviation (non-commercial) air-station network for in-flight broadband, and will be able now to cut deals with all the major airlines that want this. Their ultimate system should be lightweight (thus not a big fuel drag) and desirable.
Wi-Fi has to be tested separately, by the way. They won't be able to just turn this on. The FCC and FAA will require them to test their equipment with specific airlines and planes in order to roll it out.
With dual-mode cell phones (cell + Wi-Fi) plus Skype and other VoIP services on laptops plus Wi-Fi-only handsets, it will be likely that calling in flight will be very common.
The other part of this deal is that Verizon AirFone, which controls parts of the 4 MHz that was auctioned off, now has up to two years to move from 4 MHz to a vertically polarized 1 MHz (overlapping with LiveTV's license). License winners are allowed to give Verizon financial incentives to move faster. AirFone is on 4,500 planes, including government ones, and is highly underused. With this move to new equipment, AirFone might dramatically drop its pricing...or airlines might ask for the equipment to be entirely removed.
who needs cellular when u have WiFi? (Score:2)
Re:who needs cellular when u have WiFi? (Score:2)
Keep phones expensive (Score:2)
So, do you think the airline will choose to filter the internet to make it harder for people to look up porn on flights? Then again, airports always have tons of porn mags. I've never seen anyone buy one though.
One small step for stewardesses (Score:3, Funny)
And up skirt stewardess pics!
Would you rather typing or talking? (Score:2, Informative)
For all the disparaging remarks:
a) Yes, there really are emails/phone calls that are worth $5+/minute. This sounds stupid but when you can answer a question in $10 worth of time that saves a $
So far so good (Score:2)
But it will happen eventually. There's no real technical reason to ban the use of cell phones in the air. There never
Evil laugh... (Score:1)
Okay, but... (Score:2)
sigh...
Re:VOIP? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:VOIP? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:VOIP? (Score:2)
Re:VOIP? (Score:1)
Lufthansa offers in flight Wifi already, and the bandwidth is typically 120 - 160kbps (although they claim that they offer higher bandwidth). If they use satellite to relay the signal to a ground staion, then you're looking at 500-600ms delays. Given the this, the VOIP quality would be pretty crappy.
Re:VOIP? (Score:1)
Re:VOIP? (Score:1)
Skype defi
Re:Nice try... (Score:1)