Review of Seagate's 750Gb Hard Drive 414
Zoxed writes "The Tech Report have a comprehensive review of Seagate's Barracuda-7200.10 'perpendicular' drive, including a primer on the technology. They ran performance tests against 10 other drives, checking the noise and power consumption levels. The Seagate fared pretty well, even on cost (per Gigabyte)." From the article: "Perpendicular recording does wonders for storage capacity, and thanks to denser platters, it can also improve drive performance. Couple those benefits with support for 300 MB/s Serial ATA transfer rates, Native Command Queuing, and up to 16 MB of cache, and the Barracuda 7200.10 starts to look pretty appealing. Throw in an industry-leading five year warranty and a cost per gigabyte that's competitive with 500 GB drives, and you may quickly find yourself scrambling to justify a need for 750 GB of storage capacity."
The justification for more space (Score:5, Funny)
Big HUGE warnings (Score:2, Funny)
2. 7 100 Gb disks (that would cost less than USD 430 [techreport.com]) will be at least 7 times more reliable than the 7200.10 with possibile similar performances.
Re:Now all I need...is a backup perhaps? (Score:5, Funny)
Seriously, there is no reason whatsoever for anyone to lose any data. Even if it means forking over the money for a tape backup and tapes, if you lose any data due to a drive failure you have no one to blame but yourself. If it's important, build a RAID. If its critical, build a RAID with some kind of tape or other backup.
Yeah, I know, this is "Well, no shit, Sherlock" territory, but it always irks me when someone talks about losing data because there's no real need for losing any data, particularly if it's important.
Of course, if getting that data back is a simple task of downloading (again) from alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica, that's a different situation.
only 187 million times cheaper per bit (Score:5, Funny)
Price I don't know, definitely no less than $5000 of 1972 dollars. That's about 78 bits per dollar.
This new disk is about 14634146341.463414634146341463415 bits per dollar that's an improvement of about 187 million times .
but wait those old dolalrs were at least 4 times more studly than today's, so that's about 600 million times better over the last 34 years. An annual rate of about 183% !
Re:The justification for more space (Score:5, Funny)
its funny... (Score:3, Funny)
customer: "my drive failed...i would like it replaced"
company: "sure..here is your new one!"
customer: "uhhh...what happened to my data?"
Re:The justification for more space (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Myth boxes and the like (Score:5, Funny)
Re:its funny... (Score:2, Funny)
BOFH: "You will have to re-enter it all manually. And remember that hard drives store data in binary, so you will have to use only the 0 and 1 keys."
Re:The justification for more space (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The justification for more space (Score:5, Funny)
No no....no no. Well. No. Absolutely not. Porn Music no. Porn AND Music, yes.
Magneto (Score:2, Funny)
You suppose this drive uses technology similar to that Magneto uses to achieve all of his Mutant feats?
750 GB (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Big HUGE warnings (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The justification for more space (Score:5, Funny)
Do you mean music from porn movies, or audio porn? The latter is good to work out to; somehow, I find I don't get tired nearly as fast when I'm turned on.
Re:The justification for more space (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The justification for more space (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Get perpendicular :D (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The justification for more space (Score:3, Funny)
Re:That's a lot of DVDs (Score:3, Funny)
You're right. Its so important to have offsite backups for reliability.
Think about it. If you're diligent about it, and take offsite backups from your house to your work or neighbors or whatnot, when you're house burns down you can still have all of your MP3s, TV shows, and everything!
The bitch is that you forgot to do redundancy and offsite backups of your couch, TV, computer, stereo, wife, kids, and pets.