USPTO Rules Fogent JPEG Patent Invalid 240
fistfullast33l writes "Groklaw has reported that the USPTO has ruled the broadest claims of the JPEG Patent held by Fogent to be invalid. PUBPAT, the organization that requested the review, released the news earlier today. According to PJ, the ruling will be hard to overturn as the 'submitters knew about the prior art but failed to tell the USPTO about it.'"
USPTO (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Good (Score:4, Funny)
Re:USPTO (Score:5, Funny)
Re:USPTO - Even More (Score:5, Funny)
Especially if you promote it as a new Energy Source.
Heck, you can probably get VC funding for it as well.
Strategic Error (Score:4, Funny)
News headlines! (Score:5, Funny)
Crap... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:USPTO (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Good (Score:5, Funny)
Thanks folks. I'm here all week. Try the veal.
Re:USPTO - Even More (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Hard to overturn but...Not Enough! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:USPTO (Score:5, Funny)
Re:USPTO - Even More (Score:5, Funny)
Having worked with a few, I can understand the confusion.
Re:USPTO - Even More (Score:3, Funny)
I think that's a completely inappropriate and insensitive comparison. One group acted in a completely vicious and amoral fashion: causing great suffering, imprisoning people for years, and acting with a callous disregard for human life. Whereas the other group was just a bunch of communists rebels.