Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Bio-Engineered Rice Uses Human Genes 417

gliph writes "Yahoo news has a piece about a small biogenetics firm that is using genetically engineered rice containing human genes to help fight diarrhea. From the article: 'Ventria's rice produces two human proteins found in mother's milk, saliva and tears, which help people hydrate and lessen the severity and duration of diarrhea attacks, a top killer of children in developing countries.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bio-Engineered Rice Uses Human Genes

Comments Filter:
  • by Enderandrew ( 866215 ) <enderandrew&gmail,com> on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @03:41AM (#15348951) Homepage Journal
    Did you read the article? This genetically modified rice is destined for the developing world. Many of them have meager means. Allowing them to just grow rice that can save lives (children die of dehydration there) is pretty worthwhile.
  • I know that plenty of the people here locally in the University of Nebraska work on developing crops that grow in developing nations and help these people to cultivate the land and become more self-sustaining. I imagine that the intent here isn't to try and sell rice to Africa, but rather find a type of rice to grow in Africa. And dehydration may not seem like much to you, but in Africa believe it or not infant mortality from dehydration is very serious. They use cheap formula watered down with bad water to begin with, and then they get sick on top of that, which causes worse dehydration. If this saves lives of babies, then I'm for it.
  • by Whiney Mac Fanboy ( 963289 ) * <whineymacfanboy@gmail.com> on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @03:56AM (#15349002) Homepage Journal
    When clean water is not always at hand, diseases such as dysentery are easy to catch. Although this rice is no cure, it can help prevent the loss of fluids associated with this disease and help save lives.

    It's not like they're going to ship the rice for the local farmers to grow - from tfa:
    The company says the chance of its genetically engineered rice ending up in the food supply is remote because the company grinds the rice and extracts the protein before shipping.
    And its not like they're going to give it away for free [ventriabio.com]:
    Ventria owns product and enabling technology rights from its internal development effort and by license, assignment, or exclusive option agreements as follows:

            * 5 issued United States patents relating to protein expression and products
            * 4 foreign patents relating to protein expression and products
            * Over 10 filings relating to ExpressTec
            * Over 10 filings for the products, their formulations,
    So, we've got a new method of manufacturing proteins by extracting them from GM rice. US rice farmers are worried that it will affect trade with anti-GM nations. Environmentalists are worried about it for the usual GM worries (cross pollination with wild rices, unknown future side affects, species jumping, etc).

    I think the way to cure dysentry is like many other posters have said, to fix infrastructure.
  • by RajivSLK ( 398494 ) on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @04:48AM (#15349155)
    In 2002, diarrhea seems to be the6th leading cause of death world wide [infoplease.com]. The third leading cause in children under 5 (second if you discount children whom do not survive birth).
  • by slashmojo ( 818930 ) on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @05:08AM (#15349209)
    Or not..

    "The company says the chance of its genetically engineered rice ending up in the food supply is remote.."

  • Vaccination (Score:2, Informative)

    by crc32 ( 133399 ) <{moc.23crc} {ta} {niloc}> on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @07:03AM (#15349505) Homepage
    This is another solution - vaccinate against the organisms that most often cause dysentary.

    Not really. Vaccination is much more difficult than you imply, especially because the organisms that cause most of these diseases are bacteria and eukaryotes. Much harder to vaccinate against than viruses, and much less effective when you do design one that "works".
  • No maybe about it (Score:3, Informative)

    by GuloGulo2 ( 972355 ) on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @08:26AM (#15349809)
    You're wrong.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insulin#Timeline [wikipedia.org]

    "Human insulin is now manufactured for widespread clinical use using genetic engineering techniques, which significantly reduces impurity reaction problems. Eli Lilly marketed the first such insulin, Humulin, in 1982. Humulin was the first medication produced using modern genetic engineering techniques, in which actual human DNA is inserted into a host cell (E. coli in this case). The host cells are then allowed to grow and reproduce normally, and due to the inserted human DNA, they produce actual human insulin.

    Genentech developed the technique Lilly used to produce Humulin. Novo Nordisk has also developed a genetically engineered insulin independently. Most insulins used clinically are produced this way, for they avoid most of the allergic reaction problem."
  • Re:Product's name: (Score:5, Informative)

    by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve ( 949321 ) on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @09:17AM (#15350092)
    OK, I'll bite. Unlike what appears to be the majority of Slashdotters, I actually am a Christian and yes I do go to a church that you would call "fundamentalist". While we don't use that description ourselves, it is accurate. So I think I am qualified to give a non-troll answer.

    Yes, you are being ridiculous. Nobody would consider such rice to be "human". I feel sorry for you because you are either stupid enough to actually think we might think a few human genes makes something human or you are just a sadly misinformed person with regards to how religious people think.

    Personally, while I am not in particular in favor of genetically modified food for reasons that have nothing at all to do with religion, I would not be surprised if some Christians objected to this rice. Not because it is "human" but because the creators are "playing God" or some such nonsense. Personally, I think that God gave us brains to use to make our lives better through advances in science and medicine. If I was going to get on board with genetically modified food, this would probably the be the one I'd support.
  • Re:Product's name: (Score:4, Informative)

    by free space ( 13714 ) on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @09:34AM (#15350207)
    Well,
    I'm a Muslim, but not a religious scholar, so I'm saying my personal opinion, not the 'official' stance of Islam.

    Your example of pig genes in tomatoes can go in many ways. Some Muslims will argue that if it's "pig anything" it's not halal and we won't eat it.

    Other Muslims may say "guys, it's just tomatoes..as long as it's not real pig body parts then no problem".

    Then some others will say "depends on the genes themselves. If they are the genes pigs have in common with other creatures that we already eat freely like cows, then it isn't a problem, but if its genes found only in pigs and other non-halal animals then we'll avoid it".

    Notice, however, that Islam is a very practical religion. And in every time the Quran mentions that pigs are forbidden , it mentions that if someone was forced to eat them or he'll die, then he could eat them as long as his intent is saving life , not disobeying God.

    So I think if a Muslim had to eat some genetically modified product ( that he believes isn't halal) in order to save himself/herself from diarrehea or from hunger, there is no problem with that as long as there is absolutely no other way. If conventional medicine and/or other sources of food exist or can be acquired , he/she has to use those.

    Hope that answered your question.
  • by Mr. Slippery ( 47854 ) <.tms. .at. .infamous.net.> on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @12:07PM (#15351570) Homepage
    This genetically modified rice is destined for the developing world

    From TFA, it's unclear whether they plan to grow their GM rice here and extract the relevant proteins as a suppliment, or use it directly as a food crop which would be grown locally (they've sought FDA appproval as a lightly-regulated "medical food" rather than a drug).

    Allowing them to just grow rice that can save lives (children die of dehydration there) is pretty worthwhile.

    Yeah, right...instead of providing them with conventionally produced mediciation (which would be long off-patent), or infrastrcture for clean water to prevent diarrhea-causing diseases (ditto), let's create a something new, of unproven safety (both to immediately to human beings and long-term to the ecosystem on which we depend) and that brings the developing world under corporate control.

    This is just as stupid as "golden rice", the idea of which was to replace local crops rich in vitamin A with patented rice.

    (BTW, if GM crops are so substantially identical to the originals tha no labeling is needed when they sneak them into my food, how is it that they are at the same time unique enough to be deserving of patents?)

  • by Ritchie70 ( 860516 ) on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @12:46PM (#15351892) Journal
    This isn't a food rice.

    The company is manufacturing a drug (which they want classified as a "medical food" for FDA purposes) by tweaking the genes of a rice plant. The rice is ground up to make the "medical food."

    The big controversy here (per the article) is growing this stuff out in the open where it could potentially cross-polinate or otherwise impact rice crops intended for food.

    The rice itself isn't to be used as food. It's just a big open-air drug factory.

  • parochial attitude (Score:3, Informative)

    by penguin-collective ( 932038 ) on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @01:55PM (#15352457)
    Look at it this way: You're a two year old. I'm the wise old grandmother who babysits you.

    That's typical parochial Western bullshit. People in developing nations aren't two year olds and you aren't their wise old grandmother.

    Are you saying that nobody should give bio-genetics firms any money, because it's just a waste?

    I'm saying that people should concentrate on those things that we know increase life expectancy the most, like building sewers. On the other hand, selling proprietary US crops to these nations makes the primary problem worse: poverty.

    Furthermore, we know that nations can develop without "bio-genetics", 20th century medicine, or high tech because almost all nations that are prosperous today have done so.
  • Living in America? (Score:3, Informative)

    by tempest69 ( 572798 ) on Wednesday May 17, 2006 @03:28PM (#15353252) Journal
    Personally speaking, I would be very unwilling to eat this rice, or any GMO produce in general, and most especially when animal genes have been spliced in. The whole thing skeeves me out like you wouldn't believe!!
    Trying to avoid all GMO's in the US is a bear.. 80ish percent of all soy is GM, making most vegetable oils a GM food, making most processed foods GM.... Try going a normal week in the US eating only non-GMO foods its really tricky, I couldnt manage to skip out on social events, and poof game over.

    Storm

UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker

Working...